High-Dose Nadroparin Following Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Benefits Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Post ◽  
IJsbrand A.J Zijlstra ◽  
Rene van den Berg ◽  
Bert A Coert ◽  
Dagmar Verbaan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Aneurysm Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the major causes of delayed morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of high-dose nadroparin treatment following endovascular aneurysm treatment on the occurrence of DCI and clinical outcome. METHODS Medical records of 158 adult patients with an aSAH were retrospectively analyzed. Those patients treated endovascularly for their ruptured aneurysm were included in this study. They received either high-dose (twice daily 5700 AxaIE) or low-dose (once daily 2850 AxaIE) nadroparin treatment after occlusion of the aneurysm. Medical charts were reviewed and imaging was scored by 2 independent neuroradiologists. Data with respect to in-hospital complications, peri-procedural complications, discharge location, and mortality were collected. RESULTS Ninety-three patients had received high-dose nadroparin, and 65 patients prophylactic low-dose nadroparin. There was no significant difference in clinical DCI occurrence between patients treated with high-dose (34%) and low-dose (31%) nadroparin. More patients were discharged to home in patients who received high-dose nadroparin (40%) compared to low-dose (17%; odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.36-7.24). Furthermore, mortality was lower in the high-dose group (5%) compared to the low-dose group (23%; OR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.55), also after adjusting for neurological status on admission (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.63). CONCLUSION Patients who were treated with high-dose nadroparin after endovascular treatment for aneurysmal SAH were more often discharged to home and showed lower mortality. High-dose nadroparin did not, however, show a decrease in the occurrence of clinical DCI after aSAH. A randomized controlled trial seems warranted.

scholarly journals Impact of Goal-Directed Therapy on Delayed Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2287-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Anetsberger ◽  
Jens Gempt ◽  
Manfred Blobner ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
Ralf Bogdanski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Purpose: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is the most important cause for a poor clinical outcome after a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess whether goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT), as compared to standard clinical care, reduces the rate of DCI after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients >18 years of age with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were enrolled and randomly assigned to standard therapy or GDHT. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring and predefined GDHT algorithms were applied in the GDHT group. The primary end point was the occurrence of DCI. Functional outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 3 months after discharge. Results: In total, 108 patients were randomized to the control (n=54) or GDHT group (n=54). The primary outcome (DCI) occurred in 13% of the GDHT group and in 32% of the control group patients (odds ratio, 0.324 [95% CI, 0.11–0.86]; P =0.021). Even after adjustment for confounding parameters, GDHT was found to be superior to standard therapy (hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% CI, 1.18–6.86]; P =0.02). The GOS was assessed 3 months after discharge in 107 patients; it showed more patients with a low disability (GOS 5, minor or no deficits) than patients with higher deficits (GOS 1–4) in the GDHT group compared with the control group (GOS 5, 66% versus 44%; GOS 1–4, 34% versus 56%; P =0.025). There was no significant difference in mortality between the groups. Conclusions: GDHT reduced the rate of DCI after subarachnoid hemorrhage with a better functional outcome (GOS=5) 3 months after discharge. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01832389.

A randomized trial of two doses of nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 788-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Clarke Haley ◽  
Neal F. Kassell ◽  
James C. Torner ◽  
Laura L. Truskowski ◽  
Teresa P. Germanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Symptomatic Vasospasm ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Fine Print

✓ High-dose intravenous nicardipine has been shown to reduce the incidence of angiographic and symptomatic vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but treatment may be complicated by side effects, including hypotension or pulmonary edema/azotemia. From August, 1989, to January, 1991, 365 patients at 21 neurosurgical centers were entered into a randomized double-blind trial comparing high-dose (0.15 mg/kg/hr) nicardipine with a 50% lower dose (0.075 mg/kg/hr) administered by continuous intravenous infusion for up to 14 days following SAH. Patients in all neurological grades were eligible for the study. During the study period, 184 patients were randomly assigned to receive high-dose nicardipine and 181 to receive the low dose. There were no significant differences in patient age, admission neurological condition, or amount and distribution of blood clot on initial computerized tomography scan. Patients in the high-dose group received a significantly smaller proportion of the planned dose than those in the low-dose group (80% ± 0.2% vs. 86% ± 0.2%, p < 0.05), largely because of premature treatment termination after adverse medical events. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm was 31% in both groups, and the overall 3-month outcomes were nearly identical. These data suggest that, from a clinical standpoint, the results of high-dose and low-dose nicardipine treatment are virtually equivalent, but administration of low-dose nicardipine is attended by fewer side effects.

Cerebrospinal fluid macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a potential predictor of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1786-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Kwan ◽  
Orseola Arapi ◽  
Katherine E. Wagner ◽  
Julia Schneider ◽  
Heustein L. Sy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Migration Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Macrophage Migration ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVEIn patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), poor outcomes have been shown to be correlated with subsequent cerebral vasospasm (CV) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The identification of novel biomarkers may aid in the prediction of which patients are vulnerable to developing vasospasm, cerebral ischemia, and neurological deterioration.METHODSIn this prospective clinical study at North Shore University Hospital, patients with aSAH or normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) with external ventricular drains were enrolled. The concentration of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in CSF was assessed for correlation with CV or DCI, the primary outcome measures.RESULTSTwenty-five patients were enrolled in the aSAH group and 9 were enrolled in the NPH group. There was a significant increase in aggregate CSF MIF concentration in patients with aSAH versus those with NPH (24.4 ± 19.2 vs 2.3 ± 1.1 ng/ml, p < 0.0002). Incidence of the day of peak MIF concentration significantly correlated with the onset of clinical vasospasm (rho = 0.778, p < 0.0010). MIF concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with versus those without evidence of DCI (18.7 ± 4.93 vs 8.86 ± 1.28 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.0025). There was a significant difference in MIF concentrations between patients with infection versus those without infection (16.43 ± 4.21 vs 8.5 ± 1.22 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.0119).CONCLUSIONSPreliminary evidence from this study suggests that CSF concentrations of MIF are correlated with CV and DCI. These results, however, could be confounded in the presence of clinical infection. A study with a larger patient sample size is necessary to corroborate these findings.

scholarly journals A clinical comparison of high dose and low dose of Suxamethonium

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
RK Yadav ◽  
PC Majhi ◽  
D Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Suxamethonium having its rapid onset and short duration of action makes this drug unique amongst the neuromuscular blocking drugs described so far. However, use of suxamethonium is associated with a large number of undesirable side effects. Objective: To evaluate clinical effects of high and low dose of suxamethonium and to determine whether lower dose of suxamethonium can be used for any beneficial effects in terms of its various adverse effects e.g. cardiovascular responses, post-operative muscle pains and intraocular pressure. Methods: A total of 100 patients were included in this prospective study. All these patients on preoperative clinical evaluation were assessed to have adequate airway. All the patients were divided in two groups, low dose group (group I) and High dose group (group II) with 50 patients in each at random. A standard anesthetic technique was adhered to all the patients and following parameters were observed on comparative basis: a. Fasciculation and post operative myalgia. b. Cardiovascular effects, c. Intraocular pressure. Observation: The incidence of post Suxamethonium pain was significantly greater in group II. Increase in heart rate from baseline was significant in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the diastolic pressure but rise in systolic blood pressure was significant at all assessment times in both groups. This rise from control was statistically significant. Conclusion: Suxamethonium can be used in lower doses (0.5 mg/kg) in elective cases without airway compromise. It gives benefits of reduced muscle pains, cardiovascular responses and intraocular hypertension. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, 2013, Vol-9, No-2, 1-8 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v9i2.9677

Abstract T P352: Dantrolene for the Prevention and Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Feasibility

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Muehlschlegel ◽  
Raphael Carandang ◽  
Wiley Hall ◽  
Kini Nisha ◽  
Saef Izzy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Outcome Differences ◽  
Infusion Period

Introduction: Dantrolene is neuroprotective in animal models and may attenuate cerebral vasospasm (cVSP) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans. We evaluated safety/tolerability and feasibility of intravenous dantrolene (IV-D) after aSAH. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 31 patients with acute aSAH were randomized to IV-D 1.25 mg IV every 6 hours x 7 days (n=16) or placebo (n=15). Primary endpoint was incidence of hyponatremia (sNa ≤ 134 mmol/L) and liver toxicity (% patients with ALT, AST and AlkPhos >5x upper limit of normal). Secondary safety endpoints included tolerability, systemic hypotension and intracranial hypertension. Efficacy was explored by clinical, transcranial Doppler (TCD) or angiographic cVSP occurrence, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and 3-month modified-Rankin-Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests, generalized estimating equations and mixed models. Results: Between IV-D vs. placebo, no differences were observed in the primary outcome (hyponatremia: 44% vs. 67% [p=0.29]; liver toxicity 6% vs. 0% [p=1.0]). Numerically more AEs and SAEs were seen in the IV-D group, but did not reach statistical significance (16 vs. 5 AEs, of which 5 vs. 2 were severe; RR 2.2; 95% CI 0.7-6.7; p=0.16). Three IV-D vs. two placebo patients reached stop criteria: one IV-D patient developed liver toxicity; two patients in each group developed brain edema requiring osmotherapy. No differences in angiographic, TCD, clinical cVSP, DCI, or 3-month functional outcomes were seen. Quantitative angiogram analysis revealed a trend towards increased vessel diameters in the IV-D group after the 7-day infusion-period (p=0.05). Conclusion: In this small trial, IV-Dantrolene after aSAH was feasible, tolerable and safe, but was underpowered to show efficacy or outcome differences.

scholarly journals Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial to investigate safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Y. M. Woo ◽  
Joanna W. K. Ho ◽  
Natalie M. W. Ko ◽  
Ronald P. T. Li ◽  
Leo Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Asbtract Background There are limited neuroprotective treatment options for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific proposed pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve global functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of administering Cerebrolysin for SAH patients. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. Fifty patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the modified Ranking Scale (mRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score, occurrence of adverse effects and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Results No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43–5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for favorable six-month recovery i.e. a mRS of 0 to 3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI 0.79–15.01) were comparable for both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in MOCA neurocognitive performance (p-value: 0.75) and in the incidence of DCI (OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.28–2.59). Conclusions Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. However, the neutral results of this trial suggest that it does not improve the six-month global functional performance of patients. Clinical trial registration Name of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Registration Number: NCT01787123. Date of Registration: 8th February 2013.

Long-term effects of nimodipine on cerebral infarcts and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha Öhman ◽  
Antti Servo ◽  
Olli Heiskanen
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Cerebral Infarcts ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type

✓ A total of 213 patients with verified aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) of Grades I to III (Hunt and Hess classification) were enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of intravenous nimodipine on delayed ischemic deterioration and computerized tomography (CT)-visualized infarcts after SAH and surgery. The administration of the drug or matching placebo was started immediately after the radiological diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm had been made. Of the 213 patients enrolled in the study, 58 were operated on early (within 72 hours after the bleed: Days 0 to 3), 69 were operated on subacutely (between Days 4 and 7), and 74 had late surgery (on Day 8 or later). Eleven patients died before surgery was undertaken and one was not operated on. A follow-up examination with CT scanning, performed 1 to 3 years after the SAH (mean 1.4 years), revealed no significant differences in the overall outcome between the groups. However, nimodipine treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of deaths caused by delayed cerebral ischemia (p = 0.01) and significantly lower occurrence of cerebral infarcts visualized by CT scanning in the whole population (p = 0.05), especially in patients without an associated intracerebral hemorrhage on admission CT scan (p = 0.03).

scholarly journals Anesthesia modality does not affect clinical outcomes of intra-arterial vasodilator treatment in patients with symptomatic cerebral vasospasms

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
Corinne Fischer ◽  
Sonja Vulcu ◽  
Johannes Goldberg ◽  
Franca Wagner ◽  
Belén Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Vasodilator Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vasodilator Treatment

Background: Delayed cerebral ischemia and cerebral vasospasm remain the leading causes of poor outcome in survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Refractory cerebral vasospasms can be treated with endovascular vasodilator therapy, which can either be performed in conscious sedation or general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the anesthesia modality on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular vasodilator therapy due to cerebral vasospasm and hypoperfusion. Methods: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were retrospectively analyzed at time of discharge from the hospital and six months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Additionally, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was assessed 24 hours before, immediately before, immediately after, and 24 hours after endovascular vasodilator therapy, and at discharge and six months. Interventional parameters such as duration of intervention, choice and dosage of vasodilator and number of arteries treated were also recorded. Results: A total of 98 patients were included in this analysis and separated into patients who had interventions in conscious sedation, general anesthesia and a mix of both. Neither mRS at discharge nor at six months showed a significant difference for functionally independent outcomes (mRS 0-2) between groups. NIHSS before endovascular vasodilator therapy was significantly higher in patients receiving interventions in general anesthesia but did not differ anymore between groups six months after the initial bleed. Conclusion: This study did not observe a difference in outcome whether patients underwent endovascular vasodilator therapy in general anesthesia or conscious sedation for refractory cerebral vasospasms. Hence, the choice should be made for each patient individually.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of low dose versus high dose oxytocin regimen for induction of labour

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1948
Author(s):  
Paridhi Gupta ◽  
Indu Chawla ◽  
Sonal Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Regimen ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

ABSTRACTBackground: Induction of labour is an indispensable part of modern obstetrics and certainly one of the most frequently performed obstetric procedure in the world. Oxytocin, being the most common inducing agent with multiple protocols being practiced, further research is required for the establishment of better protocol with optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes.Methods: Randomized comparative study including 100 term nulliparous women (randomized into high dose, group-I and low dose, group-II with 50 patients in each group) was done. High dose regimen was started with 4mu/min with increment of 4mu/min up to a maximum of 32mu/min and low dose regimen was started with 2mu/min with increment of 2mu/min up to a maximum of 32mu/min. Induction to delivery interval was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes noted were rate of caesarean section, tachysytole with or without fetal distress, failed induction, maternal outcomes like need for instrumental vaginal delivery, PPH and choriamnionitis, neonatal outcomes like NICU admission, umbilical cord pH and apgar score.Results: There was significant reduction seen in induction to delivery interval among those induced with high dose oxytocin regimen. It was found to be 6.96±3.77 hours in group-I and 9.05±4.65 hours in group-II (p value 0.034). Though incidence of tachysystole was more in high dose regimen, it was not statistically significant. No significant difference was seen in secondary outcomes.Conclusions: On the basis of present study, high dose oxytocin regimen can be considered for induction of labour as it has same effects as that of low dose regimen with lesser induction to delivery interval.

scholarly journals Effect of high versus low dose of dexamethasone on clinical worsening in patients hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: an open-label, randomised clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102518
Author(s):  
Manuel Taboada ◽  
Nuria Rodríguez ◽  
Pablo Manuel Varela ◽  
María Teresa Rodríguez ◽  
Romina Abelleira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Group ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical Worsening

BackgroundLow dose dexamethasone demonstrated clinical improvement in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) needing oxygen therapy; however, evidence on the efficacy of high dose of dexamethasone is limited.MethodsWe performed a randomised, open-label, controlled trial involving hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia needing oxygen therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive low dose dexamethasone (6 mg once daily for 10 days) or high dose dexamethasone (20 mg once daily for 5 days, followed by 10 mg once daily for additional 5 days). The primary outcome was clinical worsening within 11 days since randomisation. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, time to recovery, and clinical status at day 5, 11, 14 and 28 on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (discharged) to 7 (death).ResultsA total of 200 patients (mean (sd) age, 64 (14) years; 62% male) were enrolled. Thirty-two patients of 102 (31.4%) enrolled in the low dose group and 16 of 98 (16.3%) in the high dose group showed clinical worsening within 11 days since randomisation (rate ratio, 0.427; 95% CI, 0.216–0.842; p=0.014). The 28-day mortality was 5.9% in the low dose group and 6.1% in the high dose group (p=0.844). There was no significant difference in time to recovery, and in the 7-point ordinal scale at day 5, 11, 14 and 28.ConclusionsAmong hospitalised COVID-19 patients needing oxygen therapy, high dose of dexamethasone reduced clinical worsening within 11 days after randomisation as compared with low dose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document