scholarly journals OTHR-11. Comprehensive Analysis of Driver Mutation Profile in a Cohort of Lung Cancer Patients Using Targeted Gene Panel Analysis with Focus on Brain Metastatic Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii16-iii16
Author(s):  
Marina Kazarian ◽  
Jin Cui ◽  
Irena Tocino ◽  
Amit Mahajan ◽  
Mariam Aboian

Abstract Purpose Approximately 228,820 people are diagnosed annually with lung cancer diagnosis and 135,720 die from their disease1. EGFR and KRAS targeted therapies have been shown to significantly improve treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but they don’t apply to the majority of patients. There’s a critical need to characterize the molecular signature of patients with lung cancer and to define the proportion of patients eligible for novel targeted therapies. Methods IRB approval was obtained to retrospectively extract data from tertiary hospital tumor registry from 2011 to 2017. Data collected included patient demographics, targeted next generation sequencing results (50 and 150 gene panel), histology, and biopsy location in the final 2,203 patients, 715 of which were manually checked. Findings 83.8% of patients in the lung cancer cohort that had targeted next-generation gene panel analysis demonstrated presence of at least one mutation. 50.9% of the patients in our cohort had a targetable mutation. There were 9.5% with hypermutated phenotype characterized as at least 5 mutations per sample. 1.3% of patients had at least 10 mutations per sample. We also characterize the distribution of mutations within brain metastatic lesions and demonstrate that brain metastases with hypermutated phenotype demonstrate larger volumes of edema and greater involvement of deep white matter than non-hypermutated brain metastases. Conclusion We present a comprehensive analysis of the molecular signature of lung cancer from a tertiary referral institution with focused analysis of brain metastases. Lung cancer brain metastases with greater than 5 mutations correspond to greater volume of edema and involvement of deep white matter.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21028-e21028
Author(s):  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Vineeth Tatineni ◽  
Patrick joseph Oshea ◽  
Xuefei Jia ◽  
David M. Peereboom ◽  
...  

e21028 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common primary tumor leading to brain metastases. Multiple genetic markers have been profiled in NSCLC patients for potential targeted therapies. EGFR is mutated in up 50% of NSCLCs, while ALK is mutated in around 4-7%. KRAS is the most commonly overexpressed marker, seen in up to 85% of all lung cancers. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between NSCLCBM patients with KRAS mutations, ALK mutations, EGFR mutations, and wildtype. Methods: NSCLCBM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. We collected information regarding molecular marker status, systemic therapies, and date of progression. We defined OS as the date of diagnosis of brain metastases to the date of last follow-up or death. OS and PFS were estimated by the Cox proportional model. Results: We found a total of 2989 NCSLCBM patients, 184 were KRAS mutated, 68 had an ALK gene rearrangement, 184 were EGFR mutated, and 1469 were wildtype. The respective median age was 64.3 years, 64.5 years, 58.2 years, and 64.2 years. Females made up 61.8% of KRAS-positive, 51.8% of ALK-positive, 63% of EGFR-positive, and 46.4% of wildtype patients. The median OS (mOS) in patients who were KRAS-positive, ALK-positive, EGFR-positive, and wildtype were 43.3 months, 119.2 months, 57.9 months, and 33.1 months, respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) for the same cohort was 38.0 months, 112.4 months, 55.3 months, and 30.5 months, respectively. ALK-positive patients showed statistically significant mOS (p-value (p) < 0.001) and mPFS (p = 0.002) when compared to EGFR-positive, KRAS-positive, and wildtype patients. Conclusions: Molecular mutations serve as both prognostic predictors and alternative targeted therapies for NSCLCBM treatment. Our retrospective study showed improved mOS and mPFS in NSCLCBM patients with ALK rearrangements when compared to patients with EGFR mutations, KRAS mutations, and the wildtype. While these results looked at patient outcomes with specific tumor markers, further investigation needs to be done regarding outcomes of specific therapies in each cohort, as well as, intracranial lesion response.


2016 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demet Tekin ◽  
Denise Yan ◽  
Guney Bademci ◽  
Yong Feng ◽  
Shengru Guo ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (17) ◽  
pp. 24860-24870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coureche Guillaume Kaderbhai ◽  
Romain Boidot ◽  
Françoise Beltjens ◽  
Sandy Chevrier ◽  
Laurent Arnould ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (27) ◽  
pp. 19223-19232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahrooz Rabizadeh ◽  
Chad Garner ◽  
John Zachary Sanborn ◽  
Stephen C. Benz ◽  
Sandeep Reddy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20522-e20522
Author(s):  
Yen-Jung Lu ◽  
Kien Thiam Tan ◽  
Chun-Jung Chen ◽  
Ren-Shiang Jhou ◽  
Yi-Ting Yang ◽  
...  

e20522 Background: Lung cancer boasts an arsenal of targeted therapies directed at various molecular aberrations such as EGFR mutations and fusion genes. Simultaneous assessment for genetic alterations provides biomarkers to assist clinicians in their treatment selections. Methods: A total of 43 FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) samples obtained from lung cancer patients in Taiwan were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS), using a compact panel encompassing 17 potentially actionable, lung cancer-associated genes. NGS was performed on the Ion Torrent PGM or Proton System with a targeted average depth of > 800x. Genomic alterations detected were categorized as single nucleotide variants (SNV) or chromosomal copy number alterations (CNA). Results: A total of 74 putatively actionable genomic alterations were detected across 38 patients (88.4%), which may predict sensitivity or resistance to established and/or therapies that are still in clinical development. 19 patients (44.2%) had tumors harboring activating EGFR mutations in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain – L858R substitution or exon 19 deletion, which may suggest clinical benefit to first- and second-generation EGFR TK inhibitors (TKIs). Three patients (7.0%) whose tumor had acquired the EGFR T790M mutation were advised to switch to third-generation EGFR TKI. Possible resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs via increased copy number of EGFR (14.0%, n = 6) and MET (11.6%, n = 5) were observed. Deletion or loss of CDKN2A gene were detected in 14 patients (32.6%), which may confer sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Inhibition of downstream effectors in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways were suggested for patients whose tumor harbored PIK3CA and/or KRAS oncogenic mutations. Conclusions: Next-generation sequencing using a compact panel of genes may be sufficient to identify biomarkers for targeted therapies selection for most lung cancer patients in Taiwan.


Author(s):  
Vyshak A. Venur ◽  
Manmeet S. Ahluwalia

Brain metastasis is a serious complication of cancer that causes significant morbidity for patients. Over the last decade, numerous new driver somatic mutations have been recognized and targeted therapies are changing the landscape of treatment in lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, which are also the three most common cancers that result in brain metastases. The common actionable mutations include the EGFR mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations in non–small cell lung cancer, the HER2 mutation in breast cancer, and the BRAF mutation in melanoma. However, most of the early trials with targeted agents excluded patients with brain metastases. With a better understanding of the biology, several recent trials of targeted therapy that focus on brain metastases have been reported and others are ongoing. Novel agents with better penetration across the blood–brain barrier are currently being investigated for patients with brain metastases. In this review, we discuss the current state of use and future directions of targeted therapies in brain metastases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document