Volume as an Indicator for Outcomes for Severe Maternal Morbidity in the Military Health System

ABSTRACT Background Maternal obstetric morbidity is a growing concern in the USA, where rates of maternal morbidity exceed Europe and most developed countries. Prior studies have found that obstetric case volume affects maternal morbidity, with low-volume facilities having higher rates of morbidity. However, these studies were done in civilian healthcare systems that are different from the Military Health System (MHS). This study evaluates whether obstetric case volume impacts severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in military hospitals located in the continental United States. Methods This cross-sectional study included all military treatment facilities (MTFs) (n = 35) that performed obstetric deliveries (n = 102,959) from October 2015 to September 2018. Data were collected from the MHS Data Repository and identified all deliveries for the study time period. Severe maternal morbidity was defined by the Centers for Disease Control. The 30-day readmission rates were also included in analysis. Military treatment facilities were separated into volume quartiles for analysis. Univariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the impact of MTF delivery volume on the probability of SMM and 30-day maternal readmissions. Results The results for all regression models indicate that the MTF delivery volume had no significant impact on the probability of SMM. With regard to 30-day maternal readmissions, using the upper middle quartile as the comparison group due to the largest number of deliveries, MTFs in the lower middle quartile and in the highest quartile had a statistically significant higher likelihood of 30-day maternal readmissions. Conclusion This study shows no difference in SMM rates in the MHS based on obstetric case volume. This is consistent with previous studies showing differences in MHS patient outcomes compared to civilian healthcare systems. The MHS is unique in that it provides families with universal healthcare coverage and access and provides care for approximately 40,000 deliveries annually. There may be unique lessons on volume and outcomes in the MHS that can be shared with healthcare planners and decision makers to improve care in the civilian setting.

Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics Leadership Roles in Academic Military Treatment Facilities by Subspecialty and Gender

ABSTRACT Introduction Gender distribution in academic ob-gyn leadership positions has previously been examined in the civilian sector, but not in military medicine. Objective To characterize the distribution of department-level leadership positions by gender and subspecialty in academic military facilities in comparison to those reported in the civilian sector. Methods This is an observational cross-sectional study. We queried military obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) specialty consultants, for title and gender of personnel assigned to academic military treatment facilities. Roles were characterized by gender and subspecialty, and the proportion of female leaders was compared to published civilian leadership data. Results Women comprised 25% of Department Chairs, 45% of Assistant Chairs, and 42% of Division Directors. In educational leadership roles, women comprised 25% of Residency Program Directors, 0% of Fellowship Directors, and 62% of medical Student Clerkship Directors. Female department chairs were most often uro-gynecologists (44%) followed by specialists in ob-gyn (37%). Most female residency program directors were specialists in general obstetrics and gynecology. The proportion of women in leadership roles in military departments was not different than in the civilian sector. Conclusion In contrast to civilian academic leadership positions, Department Chairs were most likely to be uro-gynecologists. Similar to civilian programs, women remain underrepresented as chairs, Assistant Chairs, Fellowship Directors, and Division Directors and similarly represented as Residency Program Directors. Despite a smaller pool of women available to fill academic leadership positions in military ob-gyn departments, the proportion of women in leadership roles reaches parity with the civilian sector. This suggests that a greater proportion of women rise to leadership positions in military academic ob-gyn departments than in the civilian sector.

Outcomes of Heated High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients With Severe or Life-Threatening COVID-19 at a Military Treatment Facility—A Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Introduction The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced radical changes in management of healthcare in military treatment facilities (MTFs). Military treatment facilities serve unique patients that have a service connection; thus, research and data on this population are relatively sparse. The purpose of this study was to provide descriptive data on characteristics and outcomes of MTF patients with COVID-19 who are treated with heated high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC). Materials and Methods We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study at the Wright-Patterson Medical Center, a 52-bed hospital in an urban setting. We received approval from our Institutional Review Board. The cohort included patients admitted from June 1, 2020, through May 15, 2021 with severe or life-threatening COVID-19 from a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus 2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test who were placed on HHFNC during their hospital stay. Severe disease was defined as dyspnea, respiratory rate ≥30/min, blood oxygen saturation ≤93% without supplemental oxygen, partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <300, or lung infiltrates involving >50% of lung fields within 24-48 hours. Life-threatening disease was defined as having septic shock or multiple organ dysfunction or requiring intubation. Patients meeting these criteria were retrieved from a quality improvement cohort that represents a consecutive group of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the Wright-Patterson Medical Center. Results Our MTF managed 70 cases of severe or life-threatening COVID-19 from June 1, 2020, to May 15, 2021. Of the 70 cases, 19 (27%) were placed on HHFNC. After initiation of HHFNC, median SpO2/FiO2 was 281.8 and at 24 hours 145.4. Median respiratory rate oxygenation at these times were 10.7 and 9.4, respectively. Fifty percent required mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. Median intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days, with a maximum stay of 39 days. Median hospital length of stay was 12 days, with a maximum of 39 days. Conclusion Our retrospective cohort study characterized and analyzed outcomes observed in a MTF population, with severe or life-threatening COVID-19, who were treated with HHFNC. While the study did not have the power to make concrete conclusions on the optimal form of respiratory support for COVID-19 patients, our data support HHFNC as a reasonable treatment modality despite some notable differences between our cohort and prior studied patient populations.

A Case Series: Describing the Coronavirus Pandemic Response in Small Naval OCONUS Military Treatment Facilities

ABSTRACT Introduction The European SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak threatened military beneficiaries receiving care outside of the United States. Military treatment facilities located outside the United States were the first to respond to the pandemic, requiring immediate action to establish novel protocols. The purpose of this case series is to describe challenges, solutions, and future recommendations during a pandemic response at three small naval military treatment facilities located outside the continental United States (OCONUS). Results The analysis and discussion reviews challenges in information processing, communication methods and patterns, process changes, actions for staff protection, and change fatigue experienced during this time. Conclusions Recommendations for future work include filling the gaps in the evidence for a prolonged pandemic response and crisis management, such as the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, including best practices to communicate, maintain staff resilience, and manage or mitigate associated prolonged stress and uncertainty.

The Military Treatment Facility COVID-19 Response in an Isolated Rural Environment: Challenges and Lessons Learned

ABSTRACT The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains an extraordinary event that continues to strain healthcare systems worldwide. Unlike the military treatment facilities (MTFs) in the USA, which have ready access to tertiary care facilities, those MTFs in foreign countries confront a host of challenges in meeting mission requirements. In this article, we discuss the MTFs’ COVID-19 response in the rural environment of Bavaria, Germany. Relevant factors including regional and clinic response, force health protection, and contingency planning, which influenced the MTFs response, are identified. These factors are further analyzed from a “lessons learned” perspective, and recommendations to shape the future response to a pandemic are provided. This current crisis portends a future where pandemics may remain an omnipresent threat.

COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution: Bolstering the Air Force Immunizations Model

ABSTRACT From its emergence and declaration as a worldwide pandemic, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with significant medical and logistical challenges. Initial obstacles ranged from the need to develop testing platforms to the determination of effective treatments to decrease the significant morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. Due to significant scientific breakthroughs, the most recent pressing challenge has been the distribution of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to prevent the spread of the infection across the world. Historically, the U.S. Military has been involved in immunizations delivery to prevent disease among its troops. This experience has led to the establishment of programs designed to distribute safe vaccinations to service members and beneficiaries. It is upon this infrastructure that the Air Force (AF) medical community was thrust to devise and execute COVID-19 vaccine delivery implementation across all military treatment facilities. In the AF, specialty trained allergist and immunologists provide the technical expertise for the establishment and execution of the AF immunizations program. These medical professionals have the proficiency, knowledge, and experience to run efficient mass immunization events in order to provide vaccines in a safe and rapid environment. Despite this, significant challenges attributable to the variable and novel nature of COVID-19 vaccine logistical requirements have led to unanswered questions and debate that needed resolution before and during the launch of this program. Here we describe the process for establishing a mass vaccination program for COVID-19 vaccine delivery and our experience-based problem solving approach at a large AF military treatment facility.

COVID-19 Crisis: The Pandemic Highlights the Unique Training and Skills of Military Physicians Afforded by Military-Specific Graduate Medical Education

ABSTRACT Military physicians trained in military Graduate Medical Education programs are uniquely prepared to lead in austere and chaotic environments based on formal and informal curricula taught in military treatment facilities. The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic highlighted this reality when military-trained physician leaders were challenged to lead change directly from the front.

Identifying Best Practices in Pharmacy Experience: An Analysis of Military Treatment Facilities With the Highest Pharmacy Patient Experience Scores

ABSTRACT Introduction Pharmacy patient experience within military treatment facilities (MTFs) is a significant indicator of healthcare quality, as hospital admissions correlate with medication use (Budnitz et al., 2006) and pharmacists have a unique opportunity to influence patients’ health (Dalton & Byrne, 2017). To improve patient care across the military health system (MHS), we investigated best practices within MTF pharmacies with the highest patient experience scores. Materials and Methods Researchers performed semi-structured telephone interviews with pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and patient experience officers from three of the highest ranked MTF pharmacies according to outpatient satisfaction survey results to glean “best practice” approaches to patient care. Researchers utilized the Gioia approach as a guiding theory for qualitative analysis of the interview data, and the study was excluded from a requirement to obtain institutional review board approval due to the number of respondents in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 guidelines. Results Interview participants from highly rated pharmacies emphasized the importance of communication among and between staff and patients, staff engagement and morale, and supportive leadership at their facilities for creating a positive patient experience and clinical environment. Conclusion These findings provide valuable insights to improve public health in military-connected populations through improved patient care practices in pharmacies across the MHS. Initiatives aimed at improving health care for pharmacy patients should prioritize improved communication and structural support for team members to create patient-friendly environments, which enables pharmacists and technicians to connect with patients and positively impact health outcomes. Limitations include lack of comparison data for lower performing pharmacies; future research will explore practices at lower ranking pharmacies to provide insights into communication practices, environments, and staff relationships impacting patient experience scores as well as the role patient demographics (e.g., retirees vs. active duty) and characteristics including facility size play in potential improvements.

Actual aspects of traumatic pathology among servicemen of Ukrainіan Armed Forces in Joint Forces Operation

The use of these traditional peacetime methodological approaches to accounting and analysis of non-combat injuries has led to an underestimation of its high level in the planning of inpatient care for servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area of the Joint Forces operation (anti-terrorist operation). The purpose of the study is a general assessment of the place of combat and non-combat injuries (including poisoning) in the structure of cases of hospitalization of servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area of the Joint Forces operation and anti-terrorist operation. Statistical mathematical processing was performed using computer programs Microsoft Excel and STATISTICA (version 6, StatSoft, Inc.). Based on annual medical reports on 3/med form, the ICD-10 structure of Ukrainian Armed Forces servicemen treated in MTF located in area of Joint Forces Operation for 2015-2020 has been presented. Ranks of disease classes have been calculated. Based on medical reports according Temporary instruction on codification of battle injures, non-battle trauma and diseases in Ukrainian Armed Forces, the structure of casualties admissions to MTF have been pointed out. The leading places in structure of treated servicemen belongs to patients with diagnoses on XIX class of ICD-10 (1st place for 2015-2019, 2nd place in 2020) that was stipulated by relative high levels of non-battle trauma in troops on the East of Ukraine. The comparison of structure of servicemen treated in MTF located in and out area of Joint Forces Operation as well as with structure of adult population (over 18 years old) treated in civil hospitals has been conducted. Prevalence of traumatic pathology levels among patients treated in MTF located in area of Joint Forces Operation in comparison with others treatment facilities data has been revealed. For 2015-2020 the shares of trauma and poison cases in structure of treated servicemen in MTF located in area of Joint Forces Operation significantly decreased that was connected with gradual lowing of battle actions intensity and non-battle trauma level. Based on result of research the necessity to improve curative and diagnostic base of military treatment facilities in area of Joint task operation as well as medical report and non-battle trauma prevention systems has been concluded.