scholarly journals Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program: Building the Bench

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Christian Coles ◽  
Martin G Ottolini
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Military Physicians

ABSTRACT The role of physicians in the U.S. Armed Forces is diverse, encompassing a wide array of skills and responsibilities to provide superior healthcare to their patients and to advance military medicine. In addition to healthcare delivery and medical education, military physicians are engaged in public health, operational medicine, and cutting-edge medical research. Thus, clinical research is a crucial component of Graduate Medical Education (GME) and supports critical thinking (knowledge, skills, and abilities) and the development of leadership skills among U.S. military physicians. The Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP) education mission was established in 2005 with the overall goal of supporting the development and training of the next generation of clinical researchers in infectious diseases and related public health disciplines in the Armed Forces using several strategies, including didactic learning, mentored research, and research engagement. Through involvement in the IDCRP, infectious disease fellows, residents (e.g., surgical, internal medicine, and pediatrics), and Master of Public Health (MPH) students have continued their education and gained valuable skills related to clinical research. Trainees either conduct research with IDCRP mentors or participate in IDCRP-led practicum experiences, with research projects ranging from epidemiologic studies to microbiological assessments. Consistent with the needs of the Military Health System (MHS), and in accordance with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education goals, the IDCRP provides opportunities for medical and graduate students, residents, and infectious disease fellows to conduct mentored research within the MHS, as well as gain important leadership skills in the conduct of clinical research. Overall, IDCRP continues to further infectious disease research through the support and education of the next generation of active-duty infectious disease researchers in the MHS.

More Than Just an Intern: Utilizing the Post-Graduate Medical Education Model to Increase the Value of Field Placement Experiences for Public Health Program Graduates

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10S-12S ◽  
Author(s):  
John Dreyzehner ◽  
Christian Williams ◽  
Eric Harkness
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Field Placement ◽  
Post Graduate ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Field Placements ◽  
Recent Graduates ◽  
High Level

Internships and field placements are a critical component of public health education in that they help ensure that future public health workers are able to apply theory and concepts to practice. However, developing successful practice-based experiences is dependent on both public health agencies and academic institutions collaborating to identify the competencies students should possess on entry into the field. It also takes considerable time and resources from public health departments to make these field placements successful. Seeking to innovate on existing field placement models in an effort to provide a rich relationship between students and practitioners, the Tennessee Department of Health has developed a new fellowship experience for recent graduates of public health programs that draws on the multidisciplinary aspects of post-graduate medical education. The Commissioner’s Fellowship in Public Health provides recent graduates an opportunity for practical high-level experiential learning in place of—or prior to—additional academic work. The program has two overarching goals: (1) to address emerging needs of public health in the areas of health policy and primary prevention while providing leadership, professional opportunities, and practical experience to recent graduates that will serve as a foundation for a career in public health; and (2) to provide a high level, diverse, and extended post-graduate population health experience prior to committing to a particular field.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of evidence evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background: With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods: Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results: 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions: Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Crisis: The Pandemic Highlights the Unique Training and Skills of Military Physicians Afforded by Military-Specific Graduate Medical Education

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Shahbodaghi ◽  
Edwin Farnell
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Treatment Facilities ◽  
Trained Physician ◽  
Military Treatment Facilities ◽  
Military Physicians

ABSTRACT Military physicians trained in military Graduate Medical Education programs are uniquely prepared to lead in austere and chaotic environments based on formal and informal curricula taught in military treatment facilities. The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic highlighted this reality when military-trained physician leaders were challenged to lead change directly from the front.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals Integrating Public Health–Oriented E-Learning Into Graduate Medical Education

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (S3) ◽  
pp. S353-S356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calaine Hemans-Henry ◽  
Carolyn M. Greene ◽  
Ram Koppaka
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
E Learning

scholarly journals Meeting Personal Health Care Needs in Primary Care: A Response From the Athletic Training Profession

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-288
Author(s):  
Wade Green ◽  
Eric Sauers
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Training Practice

Context Review of the origins, history, and attributes of primary care demonstrates continued challenges for the future of primary care and care delivery. The profession of athletic training may benefit from a critical self-review to examine its readiness to assist in reinventing primary care. Objective To explore parity between primary care attributes and athletic training practice and promote a timely and relevant discussion of primary care and public health integration native to athletic training practice, competency-based education with an emphasis on milestones, and the development of clinical specialists to prepare a well-trained workforce. Background General practitioners developed educational reforms through graduate medical education that resulted in primary care as it is known today. Graduate medical education has refined its assessment of students to include milestones for the purpose of describing the progression of clinical competence with identifiable behaviors. The development of future clinical specialists in primary care will also involve competence in public health. Recommendation(s) Practicing clinicians and educators should begin to critically explore the congruencies between the primary care attributes and athletic training practice. It is important to conceptualize traditional models of care within the frameworks of primary care and public health, given that athletic training practice routinely engages patients at personal, community, and environmental levels. The athletic training skill mix should be purposefully presented within interprofessional health care teams in primary care so that stakeholders can appropriately integrate athletic trainers (ATs) at the point of first contact. It is plausible that continued structural changes in the traditional practice settings will be required to facilitate integration of ATs into primary care. Conclusion(s) The impact of ATs in ambulatory settings and primary care possesses a foundation in the current literature. The ATs are uniquely suited to create a symbiotic pattern of care integrating both primary care and public health for improved outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document