P14.62 Overall survival from glioblastoma: partial resection versus biopsy

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii49-ii50
Author(s):  
L S Bjorland ◽  
Ø Fluge ◽  
K D Kurz ◽  
B Gilje ◽  
R Mahesparan ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Maximal safe resection is standard of care in patients with glioblastoma. Partial resection or biopsy are alternative surgical approaches when macroscopic complete resection is unachievable. Survival benefit from partial resection remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate overall survival from glioblastoma in patients having undergone partial resection compared to biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma having undergone partial resection or biopsy in Western Norway between 1.1.2007 and 31.12.2014. Clinical characteristics and radiology reports were extracted from electronic medical records. Categorical data were compared by chi square test or Fishers exact test, and continuous data by non-parametric tests. Kaplan Meier method and log rank test were used for survival analyses. RESULTS We identified 158 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma and having undergone biopsy or partial resection. Biopsy was performed in 52 patients (32.9%) and partial resection in 106 patients (67.1%). Median age (range) was 62.5 (18.1–82.3) in the biopsy group and 62.2 (27.9–85.1) in the partial resection group (p=0.90). Median Charlson comorbidity score was four in both groups. Multifocality was observed in 46.2% of patients in the biopsy group, compared to 27.4% of patients in the partial resection group (p=0.02). Deep-seated tumour localisation was also more frequent in the biopsy group than in the partial resection group, seen in 17.3% vs 5.7% of the patients (p=0.04). There was no difference in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) treatment between the groups. CRT according to the Stupp protocol, less intensive CRT and best supportive care was performed in 36.5%, 50.0% and 13.5% of patients in the biopsy group, compared to 45.3%, 49.1% and 5.7% in the partial resection group (p=0.20). Median overall survival in the biopsy group was 8.1 months (95% CI 5.2–11.1) compared to 11.1 months (95% CI 9.4–12.8) in the partial resection group (p=0.19). Median survival in the biopsy group was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.1–17.5), 6.5 months (95% CI 3.6–9.4), and 3.5 months (95% CI 0.0–7.7) for patients receiving CRT according to Stupp protocol, less-intensive CRT and best supportive care, respectively (p<0.001). The corresponding numbers in the partial resection group were 15.1 months (95% CI 13.2–16.9), 9.1 months (95% CI 7.5–10.6), and 1.5 month (95% CI 0.0–4.7) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Median overall survival was slightly longer in patients having undergone partial resection compared to biopsy, however not statistically significant. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the survival benefit from partial resection.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Shi Chen ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Chuansheng Zheng

Abstract Background Surgery for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited. Recently, the possibility was advanced that surgical approach could be applied in HCC patients more widely. To address this issue, the trends in the use of surgery (including liver resection and ablation et, al) and liver resection for the treatment of HCC with time was analyzed. Additionally, whether patients gain a better survival benefit from surgery and liver resection than other treatments was evaluated. Methods Data from SEER registries was used to analyze the trends in the use surgery and liver resection for HCC and the survival benefits of these procedures. The study included patients between the ages of 35 and 84 years diagnosed as HCC between 1998 and 2015 (n = 80499). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Results From 1998 to 2015, the rate of surgery for HCC increased in all patients (P = 0.016) and in the localized group (P < 0.001), but decrease in the regional and distant groups (P < 0.001). Liver resection rate in the localized, regional, distant, and unknown/unstaged groups declined (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, P = 0.014, and P = 0.007, respectively). Surgery and liver resection rates in the localized group and its subgroups of localized group were reduced (all P < 0.05). The median overall survival (mOS) of patients undergoing surgery was longer than patients with non-surgery. Similar survival results were obtained in the analysis of the subgroups. The liver resection group had the longest mOS in all patients and in the localized (and it’s subgroups) and regional groups. Conclusion Although surgery rate in HCC patients increased slightly with time, liver resection rate in the localized group decreased. Surgery might be used more widely in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Giorgio Hallaert ◽  
Harry Pinson ◽  
Dimitri Vanhauwaert ◽  
Caroline Van den Broecke ◽  
Dirk Van Roost ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-460
Author(s):  
Joaquim Bellmunt Molins ◽  
Jesús García-Donas Jiménez ◽  
Begoña P. Valderrama ◽  
Juan Antonio Virizuela Echaburu ◽  
Susana Hernando-Polo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6572-6572
Author(s):  
Steven Duffy ◽  
Puneet Bains ◽  
Brian Pavlovitz ◽  
Neerja Vajpayee ◽  
Nancy Newman ◽  
...  

6572 Background: Optimal treatment of older adults with AML remains challenging. While AML tends to be a disease of older adults, this population experiences greater treatment-related toxicity and worse overall survival than younger patients. Only fit older adults enter clinical trials and thus the results may not apply to the entire population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients > 60 years with AML (APL excluded) diagnosed prior to 2008 with IRB approval. The association of clinical factors (age, sex, comorbidities, prior chemotherapy), leukemia (prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm, cytogenetics, WBC count), and therapy (induction chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, and best supportive care) as they relate to overall survival was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Of 87 patients (median age 73), 45% were male, 58% had high risk cytogenetics, 38% had prior MDS/MPD, 92% were chemotherapy naive, and 21% were in the high/very high Charlson risk class. The majority (67%) received standard dose induction chemotherapy (IC), 9% received (palliative intent) low-dose chemotherapy (LDC), and 24% received best supportive care (BSC). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 2.5 months. On bivariate analysis high WBC (>50,000 at presentation) was negatively associated (1.0 vs 2.7 months p <0.01) with survival. OS for IC, LDC, and BSC were 3.1, 2.8, and 0.7 months, respectively (p=0.001). On multivariable analysis, IC conferred longer survival when compared to LDC and BSC combined (OR 0.33 CI 0.2-0.6, p<0.001). High WBC was associated with a decreased survival time (OR 2.96 CI 1.6-5.5, p=0.02). Mortality during induction or consolidation chemotherapy was 38%. At 5-year follow-up, only 4 patients were alive. Conclusions: In a non-clinical trial setting, OS of older adults with AML remains dismal. While IC offers a chance of longer survival, mortality with IC is unacceptably high. Further studies are required to identify and validate tools for risk stratification in older adults with AML as well as to utilize therapies with an improved toxicity profile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Kun Dong ◽  
Guan Wang ◽  
Zeng Liang Wang ◽  
Xueyan Wang

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in comparison with dinutuximab with chemotherapy in Chinese children with advanced neuroblastoma. The patients aged less than 16 years who were histologically diagnosed with advanced neuroblastoma were enrolled and randomized to receive either regorafenib plus best supportive care or dinutuximab plus chemotherapy plus best supportive care in a 1:1 ratio. The tumor response assessment was made in accordance with modified international neuroblastoma response criteria. Adverse events were also assessed. Regorafenib showed prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival than who received dinutuximab plus chemotherapy (overall survival: median 32.3 months versus 27.2 months; hazard ratio = 0.45; 95% CI 0.11-0.13, p<0.001; progression-free survival: stratified hazard ratio = 0.48; 95% CI 0.11-0.14; p<0.01).  Moreover, the overall response rate was greater in patients treated with regorafenib as compared to dinutuximab group. Regorafenib appears efficacious and has a manageable safety profile in Chinese children with advanced neuroblastoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 4409-4418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Angela Dalia Ricci ◽  
Ilaria Maggio ◽  
Maria Massucci ◽  
...  

Aim: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of third-line (TLT) and salvage treatment (ST) in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Materials & methods: Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials assessing TLT and ST versus placebo or best supportive care. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival, objective response rate and disease control rate in TLT; progression-free survival in ST; grade 3–4 adverse events in ST. Results: The use of TLT and ST was superior to placebo or best supportive care in terms of prolonging overall survival and progression-free survival. Hematological toxicities were more frequent in ST. Conclusion: TLT and ST are considerable and tolerable treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Given the substantial heterogeneities affecting the efficacy analyses, these results have to be interpreted cautiously.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document