MO680INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF ICODEXTRIN PRESCRIPTION PRACTICE AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH FLUID REMOVAL, BLOOD PRESSURE, PATIENT AND TECHNIQUE SURVIVAL*

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Davies ◽  
Junhui Zhao ◽  
K P McCullough ◽  
Yong-Lim Kim ◽  
Ronald Pisoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
High Glucose ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Study Phase ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Fluid Removal ◽  
Study Enrollment ◽  
The Us

Abstract Background and Aims Icodextrin is designed to maintain ultrafiltration during the long dwell, especially when there is a risk of increased fluid reabsorption (fast peritoneal solute transfer rate, PSTR), without the need for excessive use of high glucose. Randomized trials have demonstrated these benefits but are insufficiently powered to investigate a clear impact on survival. We aimed to establish international prescription practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Method The Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) is an international prospective cohort study in collaboration with the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The current analysis was drawn from A/NZ, Canada, Japan, UK, and US in PDOPPS phases 1-2 (2014-2019). Patient demographics, comorbidities, lab measurements, clinic blood pressure, membrane function (both solute transport rate and ultrafiltration capacity), dialysis prescription details, urine and 24-hour ultrafiltration volumes were captured at study enrollment. Mortality and permanent transfer to HD (HDT) events were collected during study follow-up [median (IQR) = 1.1 yrs (0.6, 1.7)]. Linear and logistic models were used to analyze the association between icodextrin and blood pressure. Cox regression, stratified by country, was used to analyze the association of icodextrin with time from study enrollment to (a) death and (b) HDT, and adjusted for demographics, 13 comorbidities, transplant waitlisting, serum albumin, urine volume, facility size and % APD use, study phase, while accounting for facility clustering. Results Icodextrin was prescribed in 1,929 (35%) of 5,432 patients studied, but this proportion differed by country, being >44% in all except the US, where it was 17%, and by facility within countries. Patients on icodextrin were more likely to have coronary artery disease and diabetes, have lower residual 24-hour urine volume and function, use less high glucose, have faster PSTR and reduced ultrafiltration capacity, and have been on PD longer (PD vintage: median 1.19, IQR 0.50-2.76). Despite this, patients using icodextrin achieved equivalent ultrafiltration to those using glucose at every level of residual urine volume (see figure). The low use of icodextrin in the US was more than compensated for by much greater use of high glucose and overall higher ultrafiltration volumes at each level of urine volume. Icodextrin use was not associated with blood pressure (effects: 0.90 mmHg, 95% CI: -0.68, 2.47), mortality (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.23) and HDT (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.23). Conclusion There are important national and facility differences in the prescription of icodextrin, with the US a clear outlier, with less icodextrin and more high glucose use, resulting in higher ultrafiltration volumes. These practices and the targeting of patients with less efficient membranes for fluid removal may mask any potential survival advantage associated with icodextrin.

Taking Peritoneal Dialysis beyond the Year 2000

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Gokal
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Fluid Removal ◽  
The Past ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Year 2000 ◽  
Economic Considerations ◽  
Appropriate Prescription ◽  
Better Than

Over the past 25 years, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has steadily improved so that now its outcomes, in the form of patient survival, are equivalent to, and at times better than, those for hemodialysis. We now have a better understanding of the pathophysiology of peritoneal membrane function and damage and the importance of appropriate prescription to meet agreed-upon targets of solute and fluid removal. In the next millennium, greater emphasis will be put on prescription setting and subsequent monitoring. This will entail an increase in automated PD, especially for lifestyle reasons as well as for patients with a hyperpermeable peritoneal membrane. To improve outcomes, dialysis should be started earlier than is currently the case. It is easy to do this with PD, where an incremental approach is made easier by the introduction of icodextrin for long-dwell PD. In the future, solutions will be tailored to be more biocompatible and to provide improved nutrition and better cardiovascular outcomes. Finally, economic considerations favor PD, which is cheaper than in-centre hemodialysis. Thus, for many, PD has become a first-choice therapy, and with further improvements this trend will continue.

Relationship of Demographic, Dietary, and Clinical Factors to the Hydration Status of Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzana B. Asghar ◽  
Sandra Green ◽  
Barbara Engel ◽  
Simon J. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Solute Transport ◽  
Extracellular Fluid ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Hydration Status ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Fluid Removal

Objectives To establish which clinical factors are associated with an increased proportion of extracellular fluid (ECF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Design A single-center, cross-sectional analysis of 68 stable PD patients. Method Bioelectrical impedance measurements (RJL, single frequency; RJL Systems, Clinton, Michigan, USA) of resistance and reactance were used to determine the proportion of ECF comprising total body water (TBW) in 68 stable PD patients attending for routine clearance and membrane studies. All patients underwent detailed dietetic, adequacy, and membrane function tests. Blood pressure and antihypertensive requirements were also documented. Results Significant gender differences in body composition were observed, such that women had lower absolute TBW and fat-free mass per kilogram body weight, but proportionately more ECF for a given TBW, mean ECF:TBW 0.5 ± 0.03 versus 0.44 ± 0.05, p < 0.005. In view of this, patients were split into two groups, defined as “over-” or “normally” hydrated, either by using the single discriminator (median ECF:TBW = 0.47) for the whole population, which resulted in groups distorted by gender, or by using different discriminators according to gender (women: 0.49, men 0.45). In both analyses, overhydrated patients were older, had significantly lower plasma albumin, less total fluid removal per kilogram body weight, and higher peritoneal solute transport. When split by a single discriminator, the overhydrated patients had lower sodium removal and significantly less intracellular fluid volume due to an excess of women in this group who also had less residual function and had been on dialysis longer. Using gender-specific discrimination, overhydrated patients were heavier due to expansion of the ECF volume: 20 ± 4.1 L versus 16 ± 3.3 L, p < 0.001. Stepwise multivariate analysis found age ( p = 0.001), albumin ( p = 0.009), and fluid losses per kilogram body weight ( p = 0.025) to be independent predictors of gender-adjusted hydration status. Sodium intake did not vary according to hydration status. Conclusion Gender influences the assessment of hydration status of PD patients when employing bioimpedance, such that women tend to have more ECF. Taking this into account, age, albumin, and achieved fluid removal appear to be independently associated with hydration status, whereas peritoneal solute transport is not. Advice on dietary sodium should take account of hydration status and achievable losses.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Residual Kidney Function and Peritoneal Membrane Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirayut Phatthanasobhon ◽  
Surapon Nochaiwong ◽  
Kednapa Thavorn ◽  
Kajohnsak Noppakun ◽  
Setthapon Panyathong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Raas Blockade ◽  
Residual Kidney Function

AbstractWe performed a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies in adult peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of specific renin-angiotensin aldosterone systems (RAAS) blockade classes on residual kidney function and peritoneal membrane function. Key outcome parameters included the following: residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR), urine volume, anuria, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr), and acceptability of treatment. Indirect treatment effects were compared using random-effects model. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We identified 10 RCTs (n = 484) and 10 non-randomised studies (n = 3,305). Regarding changes in rGFR, RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were more efficacious than active control (SMD 0.55 [0.06–1.04] and 0.62 [0.19–1.04], respectively) with the protective effect on rGFR observed only after usage ≥12 months, and no differences among ACEIs and ARBs. Compared with active control, only ACEIs showed a significantly decreased risk of anuria (OR 0.62 [0.41–0.95]). No difference among treatments for urine volume and acceptability of treatment were observed, whereas evidence for D/P Cr is inconclusive. The small number of randomised studies and differences in outcome definitions used may limit the quality of the evidence.

Blood Pressure, Volume, and Sodium Control in an Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Population

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil C. Boudville ◽  
Peter Cordy ◽  
Kristie Millman ◽  
Laura Fairbairn ◽  
Ajay Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Water Volume ◽  
Automated Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Urea Nitrogen ◽  
Sodium Removal ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Urea Nitrogen Appearance ◽  
Total Sodium

Objectives To examine the control of blood pressure and volume, and the role of sodium removal in a single, large, contemporary, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) population where icodextrin is used liberally and there is a policy to avoid long duration glucose-based daytime dwells. Design Observational cross-sectional study. Setting A university hospital. Patients 56 APD patients, with a mean duration on peritoneal dialysis of 1.9 years; 50% were prescribed icodextrin. Main Outcome Measures Blood pressure, extracellular water volume (ECW)-to-intracellular water volume (ICW) ratio, and total (peritoneal and urinary) sodium removal. Results Sodium Removal: Mean total sodium removal, while low at 102.9 ± 64.6 mmol/day, showed a wide range, with 41% having a sodium removal of >120 mmol/day. Total sodium removal correlated with total body water, ECW, and ICW ( p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.025, respectively), as well as with height and weight ( p < 0.06, p < 0.01 respectively). On multivariate analysis, only ultra-filtration volume and urine volume were significantly associated with total sodium removal ( r2 = 0.67, p < 0.0001 for both). There was also a correlation between sodium removal and urea nitrogen appearance ( r2 = 0.31, p < 0.001), with urea nitrogen appearance in turn being closely correlated with ICW ( p < 0.001). Volume Status: The ECW/ICW ratio was 0.88 ± 0.17, which was not significantly different to that found in hemodialysis patients without clinical evidence of fluid overload, either predialysis (0.96 ± 0.16) or postdialysis (0.92 ± 0.16); p = 0.07 and 0.36 respectively. Blood Pressure: Mean ± standard deviation systolic blood pressure (BP) was 111.9 ± 18.2 mmHg and diastolic BP was 63.3 ± 11.9 mmHg, with only 4 (7%) patients having a systolic BP > 140 mmHg and 1 (2%) having a diastolic BP > 80 mmHg. Median number of antihypertensives was 1 per day. Blood pressure control and ECW/ICW ratio were similar in those with sodium removal >120 mmol/day compared to those with sodium removal ≤120 mmol/day ( p = 0.39 for SBP, p = 0.70 for diastolic B P, p = 0.24 for ECW/ICW). Conclusions We have shown that good blood pressure and volume control is achievable in a large contemporary APD population with liberal use of icodextrin and avoidance of long daytime glucose-based dwells. Neither low nor high sodium removal was associated with more frequent hypertension or volume expansion.

scholarly journals The Influence of Initial Peritoneal Transport Characteristics, Inflammation, and High Glucose Exposure on Prognosis for Peritoneal Membrane Function

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 636-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. José Fernández-Reyes ◽  
M. Auxiliadora Bajo ◽  
Gloria Del Peso ◽  
Marta Ossorio ◽  
Raquel Díaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
High Glucose ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
High Exposure ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Peritoneal Transport ◽  
Fast Transport ◽  
Glucose Exposure

♦ BackgroundFast transport status, acquired with time on peritoneal dialysis (PD), is a pathology induced by peritoneal exposure to bioincompatible solutions. Fast transport has important clinical consequences and should be prevented.♦ ObjectiveWe analyzed the repercussions of initial peritoneal transport characteristics on the prognosis for peritoneal membrane function, and also whether the influence of peritonitis and high exposure to glucose are different according to the initial peritoneal transport characteristics or the moment when such events occur.♦ MethodsThe study included 275 peritoneal dialysis patients with at least 2 peritoneal function studies (at baseline and 1 year). Peritoneal kinetic studies were performed at baseline and annually. Those studies consist of a 4-hour dwell with glucose (1.5% during 1981 – 1990, and 2.27% during 1991 – 2002) to calculate the peritoneal mass transfer coefficients of urea and creatinine (milliliters per minute) using a previously described mathematical model.♦ ResultsMembrane prognosis and technique survival were independent of baseline transport characteristics. Fast transport and ultrafiltration (UF) failure are reversible conditions, provided that peritonitis and high glucose exposure are avoided during the early dialysis period. The first year on PD is a main determining factor for the membrane's future, and the mass transfer coefficient of creatinine at year 1 is the best functional predictor of future PD history. After 5 years on dialysis, permeability frequently increases, and UF decreases. Icodextrin is associated with peritoneal protection.♦ ConclusionsPeritoneal membrane prognosis is independent of baseline transport characteristics. Intrinsic fast transport and low UF are reversible conditions when peritonitis and high glucose exposure are avoided during the early dialysis period. Icodextrin helps in glucose avoidance and is associated with peritoneal protection.

scholarly journals Pharmacokinetic and Dynamic of Furosemide in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Lamarche ◽  
Maude Pichette ◽  
Denis Ouimet ◽  
Michel Vallée ◽  
Robert Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Pressure Effect ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Residual Renal Function ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Blood Pressure Effect ◽  
Health Canada

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and bioavailibility of a commonly used oral furosemide dose (500 mg) compared to a 250 mg intravenous (IV) dose in PD patients with significant residual renal function (urine volume > 100 mL). We also evaluated the immediate blood pressure effect in these patients. The data were obtained from a study we performed for the homologation of a 500-mg dose of furosemide by Health Canada.

Peritoneal dialysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 4874-4879
Author(s):  
Simon Davies
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Dialysis Fluid ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Fluid Removal ◽  
Visceral Peritoneum ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms ◽  
Capillary Circulation

Peritoneal dialysis is achieved by repeated cycles of instillation and drainage of dialysis fluid within the peritoneal cavity, with the two main functions of dialysis—solute and fluid removal—occurring due to the contact between dialysis fluid and the capillary circulation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum across the peritoneal membrane. It can be used to provide renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease. Practical aspects—choice of peritoneal dialysis as an effective modality for renal replacement in the short to medium term (i.e. several years) is, for most patients, a lifestyle issue. Typically, a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis will require three to four exchanges of 1.5 to 2.5 litres of dialysate per day. Automated peritoneal dialysis and use of the glucose polymer dialysis solution icodextrin enables flexibility of prescription that can mitigate the effects of membrane function (high solute transport). Peritonitis—this remains the most common complication of peritoneal dialysis, presenting with cloudy dialysis effluent, with or without abdominal pain and/or fever, and confirmed by a leucocyte count greater than 100 cells/µl in the peritoneal fluid. Empirical antibiotic treatment, either intraperitoneal or systemic, with cover for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, should be commenced immediately while awaiting specific cultures and sensitivities. Long-term changes in peritoneal membrane function influence survival on peritoneal dialysis if fluid removal is less efficient (ultrafiltration failure), especially in the absence of residual kidney function. This is the main limitation of treatment, along with avoiding the risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis—a life-threatening complication of peritoneal dialysis, particularly if of long duration (15–20% incidence after 10 years), that is characterized by severe inflammatory thickening, especially of the mesenteric peritoneum, resulting in an encapsulation and progressive obstruction of the bowel.

Peritoneal Dialysis in Anuric Patients: Old Problems and New Perspectives

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 233-235
Author(s):  
Anabela S. Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Fluid Removal

Anuric patients are often excluded from peritoneal dialysis (PD) because of the fear that PD is inadequate to treat this higher-risk group of patients. However, advances in PD knowledge and technique allow better and adjusted treatments. There is now clinical evidence that anuric patients can be successfully treated with PD, while new solutions promise to mitigate some limitations of automated PD, such as sodium and fluid removal and preservation of membrane function.

Peritoneal Dialysis in the Patient with a Failing Renal Allograft

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 280-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon J. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Solute Transport ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Plasma Albumin ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Patients returning to dialysis treatment after a period with a functioning allograft represent a special case in the integrated care model of renal replacement therapy. They are known to nephrologists— and thus are ideal candidates for a timely commencement of dialysis—but they have had time to accrue additional cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, they have been exposed to prolonged immunosuppression. Purpose The present study aimed to establish the clinical outcomes of patients returning to peritoneal dialysis (PD) with failing allografts [survival, technique survival, longitudinal residual renal function (Kt/VR), peritoneal membrane function (solute transport), and plasma albumin] and to compare those outcomes with outcomes in new, contemporary patients. Setting The study was conducted in a single center where prospective collection of data now known to be important in determining outcome on peritoneal dialysis (age, comorbidity, albumin, Kt/VR, and solute transport) has been performed since 1989. Methods All patients commencing PD between 1989 and 2001 after failure of an allograft that had functioned for more than 6 months were identified. Outcomes in that group were compared to outcomes in all new PD patients and in all dialysis patients with failed grafts who were returning to hemodialysis (HD) in the same period. Results The study identified 45 patients with failed allografts: 28 were commencing PD treatment, and 17 were commencing HD treatment. Those patients were significantly younger than the 469 new patients commencing PD [FailedTx→ PD 41.2 years, FailedTx→ HD 38.9 years, NewPD 54.7 years; analysis of variance (ANOVA): p < 0.001]. We saw no significant difference in the survival of failed transplant patients commencing PD as compared with those commencing HD (log rank: p = 0.11). Kaplan–Meier plots of patient survival were better for failed transplant patients as compared with all new PD patients. When corrected using Cox regression, the survival advantage was seen to be due to age and comorbidity at start of PD. Pure technique failure (excluding death) was not different between the groups. Compared with all new PD patients, patients with failed allografts had similar longitudinal plasma albumin and a tendency toward an earlier increase in solute transport, but a more rapid loss of Kt/VR, ( p < 0.05 at 6 – 48 months). Conclusions Peritoneal dialysis would appear to be a good option for patients with failing allografts. Co-morbidity is the predominant determinant of survival. That finding underlines the need for attention to factors that might prevent accrual of cardiovascular risk during the post-transplantation period. The earlier loss of Kt/VR in those patients might be prevented by developing strategies of continued immunosuppression after commencement of dialysis, although infection risk is an important issue.

International comparison of peritoneal dialysis prescriptions from the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-319
Author(s):  
Angela Yee-Moon Wang ◽  
Junhui Zhao ◽  
Brian Bieber ◽  
Talerngsak Kanjanabuch ◽  
Martin Wilkie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Urea Clearance ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Us ◽  
Dialysis Outcomes ◽  
The Uk

Background: We describe peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription variations among Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) participants on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD; n = 4657) from Australia/New Zealand (A/NZ), Canada, Japan, Thailand, United Kingdom (UK), and United States (US). Results: CAPD was more commonly used in Thailand and Japan, while APD predominated over CAPD in A/NZ, Canada, the US, and the UK. Total prescribed PD volume normalized to the surface area was the highest in Thailand and the lowest in Japan (for both APD and CAPD) and the UK (for CAPD). PD patients from Thailand had the lowest residual urine volume and residual renal urea clearance, yet achieved the highest dialysis urea clearance. Japanese patients had the lowest dialysis urea clearances for both APD and CAPD. Despite having similar urine volumes to patients in A/NZ, Canada, Japan, and the UK, US CAPD and APD patients used 2.5% and 3.86% glucose PD solutions more frequently, whereas fewer than 25% of these patients used icodextrin. Over half of the patients in A/NZ, Canada, the UK, and Japan used icodextrin, whereas it was hardly used in Thailand. Japan and Thailand were more likely to use 1.5% glucose solutions for their PD prescription. Conclusions: There are considerable international variations in PD modality use and prescription patterns that translate into important differences in achieved dialysis clearances. Ongoing recruitment of additional PDOPPS participants and accrual of follow-up time will allow us to test the associations between specific PD prescription regimens and clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document