scholarly journals Comparison of National and Local Approaches to Detecting Suicides in Healthcare Settings

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e555-e560
Author(s):  
Natalie B Riblet ◽  
Brian Shiner ◽  
Bradley V Watts ◽  
Peter Britton

Abstract Introduction In order to address the problem of suicide, healthcare providers and researchers must be able to accurately identify suicide deaths. Common approaches to detecting suicide in the healthcare setting include the National Death Index (NDI) and Root-Cause Analysis (RCA) methodology. No study has directly compared these two methods. Materials and Methods Suicide reporting was evaluated within the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. All suicides were included that occurred within 7 days of discharge from an inpatient mental health unit and were reported to the VA through the NDI record linkage and/or RCA database between 2002 and 2014. The proportion of suicide deaths that were identified by NDI and found in the RCA database were calculated. Potential misclassification by the NDI was evaluated, whereby the RCA database identified a suicide case, but the NDI classified the death as a non-suicide. Results In the study period, the NDI identified 222 patients who died by suicide within 7 days of discharge, while the RCA database only detected 95 reports of suicide. A comparison of cases across the two methods indicated that the RCA database identified only 35% (N = 78) of NDI detected suicides (N = 222). Conversely, the RCA database detected 13 suicide cases that the NDI had coded as deaths due to accidental poisoning or other causes. Importantly, RCA accounted for 13% (N = 7) of overdose suicides identified in all databases (N = 52). Conclusions Combining national and local approaches to detect suicide may help to improve the classification of suicide deaths in the healthcare setting.

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 531-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Bagian ◽  
John Gosbee ◽  
Caryl Z. Lee ◽  
Linda Williams ◽  
Scott D. McKnight ◽  
...  

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001590
Author(s):  
Ilgin G Arslan ◽  
Rianne M Rozendaal ◽  
Marienke van Middelkoop ◽  
Saskia A G Stitzinger ◽  
Maarten-Paul Van de Kerkhove ◽  
...  

To provide an overview of quality indicators (QIs) for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) care and to highlight differences in healthcare settings. A database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar, OpenGrey and Prospective Trial Register, up to March 2020. Studies developing or adapting existing QI(s) for patients with osteoarthritis were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were categorised into healthcare settings. QIs from included studies were categorised into structure, process and outcome of care. Within these categories, QIs were grouped into themes (eg, physical therapy). A narrative synthesis was used to describe differences and similarities between healthcare settings. We included 20 studies with a total of 196 QIs mostly related to the process of care in different healthcare settings. Few studies included patients’ perspectives. Rigorous methods for evidence synthesis to develop QIs were rarely used. Narrative analysis showed differences in QIs between healthcare settings with regard to exercise therapy, weight counselling, referral to laboratory tests and ‘do not do’ QIs. Differences within the same healthcare setting were identified on radiographic assessment. The heterogeneity in QIs emphasise the necessity to carefully select QIs for KHOA depending on the healthcare setting. This review provides an overview of QIs outlined to their healthcare settings to support healthcare providers and policy makers in selecting the contextually appropriate QIs to validly monitor the quality of KHOA care. We strongly recommend to review QIs against the most recent guidelines before implementing them into practice.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255936
Author(s):  
Wilson Sim ◽  
Wen Hui Lim ◽  
Cheng Han Ng ◽  
Yip Han Chin ◽  
Clyve Yu Leon Yaow ◽  
...  

Objective To understand racial bias in clinical settings from the perspectives of minority patients and healthcare providers to inspire changes in the way healthcare providers interact with their patients. Methods Articles on racial bias were searched on Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science. Full text review and quality appraisal was conducted, before data was synthesized and analytically themed using the Thomas and Harden methodology. Results 23 articles were included, involving 1,006 participants. From minority patients’ perspectives, two themes were generated: 1) alienation of minorities due to racial supremacism and lack of empathy, resulting in inadequate medical treatment; 2) labelling of minority patients who were stereotyped as belonging to a lower socio-economic class and having negative behaviors. From providers’ perspectives, one theme recurred: the perpetuation of racial fault lines by providers. However, some patients and providers denied racism in the healthcare setting. Conclusion Implicit racial bias is pervasive and manifests in patient-provider interactions, exacerbating health disparities in minorities. Beyond targeted anti-racism measures in healthcare settings, wider national measures to reduce housing, education and income inequality may mitigate racism in healthcare and improve minority patient care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory W Hagley ◽  
Peter D Mills ◽  
Brian Shiner ◽  
Robin R Hemphill

2011 ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
R. Kilian ◽  
J. Beck ◽  
H. Lang ◽  
V. Schneider ◽  
T. Schönherr ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document