scholarly journals Air Pollution Exposure and the Development of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the Active Duty Population

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Elam ◽  
Sorana Raiculescu ◽  
Shyam Biswal ◽  
Zhenyu Zhang ◽  
Michael Orestes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction It has been shown that combat environment exposure, including burn pits that produce particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), is associated with lower respiratory tract disease in the military population with increased hypothetical risk of upper respiratory disease, but no study has been done that examines the effects of non-combat environmental exposures on the development of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in the active duty population. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate how air pollution exposure correlates to the development of CRS in active duty service members in the United States. Methods The military electronic medical record was queried for active duty service members diagnosed with CRS by an otolaryngologist between January 2016 and January 2018, who have never deployed, stationed in the United States from 2015 to 2018 (n = 399). For each subject, the 1-year mean exposure of PM2.5, particulate matter 10 (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone was calculated. The control group was comprised of the same criteria except these patients were diagnosed with cerumen impaction and matched to the case group by age and gender (n = 399). Pollution exposure was calculated based on the Environmental Protection Agency’s data tables for each subject. Values were calculated using chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Results Matched cases and controls (n = 399) with 33.1% male showed a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) of 5.99 (95% CI, 2.55-14.03) for exposure of every 5 µg/m3 of PM2.5 increase and the development of CRS when controlling for age, gender, and diagnosis year. When further adjusting for smoking status, the OR was still statistically significant at 3.15 (95% CI, 1.03-9.68). Particulate matter 10, ozone, and NO2 did not show any statistical significance. Odds ratios remained statistically significant when further adjusting for PM10 and ozone, but not NO2. Dose-dependent curves largely did not show a statistical significance; however, they did trend towards increased exposure of PM2.5 leading to an elevated OR. Conclusion This study showed that PM2.5 exposure is a major independent contributor to the development of CRS. Exposure to elevated levels produced statistically significant odds even among smokers and remained significant when controlling for other measured pollutants. There is still much to be understood about the genesis of CRS. From a pollution exposure perspective, a prospective cohort study would better elucidate the risk of the development of CRS among those exposed to other pollutants.

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trang VoPham ◽  
Kimberly A. Bertrand ◽  
Rulla M. Tamimi ◽  
Francine Laden ◽  
Jaime E. Hart

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Liu ◽  
Lara P. Clark ◽  
Matthew Bechle ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
...  

All data used are publicly available. Demographic data are available via IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information Systems [<a href="http://www.nhgis.org/" target="_blank">www.nhgis.org</a>]; air pollution estimates are available via the EPA CACES project [<a href="http://www.caces.us/" target="_blank">www.caces.us</a>]).


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (13) ◽  
pp. 6001-6006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Tessum ◽  
Joshua S. Apte ◽  
Andrew L. Goodkind ◽  
Nicholas Z. Muller ◽  
Kimberley A. Mullins ◽  
...  

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5pollution. We use these results to explore “pollution inequity”: the difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial–ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a “pollution advantage”: They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a “pollution burden” of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5exposures declined ∼50% during 2002–2015 for all three racial–ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Liu ◽  
Lara P. Clark ◽  
Matthew Bechle ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
...  

All data used are publicly available. Demographic data are available via IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information Systems [<a href="http://www.nhgis.org/" target="_blank">www.nhgis.org</a>]; air pollution estimates are available via the EPA CACES project [<a href="http://www.caces.us/" target="_blank">www.caces.us</a>]).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Liu ◽  
Lara P. Clark ◽  
Matthew Bechle ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
...  

All data used are publicly available. Demographic data are available via IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information Systems [<a href="http://www.nhgis.org/" target="_blank">www.nhgis.org</a>]; air pollution estimates are available via the EPA CACES project [<a href="http://www.caces.us/" target="_blank">www.caces.us</a>]).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document