scholarly journals 1231. In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales from Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Collected During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2017-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S705-S705
Author(s):  
Sibylle Lob ◽  
Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽  
Francis Arhin ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (Ebact) frequently co-carry resistance to antimicrobials from other classes, limiting treatment options. Avibactam (AVI) inhibits class A, class C, and some class D serine β-lactamases, while aztreonam (ATM) is refractory to hydrolysis by class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). ATM-AVI is being developed for use against drug-resistant isolates of Ebact, especially those co-producing MBLs and serine β-lactamases. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against Ebact collected in 2017-2019 from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 52 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China and India), and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2021 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. ATM-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL AVI. MDR was defined as resistant (R) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, colistin, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem MIC >1 µg/mL, and Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis with ATM or ceftazidime MIC >1 µg/mL. Results ATM-AVI was active in vitro against Ebact isolates from LRTI (MIC90, 0.25 µg/mL), with 99.97% of isolates inhibited by ≤8 µg/mL of ATM-AVI, including 100% of isolates that produced MBLs. ATM-AVI tested with MIC90 values of 0.5 µg/mL against subsets of cefepime-nonsusceptible (NS), meropenem-NS, amikacin-NS, colistin-resistant, and MBL-positive Ebact (Table). The tested β-lactam comparators showed susceptibility of < 78% against these subsets of resistant isolates. Results Table Conclusion Based on MIC90 values, ATM-AVI was the most potent agent tested against drug-resistant and MBL-positive subsets of Ebact collected from LRTI. The promising in vitro activity of ATM-AVI warrants further development of this combination for treatment of LRTI caused by drug-resistant Ebact. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Francis Arhin, PhD, Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of AR-709 against Streptococcus pneumoniae

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. M. Jansen ◽  
A. Verel ◽  
J. Verhoef ◽  
D. Milatovic
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Excellent Activity ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACT We investigated the in vitro activity of AR-709, a novel diaminopyrimidine antibiotic currently in development for treatment of community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections, against 151 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains from various European countries. AR-709 showed excellent activity against both drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant pneumococci.

scholarly journals 1609. Epidemiology and Susceptibility to Imipenem/Relebactam of Gram-Negative Pathogens from Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections – SMART United States 2017-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S799-S799
Author(s):  
Sibylle Lob ◽  
Meredith Hackel ◽  
Katherine Young ◽  
Mary Motyl ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
The Us ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Relebactam (REL) inhibits class A and C β-lactamases and was approved in the US combined with imipenem (IMI) and cilastatin for complicated urinary tract and intraabdominal infections. Using isolates collected as part of the global SMART surveillance program in the US, we evaluated the activity of IMI/REL against gram-negative pathogens (GNP) from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), including a comparison of isolates from ICU and non-ICU wards. Methods In 2017-2018, 27 US hospitals each collected up to 100 consecutive aerobic or facultative GNP from LRTI patients per year. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and breakpoints. Results Among 3878 GNP isolates from LRTI, the most common species collected were P. aeruginosa (Psa, 33.3%), K. pneumoniae (10.9%), E. coli (10.4%), and S. marcescens (6.9%). Susceptibility of GNP is shown in the table. IMI/REL inhibited 93% of Psa and Enterobacterales, which included 174 isolates of Morganellaceae that are not expected to be susceptible to IMI or IMI/REL. S. marcescens also showed low susceptibility to IMI, with improved but still reduced activity upon addition of REL. IMI/REL inhibited 83% of all GNP combined, 7-18 percentage points higher than the comparator β-lactams. Of the tested comparators, only amikacin exceeded the activity of IMI/REL. Only Psa showed substantial differences in susceptibility between isolates from ICU (n=486) and non-ICU wards (n=611), with 63.4% and 70.2%, respectively, susceptible to IMI, 71.6/78.7% to cefepime, and 64.2/73.3% to piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T). Susceptibility to IMI/REL was high in both settings (91.4/93.6%). Among Enterobacterales, susceptibility was generally similar in ICU and non-ICU wards (IMI/REL, 92.5% in both settings; IMI, 86.3 and 87.1%, respectively; cefepime, 89.9/89.0%; P/T, 88.7/87.4%). Table Conclusion Although resistance rates have frequently been reported to be higher in ICU than non-ICU wards, this pattern was seen in the current study only among Psa isolates. IMI/REL showed activity >90% against both Enterobacterales and Psa from both ward types. These in vitro data suggest that IMI/REL could provide an important treatment option for patients with LRTI in the US, including those in ICUs. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Katherine Young, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Mary Motyl, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals 1271. In vitro Activities of Ceftaroline and Comparator Agents Against Bacterial Pathogens Frequently Causing Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in Patients from a Global Population: ATLAS Surveillance Program 2016-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S724-S724
Author(s):  
Meredith Hackel ◽  
Gregory Stone ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Ceftaroline Fosamil ◽  
Comparator Agent ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is a frequent cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis are frequent etiologic agents of CABP. Ceftaroline fosamil is a parenteral cephem approved for treatment of patients with CABP caused by S. pneumoniae (including cases with concurrent bacteremia), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), H. influenzae, and some species of Enterobacterales. In this study we report the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparators against isolates from community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTI) collected through a global surveillance program. Methods Clinically relevant, non-duplicate, isolates cultured from respiratory specimens by clinical laboratories in 54 countries in 2016-2019 were collected by the ATLAS Surveillance Program central laboratory (IHMA, Schaumburg, IL, USA). In total, 2,636 isolates of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, MSSA, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were tested. The isolates (n/percent of total) originated from Asia/South Pacific (722/27.4%); Europe (1481/56.2%); Latin America (292/11.1%); Middle East/Africa (57/2.2%); and North America (Canada only) (84/3.2%). Ceftaroline and comparator agent MICs were determined by CLSI M07 broth microdilution methodology. MICs were interpreted using 2021 CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints. Results Ceftaroline and comparator agent in vitro activities are summarized in the table. Greater than 98% of S. pneumoniae and >99% of MSSA were susceptible to ceftaroline, including penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae based on a dosage of 600 mg every 12h. Sixty-four (24.4%) MRSA were ceftaroline-susceptible-dose-dependent (MIC 2-4 µg/mL) based on a dosage of 600 mg every 8h administered over 2h, with the majority from (n) China (70), S. Korea (19), Japan (10), and Chile (8). Three isolates, all from China, were resistant to CPT (MIC of 8 µg/mL). 99.2% of H. influenzae were susceptible to ceftaroline. Results Table Conclusion Ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against current pathogens associated with CABP from a global collection. Disclosures Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Gregory Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Electronic Guidelines (GERH®) to Improve the Clinical Use of Antibiotics in An Intensive Care Unit

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
Paola Navarro-Gómez ◽  
Jose Gutierrez-Fernandez ◽  
Manuel Angel Rodriguez-Maresca ◽  
Maria Carmen Olvera-Porcel ◽  
Antonio Sorlozano-Puerto
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Lower Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Tract Infections

The objective of the study was to evaluate the capacity of GERH®-derived local resistance maps (LRMs) to predict antibiotic susceptibility profiles and recommend the appropriate empirical treatment for ICU patients with nosocomial infection. Data gathered between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively studied to compare susceptibility information from antibiograms of microorganisms isolated in blood cultures, lower respiratory tract samples, and urine samples from all ICU patients meeting clinical criteria for infection with the susceptibility mapped by LRMs for these bacterial species. Susceptibility described by LRMs was concordant with in vitro study results in 73.9% of cases. The LRM-predicted outcome agreed with the antibiogram result in >90% of cases infected with the bacteria for which GERH® offers data on susceptibility to daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and rifampicin. Full adherence to LRM recommendations would have improved the percentage adequacy of empirical prescriptions by 2.2% for lower respiratory tract infections (p = 0.018), 3.1% for bacteremia (p = 0.07), and 5.3% for urinary tract infections (p = 0.142). LRMs may moderately improve the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy, especially for lower respiratory tract infections. LRMs recommend appropriate prescriptions in approximately 50% of cases but are less useful in patients with bacteremia or urinary tract infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document