1351. Use of Mail-Out Sexually Transmitted Infection Test Kits in a Telehealth Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Clinic

Abstract Background Standard of care for patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) includes HIV screening and testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at all sites of potential exposure every three months. We implemented a provider and pharmacist telehealth based PrEP program as part of the HIV, Hepatitis Specialty Telehealth Access Resource (H-START) Collaborative. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and care via telehealth, we had limited ability to collect pharyngeal or rectal swabs in clinic. We created mail-out kits including swabs and instructions for self-collection to test for rectal and pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis. Methods Kits were mailed out to patients between June 2020 and May 2021. Providers first confirmed patient comfort with self-swab collection during telehealth appointments. Kits included: an instruction sheet with visual diagrams for collection, swabs with appropriate labels; and a pre-paid envelope for patients to mail swabs back to our facility for laboratory testing. Prospective data collection included the date kits were mailed out to patients, the date of kit receipt at our facility and the test result. Charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine treatment completion. Results 54 self-swab kits were mailed to patients. 53 of the patients were male and the average age was 41.3 years old. 38 (70.3%) swabs were returned. The median time for return of swabs was 21 days (Range 2-289). Of those returned, 5 (13.1%) were positive and all 5 patients were treated for their infection. Conclusion Mail-out STI testing was effective in identifying STIs for a telehealth PrEP program and for maintaining standard of care practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. This model may increase rates of testing compliance for care provided via telehealth and decrease rates of STI transmission and complications. Better communication around returning kits in a timely-manner and understanding reasons for non-return warrant further investigation. Disclosures Monica K. Sikka, MD, FG2 (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Christopher D. Pfeiffer, MD, MHS, C. difficile Vaccine Trial (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

78. Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Children During the sars-cov-2 Pandemic: A Prospective Multicenter Surveillance Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.388 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S170-S171

Author(s):

Zaid Haddadin ◽

Jennifer E Schuster ◽

Andrew J Spieker ◽

Herdi Kurnia Rahman ◽

Laura S Stewart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Vaccine Trial ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Respiratory Illnesses ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Support Research ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background A state of emergency was declared in the United States (US) on March 13, 2020 in response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Healthcare providers had to alter practice patterns and research priorities. We assessed the frequency of acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) in children, notably those due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza, before and during the pandemic. Methods We conducted multi-center active prospective ARI surveillance in children as part of the New Vaccine Surveillance Network. Children < 18 years with fever and/or respiratory symptoms were enrolled in emergency department and inpatient settings at seven US medical centers over four respiratory seasons during 2016–2020 (Fig 1). Pandemic-related restrictions to patient access limited enrollment in some sites beginning March 2020. Respiratory specimens were collected and tested at each site for RSV and influenza by qRT-PCR. Data were analyzed by calendar weeks. We compared the cumulative proportions of RSV and influenza detection after week 13 in 2020 to the previous seasons using Fisher’s exact test. Figure 1. Numbers of Eligible and Enrolled Acute Respiratory Illness Cases, and Proportions of RSV and Influenza Detection by Week, Stratified by Study Season Results Of 44,247 eligible children, 25,375 (57%) were enrolled and tested for RSV and/or influenza. A total of 6351/25375 (25%) and 3446/25372 (14%) children were RSV and influenza-positive over the four seasons, respectively. In 2020, we noted a rapid drop in eligible and enrolled ARI subjects after weeks 11–13 (Fig 1). During weeks 13–18 in 2016–2019, the three-year average of eligible and enrolled subjects was 1802 and 978, respectively. However, over the same period in 2020, there were 675 eligible and 278 enrolled subjects, representing declines of 62.5% and 71.6% respectively (Fig 1). In 2020, there were no RSV or influenza cases detected in weeks 15–18, and the cumulative proportions of RSV and influenza detection after week 13 were lower compared to previous seasons (p< 0.001) (Figs 1 and 2). Figure 2. Cumulative Proportions of Weekly RSV and Influenza Detection by Study Season Conclusion There was a considerable decline in ARI visits and the proportion of RSV and influenza detection across seven distinct geographic sites during the pandemic compared with previous seasons. These findings might be attributable to social distancing measures to lessen the spread of SARS-CoV-2, changes in healthcare-seeking behaviors, and limited access to medical care. Disclosures Zaid Haddadin, MD, CDC (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)Quidel Corporation (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)sanofi pasteur (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) John V. Williams, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Advisor or Review Panel member)IDConnect (Advisor or Review Panel member)Quidel (Advisor or Review Panel member) Christopher J. Harrison, MD, GSK (Grant/Research Support, Infant menigiciccal B conjugate vaccine trial)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Infant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine trial) Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Meissa vaccines (Consultant)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant) Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH, Genentech (Other Financial or Material Support, I receive an honorarium for lectures - it’s a education grant, supported by genetech)Karius (Consultant)Moderna (Consultant)Quidel (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)Sanofi (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)

Download Full-text

525. Atovaquone for Treatment of COVID-19 (Ataq COVID-19) Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.724 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S363-S364

Author(s):

Mamta K Jain ◽

Hesham Sadek ◽

James de Lemos ◽

Darren mcGuire ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

Viral Replication ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Additional Analysis ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Standard Of Care Treatment ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background Our group performed an in-silico screen to identify FDA approved drugs that inhibit SARS-C0V-2 main protease (Mpro), followed by in vitro viral replication assays, and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in mice. These studies identified atovaquone as a promising candidate for inhibiting viral replication. Methods Enrolled patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to atovaquone 1500 mg twice daily versus matched placebo. Patients received standard of care treatment including remdesivir, dexamethasone, or convalescent plasma as deemed necessary by the treating team. Patients agreed to allow collection of saliva at baseline and twice a day while hospitalized or up to 10 days. Saliva was collected and RNA extracted for viral load (VL) measurement by Real-time PCR. Our primary outcome was to examine the between group differences in log transformed VL(copies/mL) using generalized linear mixed-effect models of repeated measures from all samples. Additional analysis of Atovquone plasma concentrations were examined and correlated with viral load and body mass index (BMI). Results Of the 61 patients enrolled; 41 were received atovaquone and 19 placebo. Overall the population was predominately male Hispanic with a mean age of 51 years. The two groups were balanced (Table 1) with regard to age, gender, race, co-morbidities, days from onset of symptoms, baseline oxygen requirements, and receipt of COVID-19 specific standard of care treatment. A higher proportion with diabetes was noted in the Atovaquone arm. The log10 VL was 5.25 copies/mL vs. 4.79 copies/mL at baseline in the atovaquone vs. placebo group. Although there was a decrease in VL over time, there was no differences between the atovaquone plus standard of care arm versus the standard of care arm (Figure 1). Additional analysis of atovaquone plasma concentration demonstrated a wide variation in atovaquone levels, inverse association between atovaquone levels and BMI (rho -0.44, p=0.03), and Day 5 concentrations and VL (rho -0.54, p=0.005). Figure 1. Mean viral load of COVID-19 over time of atovaquone (blue) vs. placebo (red). Table 1. Baseline characteristics Conclusion Although atovaquone showed promising in vitro antiviral properties for COVID-19, in this pilot study we did not detect a change in VL in patients who received atovaquone compared to placebo, possibly due to failure of patients achieve adequate drug levels. Disclosures Mamta K. Jain, MD, MPH, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; GlaxoSmithKline (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Vasgene (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator

Download Full-text

LB3. Baricitinib plus Standard of Care for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1644 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S808-S809

Author(s):

E Wesley Ely ◽

Athimalaipet V Ramanan ◽

Cynthia E Kartman ◽

Stephanie de Bono ◽

Ran Liao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Research Study ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Research Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Interventions to reduce mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are a crucial unmet medical need. Baricitinib (BARI) is an oral, selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor with efficacy in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Treatment with BARI 4-mg was evaluated in critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 with baseline need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods COV-BARRIER (NCT04421027) was a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and elevation of ≥ 1 serum inflammatory marker. In this newly completed substudy, enrolled participants (not previously reported) from 4 countries on IMV or ECMO at study entry were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-daily BARI 4-mg or placebo (PBO) for up to 14 days plus standard of care (SOC), which included baseline systemic corticosteroid use in 86% of patients. The prespecified exploratory endpoints included all-cause mortality and number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) through Day 28. Results Characteristics for 101 participants are shown in Table 1. Treatment with BARI significantly reduced all-cause mortality by Day 28 compared to PBO [39.2% vs 58.0%, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54 (95%CI 0.31, 0.96), p=0.030, relative risk (RR) = 0.68 (95%CI 0.45, 1.02); Figure 1A]. One additional death was prevented for every six BARI-treated patients. Significant reduction in mortality was also observed by Day 60 [45.1% vs 62.0%; HR = 0.56 (95%CI 0.33, 0.97), p=0.027, RR = 0.73 (95%CI 0.50, 1.06); Figure 1B]. Patients treated with BARI showed a numerical reduction in the duration of IMV and duration of hospitalization vs PBO and more BARI treated patients recovered (Table 2). No new safety findings were observed (Table 2). Conclusion Treatment with BARI+SOC (corticosteroids) resulted in an absolute risk reduction in mortality of 19% at Day 28 and 17% at Day 60 in patients with COVID-19 who were on IMV or ECMO at enrollment. These results are consistent with the reduction in mortality observed in the less severely ill hospitalized patients in the primary COV-BARRIER study population. Disclosures E. Wesley Ely, MD, CDC (Grant/Research Support)Eli Lilly (Other Financial or Material Support, Unpaid consultant)NIH (Grant/Research Support)VA (Grant/Research Support) Athimalaipet V. Ramanan, FRCP, AbbVie (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Eli Lilly and Company (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Novartis (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Roche (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Sobi (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)UCB (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau) Cynthia E. Kartman, RN BSN, Eli Lilly and Company (Employee, Shareholder) Stephanie de Bono, MD PhD, Eli Lilly and Company (Employee, Shareholder) Ran Liao, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company (Employee, Shareholder) Maria Lucia B Piruzeli, MD, Eli Lilly and Company (Employee, Shareholder) Sujatro Chakladar, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company (Employee, Shareholder) Vincent Marconi, MD, Bayer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Eli Lilly (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

983. Outcomes of Candida Bone and Joint Infections in Eight Patients from a Phase 3 Open-label Study (FURI)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1177 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S583-S583

Author(s):

John W Sanders ◽

Caryn Morse ◽

Oliver Cornely ◽

Philipp Koehler ◽

Robert Krause ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Joint Infection ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Review Panel ◽

Joint Infections ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Candida osteoarticular infections are often preceded by candidemia with the intervertebral discs and knee joints the most common area for candidemic seeding. Candida osteomyelitis has significant morbidity and diagnosis is often delayed difficult to treat. Treatment courses are usually long and there are limited oral options available for patients who have an azole-resistant infection. Oral ibrexafungerp is an investigational broad-spectrum glucan synthase inhibitor antifungal with activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, including azole- and echinocandin-resistant strains. A Phase 3 open-label, single-arm study of ibrexafungerp (FURI; NCT03059992) is ongoing for the treatment of patients with fungal disease refractory or who intolerant of to standard of care antifungal therapy. Table 1. FURI Bone and Joint Infection Outcomes Methods FURI subjects were eligible for enrollment if they have proven or probable, severe mucocutaneous candidiasis, invasive candidiasis or invasive aspergillosis and documented evidence of failure to, intolerance to, or toxicity related to a currently approved standard-of-care antifungal treatment or can not receive approved oral antifungal options (e.g., susceptibility of the organism) or a continued IV antifungal therapy is clinically undesirable or unfeasible. Results An independent Data Review Committee (DRC) provided an assessment of treatment response for a total 74 subjects enrolled in the FURI study from 22 centers in US, UK and EU treated with ibrexafungerp for mucocutaneous or invasive fungal infections from 2016- 2020. There were 8 subjects out of the 74 subjects who were diagnosed with various bone and joint infections, 5 subjects with spondylodiscitis, 1 subject with a knee/prosthetic joint infection and 2 subjects with bone infections, one of the tibia and one of the zygomatic arch. Table 1 shows outcomes for this patient group, five (75%) patients had a clinical benefit (complete or partial response and stable response), one (12.5%) had progression of disease and one patient was indeterminate. The median days of therapy for this group was 210.5 days. Conclusion Analysis of 8 subjects from the FURI study indicates that oral ibrexafungerp provides a promising therapeutic response in option for patients with bone and/or joint infections. Disclosures Caryn Morse, MD, Chimerix (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Covis Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Ridgeback Biotherapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Roche (Scientific Research Study Investigator)SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Theratechnologies (Advisor or Review Panel member)Viiv (Advisor or Review Panel member) Oliver Cornely, Prof., Actelion (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Allecra Therapeutics (Consultant)Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Basilea (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Biocon (Consultant)Biosys (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)CoRe Consulting (Consultant)Da Volterra (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)DFG (German Research Foundation) (Grant/Research Support)Entasis (Consultant)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Grupo Biotoscana (Consultant)Immunic (Grant/Research Support)IQVIA (Consultant)Janssen (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Consultant)Medicines Company (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini (Consultant)Merck/MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Molecular Partners (Consultant)MSG-ERC (Consultant)Mylan (Consultant)Nabriva (Consultant)Noxxon (Consultant)Octapharma (Consultant)Paratek (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)PSI (Consultant)Roche Diagnostics (Consultant)Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Wiley (Blackwell) (Other Financial or Material Support) Philipp Koehler, MD, Ambu GmbH (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Astellas Pharma (Speaker’s Bureau)Euopean Confederation of Medical Mycology (Speaker’s Bureau)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Noxxon N.V. (Consultant)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau)State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (Grant/Research Support) Jürgen Prattes, Dr, AbbVie Inc. (Shareholder)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)MSD (Grant/Research Support)Novo Nordisk (Shareholder)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)Stryker (Shareholder) Guenter Weiss, MD, MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Novartis (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau)Pharmacosmos (Speaker’s Bureau)Scynexis (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Vifor (Speaker’s Bureau) Nkechi Azie, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) David A. Angulo, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

561. Safety of Remdesivir vs Standard Care in Patients with Moderate Covid-19

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.755 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S345-S346

Author(s):

Gerard J Criner ◽

Mi Young Ahn ◽

Gregory Huhn ◽

Aruna Subramanian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Safety Data ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Liver Function Tests ◽

Similar Rate ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Open Label Phase

Abstract Background Remdesivir (RDV) has been shown to shorten recovery time and was well tolerated in patients with severe COVID-19. Here we report safety of RDV in patients with moderate COVID-19. Methods We conducted an open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT04252664) in hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, evidence of pulmonary infiltrates, and oxygen saturation >94% on room air. Patients were randomly assigned to receive RDV (5 or 10 days) or standard of care (SOC). RDV was dosed intravenously at 200 mg on day 1, 100 mg daily thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were evaluated through the day 11 data cut; safety data through day 28 will be presented at the meeting. Results 584 patients were randomized and treated (5d RDV: n=191; 10d RDV, n=193; SOC: n=200). Baseline characteristics were balanced among groups; median (range) age was 57y (12-95y), 39% were female and 19% Black, 39% had arterial hypertension, 15% hyperlipidemia, 11% asthma. Briefly, across both the 5d and 10d arms, RDV was well tolerated with a similar rate of Grade 3 or 4 AEs and fewer SAEs compared to SOC (Table). AEs more common with RDV vs SOC included nausea, headache, and hypokalemia. Overall, across the 3 arms, incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation and death were low and no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters were observed. In addition, median changes in renal and liver function tests from baseline were not statistically significant between the RDV 5d and RDV 10d groups compared to the SOC only group at d14 (Table 1). Table 1. Conclusion RDV given for 5d or 10d was well tolerated in patients with moderate COVID-19. No clinically significant safety signals were observed with RDV vs SOC. Disclosures Gerard J. Criner, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Gerard J. Criner, MD, NO DISCLOSURE DATA Mi Young Ahn, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Gregory Huhn, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Grant/Research Support)Proteus (Grant/Research Support)US National Institutes of Health (Grant/Research Support)Viiv Healthcare (Grant/Research Support) Aruna Subramanian, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Carlos Lumbreras, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Stefan Schmiedel, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Robert H. Hyland, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Vithika Suri, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Huyen Cao, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Hongyuan Wang, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Devi SenGupta, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Anand Chokkalingam, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Anu Osinusi, MD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Diana M. Brainard, MD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Yao-Shen Chen, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Yao-Shen Chen, MD, NO DISCLOSURE DATA Huldrych Günthard, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) D Jose Sanz-Moreno, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Judith A. Aberg, MD, Theratechnology (Consultant) Emanuele Nicastri, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Owen Tak-Yin Tsang, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Owen Tak-Yin Tsang, MD, NO DISCLOSURE DATA

Download Full-text

LB-19. Association between contract staffing and reported outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in a cluster-randomized trial of 965 U.S. nursing homes

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa515.1916 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S853-S853

Author(s):

Kevin McConeghy ◽

H Edward Davidson ◽

Lisa Han ◽

Elie Saade ◽

David Canaday ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nursing Homes ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Research Study ◽

Vaccine Trial ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Research Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Cluster Randomized ◽

Reported Data ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Nursing home residents account for 45% SARS-CoV-2 related deaths in the U.S. but only 0.6% of the population. Our research group conducted a large pragmatic cluster randomized influenza vaccine trial in 965 nursing homes (NCT03965195). Due to the pandemic and its impact after the influenza season, we prospectively collected reports of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and performed a prospective study on the association between contract staffing and reported outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2. We hypothesized those using more contract nursing care would have higher risk of an outbreak. Methods From February through April, we collected monthly facility-level, self-reported data on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. Facility characteristics were taken from public data from Centers for Medicaid and Medicare services. Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were identified using a LASSO variable selection procedure, with a generalized linear, Poisson family model. Facility characteristics evaluated include demographics (e.g. number of residents), influenza vaccination rates, quality measures (e.g. % with UTI), and functional status (e.g. % with tube feedings). Facilities with contract staffing hours in the upper 25% quantile of direct care (RN, LPN, CNA) were considered ‘heavy use’. Results Of 965 randomized NHs, 663/965 (69%) reported data on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. On average, 13% of facilities had at least one outbreak, with 5/842 (0.5%) outbreaks in February, 91/835 (10.8%) in March and 217/686 (30%) in April. SARS-CoV-2 (+) facilities were larger (average total beds, 151 vs. 117), but were mostly similar by functional and cognitive status. Occupancy rate, total residents, Influenza vaccination rate, % with UTI, receiving respiratory treatments, tube feedings, and Medicaid payers were adjusted for in the analysis. The ‘heavy use’ of contract staffing included those with >223 hours per quarter. A multivariable regression found the relative risk SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was 1.56 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.22, 1.99) with heavy use of contract staffing. Conclusion The participating nursing homes in our vaccine trial with SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were larger. Our study highlights that heavy use of contract staffing was associated with 56% increased risk of an outbreak. Disclosures Kevin McConeghy, Pharm.D., Pfizer (Grant/Research Support)Sanofi-Pasteur (Grant/Research Support)Seqirus Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support) H. Edward Davidson, PharmD, MPH, Sanofi pasteur (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Seqirus (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Lisa Han, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Grant/Research Support)Seqirus (Grant/Research Support) David Canaday, M.D., Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Research Grant or Support)Seqirus (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Vincent Mor, Ph.D., naviHealth (Consultant)

Download Full-text

1157. Clinical Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Fosmanogepix, a Novel First-in-class Antifungal, in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: Subset Analysis from a Phase 2 Candidemia Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1343 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S605-S605

Author(s):

Pierre Bulpa ◽

Galia Rahav ◽

Ilana Oren ◽

Mickaël Aoun ◽

George R Thompson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Renal Insufficiency ◽

Antifungal Agents ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Antifungal Treatment ◽

Successful Outcome ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Fosmanogepix (FMGX) is a first-in-class antifungal agent, with a unique MOA targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, and broad-spectrum activity against yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to other antifungal agents. Patients with candidemia often have underlying renal insufficiency or are receiving medications that affect renal function. This analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. Methods This global, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMGX for first-line treatment of candidemia. Patients with a recent diagnosis of candidemia defined as positive blood culture for Candida spp within 96 hrs prior to study entry with ≤ 2 days of prior antifungal treatment were eligible, including those with renal insufficiency. Patients with neutropenia, C. krusei infection, deep-seated Candida infections or receiving hemodialysis were excluded. Subjects were treated with FMGX for up to 14 days: 1000 mg IV BID for 1 day, then 600 mg IV QD for at least 2 days, followed by either 600 mg IV QD or 700 mg PO QD. Patients requiring antifungal treatment beyond 14 days received fluconazole. The primary efficacy endpoint was outcome at end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by an independent data review committee. Successful outcome was defined as survival with clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment. Results 14/21 (66%) subjects had some degree of renal insufficiency: 7 had mild renal insufficiency (GFR:60-89), 5 had moderate renal insufficiency (GFR:30-59), and 2 had severe renal insufficiency (GFR:15-29). 12/14 (86%) completed study treatment, and treatment was successful at EOST in 12/14 (86%) subjects. Decline in renal function was not observed at EOST. 4 had worsening of renal function during the follow-up period; none required dialysis. Renal impairment did not increase exposure of FMGX. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion FMGX demonstrated high level treatment success with no evidence of drug-related nephrotoxicity, with no dose adjustments required. These preliminary data support the continued evaluation of FMGX in patients with candidemia and renal dysfunction as an alternative to potentially nephrotoxic antifungal agents. Disclosures Pierre Bulpa, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Galia Rahav, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Mickaël Aoun, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Bart Jan Kullberg, MD, FRCP, FIDSA, Amplyx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Sara Barbat, BSN, RN, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Pamela Wedel, BSc, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Haran T. Schlamm, MD, Amplyx (Consultant) Michael Hodges, BSc. MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Employee)

Download Full-text

1608. Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Multiple Urban Hospitals

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1788 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S798-S799

Author(s):

Nicolo Cabrera ◽

Truc T Tran ◽

Travis J Carlson ◽

Faris Alnezary ◽

William R Miller ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Clinical Success ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Multidrug Resistant ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Research Support ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination developed for use against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). C/T is approved for complicated urinary tract and intraabdominal infections as well as hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonias. However, comprehensive clinical characterization of patients treated with C/T in non-FDA-approved indications is limited. Methods Patients ≥18 years who received C/T for ≥48 hours while hospitalized in 9 acute care centers in Houston, TX from January 2016 through September 2018 were included. Demographic, microbiologic, treatment and clinical outcome data were retrospectively collected by chart review. In patients who received multiple inpatient courses of C/T, only the first course with C/T was assessed. Results 210 patients met inclusion criteria: 58% were non-white, 35% were female and 13% were immunocompromised. Median age was 61 years (IQR, 48 to 69). Median Charlson comorbidity index was 5 (IQR, 2 to 6). At the onset of the index episode, a significant proportion of patients required intensive care unit admission (44%), mechanical ventilation (37%) and pressor support (22%). Respiratory sources were the most common (50%) followed by urine (15%). Positive cultures were documented in 93% of the cases and PA was found in 86%. Majority (95%) of PA which were MDR. C/T use was guided by susceptibility testing of the index isolate in ca. 52%. In 5.7% of cases, C/T was used to escalate therapy without any documented C/T-susceptible organism. Half (51%) of the cohort received initial dosing appropriate for renal function while 36% receiving a lower than recommended dose. Clinical success (i.e., recovery from infection-related signs and symptoms) occured in 77%. The in-hospital mortality rate in our cohort was 15% with 26 of 31 deaths deemed infection-related. Conclusion We report a large multicenter observational cohort that received C/T. A 77% clinical success with the use of C/T was documented. These data support the use of C/T in critically ill patients infected with MDR PA. Disclosures William R. Miller, MD, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Shionogi (Advisor or Review Panel member) Laura A. Puzniak, PhD, Merck (Employee) Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)

Download Full-text

1393. Factors Associated with Co-administration of Pentavalent DTaP-IPV/Hib and Monovalent Hepatitis B Vaccine in the United States (US)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1575 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S706-S706

Author(s):

Tanaz Petigara ◽

Ya-Ting Chen ◽

Zhiwen Liu ◽

Michelle Goveia ◽

David Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccination Schedule ◽

Provider Type ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Region Of Residence ◽

Birth Dose ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background The US vaccination schedule includes DTaP, IPV, Hib and HepB doses in the first 6 months of life. A previous analysis found variability in the timing of HepB doses in infants receiving DTaP-IPV/Hib. We explored factors associated with co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB on the same day. Methods This was a retrospective study using the MarketScan® commercial claims and encounters database. Infants born from 1 July 2010 - 30 June 2016, continuously enrolled in an insurance plan for ≥ 13 months and receiving ≥ 3 DTaP-IPV/Hib doses were included. Infants were assessed for HepB claims relative to the first and third DTaP-IPV/Hib doses. Because a HepB birth dose was assumed, the first HepB claim from 29 - 169 days following birth was counted as Dose 2, and the second claim from 170 days - 12 months as Dose 3. Associations between demographic, provider, and insurance characteristics, receipt of other pediatric vaccines, and co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results Among 165,553 infants who received a first DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 60.7% received HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Among 162,217 infants who received a third DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 45.1% received HepB Dose 3 on the same day. Infants in the Northeast were less likely (OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.36-0.39), while those in the West were more likely (OR=1.41, 95%CI=1.36-1.46) than infants in the South to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Infants vaccinated by pediatricians (OR=0.54, 95%CI=0.53-0.55) were less likely to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day compared to infants vaccinated by family physicians. Infants who received PCV on the same day as the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib were more likely to receive HepB Dose 2 (OR=6.96, 95%CI=6.30-7.70) that day. These factors were also associated with co-administration of the third dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 3. Conclusion Differences in co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were associated with region of residence, provider type and co-administration of PCV. The reasons underlying these differences merit exploration. A hexavalent vaccine containing DTaP, IPV, Hib, and HepB could improve timeliness of HepB vaccination, while reducing the number of injections during infancy. Disclosures Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Zhiwen Liu, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc., (Employee) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

673. Updated CLSI Ciprofloxacin Breakpoints from a Multicenter Assessment for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.866 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S391-S391

Author(s):

Maria M Traczewski ◽

Denise Beasley ◽

Amanda Harrington ◽

Sharon DesJarlais ◽

Omai Garner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Reference Panel ◽

Broth Microdilution ◽

Salmonella Spp ◽

Research Personnel ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Material Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Support Research

Abstract Background Updated US FDA/CLSI ciprofloxacin breakpoints were evaluated against data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilution panels prepared according to CLSI methodology. Methods MSDGN panels were evaluated at three clinical sites by comparing MIC values obtained using the MSDGN panels to MICs utilizing a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. Data from the combined phases of efficacy and challenge included 803 Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates tested using the turbidity and Prompt® methods of inoculation. To demonstrate reproducibility, a subset of 12 organisms were tested on MSDGN panels at each site during reproducibility. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1ºC and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually. Read times for the MSDGN panels were at 16-20 hours. Frozen reference panels were prepared and read according to CLSI methodology. FDA and CLSI breakpoints (µg/mL) used for interpretation of MIC results were: Enterobacterales ≤ 0.25 S, 0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; Salmonella spp. ≤ 0.06 S, 0.12-0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; P. aeruginosa ≤ 0.5 S, 1 I, ≥ 2 R. Results Essential and categorical agreement was calculated compared to frozen reference panel results. Results for isolates tested during efficacy and challenge with Prompt inoculation and manual read are as follows: Conclusion Ciprofloxacin MIC results for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp., and P. aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels using updated FDA/CLSI interpretive criteria in this multicenter study. * PROMPT® is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA. BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the US and other countries. Disclosures Maria M. Traczewski, BS MT (ASCP), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Denise Beasley, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sharon DesJarlais, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Omai Garner, PhD, D(ABMM), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Christine Hastey, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Regina Brookman, BS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Zabrina Lockett, MS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Jennifer Chau, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee)

Download Full-text