44. Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long Acting Lipoglycopeptides Used in Transitions of Care for Deep-Seated Infections

Abstract Background Dalbavancin and oritavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LaLGPs) FDA-approved for one-time only dosing for skin and skin structure infections. The use of these agents in serious, deep-seated infections requiring protracted antibiotic courses is of increasing interest. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical utility of LaLGPs in patients requiring protracted antibiotic courses who are not ideal candidates for oral transition or outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). Methods This is a retrospective, observational, matched cohort study of adult patients who received a LaLGP. Patients who received a LaLGP were matched 1:1 to those who received standard of care (SOC) therapy by age (+/- 10 years), infection type, microorganism, and socioeconomic factor (e.g. persons who inject drugs, homelessness). Cost effectiveness was evaluated as total healthcare-related costs between groups. Clinical failure was a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrence, or need for extended antibiotics beyond planned course within 90 days of initial infection. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and proportion of patients who left against medical advice (AMA). Results A total of 46 patients were included (23 per group). The most frequent indication was endovascular infection and the most common organism methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The average length of stay was 22.9 days vs. 31.9 days in the LaLGP and SOC cohorts, respectively (p=0.153). The average total healthcare-related cost of care was USD &295,589 in the LaLGP cohort compared to &326,089 in the SOC cohort (p=0.282). LaLGPs were associated with a mean savings of &30,500 - &55,831 per patient (cumulative cost savings of &701,510). There was no difference in clinical failure between the two cohorts (22% vs. 30%; p=0.491). Nearly 26% of patients in the SOC cohort left AMA compared to 0% in the LaLGP cohort (p=0.022). Conclusion Receipt of LaLGPs may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with socioeconomic factors and deep-seated infections who are not candidates for oral transition or OPAT. Disclosures Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, BCPS-AQ ID, bioMerieux (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck & Co. (Advisor or Review Panel member)Therapeutic Research Center (Speaker’s Bureau)Vaxart (Shareholder) P. Brandon Bookstaver, Pharm D, ALK Abello, Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Biomerieux (Speaker’s Bureau)Kedrion Biopharma (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

638. Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of Long-Acting CAB and RPV as Maintenance Therapy for HIV-1 Infection: LATTE-2 Week 256 Results

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.832 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S379-S380

Author(s):

Graham Smith ◽

Keith Henry ◽

Daniel Podzamczer ◽

Mar Masiá ◽

Christopher Bettacchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Panel Member ◽

Virologic Response ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Material Support ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Long Acting ◽

Hiv 1 ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Long-acting (LA) injectable suspensions of cabotegravir (CAB) & rilpivirine (RPV) are in phase III development. LATTE-2 W160 results demonstrated high rates of virologic response & overall tolerability. This W256 analysis evaluated long-term efficacy, safety, & tolerability of every 8-week (Q8W) & 4-week (Q4W) intramuscular (IM) dosing. Methods LATTE-2 is a phase IIb, multicenter, parallel arm, open-label study in antiretroviral therapy–naive adults with HIV. After a 20-week Induction Period on oral CAB+abacavir/lamivudine, participants (pts) with plasma HIV-1 RNA< 50c/mL were randomized 2:2:1 to IM CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W, Q4W, or continue oral (PO) regimen in the Maintenance Period (MP). After W96, pts on IM regimens continued their current MP regimen. Pts randomized to PO in MP chose a Q8W or Q4W IM regimen in the Extension Period (EP). W256 analysis of MP & EP included virologic success with HIV-1 RNA< 50 c/mL (Food & Drug Administration Snapshot analysis), protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF), & safety (intention-to-treat–Maintenance Exposed population). Results At W256, 88% (101/115; Q8W) & 74% (85/115; Q4W) of randomized IM pts had HIV-1 RNA< 50 c/mL, as did 93% (41/44) of PO to IM pts. No pt developed PDVF after W48. In the randomized IM arm (MP & EP), excluding injection-site reactions (ISRs), nasopharyngitis (45%), diarrhea (28%), & headache (24%) were the most common adverse events (AEs), with 34% (39/115; Q8W) & 33% (38/115; Q4W) of pts reporting AEs ≥grade 3, of which 12% (14/115; Q8W) & 11% (13/115; Q4W) were drug related. 3% (3/115; Q8W) & 17% (20/115; Q4W) of pts had AEs leading to withdrawal. 22% (25/115; Q8W) & 23% (27/115; Q4W) reported serious AEs (3 were drug related). In the PO to IM arm (EP only), most common AEs excluding ISRs were nasopharyngitis (25%), influenza (23%), & back pain (18%). 23% (10/44) reported AEs ≥grade 3 & 5% (2/44) had AEs leading to withdrawal. Majority of ISRs were mild/moderate pain & discomfort. < 1% of ISRs were severe, with 5 pts discontinuing due to ISRs. Table 1 Table 2 Conclusion CAB+RPV LA injectable therapy, administered Q8W or Q4W, demonstrated high rates of virologic response & tolerability through 5 years. W256 results add to previous results & demonstrate long-term durability of CAB+RPV LA for people living with HIV. Disclosures Keith Henry, MD, Gilead (Research Grant or Support, Paid to institution)GSK/ViiV (Research Grant or Support, Paid to institution)Janssen (Research Grant or Support, Paid to institution)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Paid to institution) Daniel Podzamczer, MD, PhD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Janssen Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck Sharp & Dohme (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Mar Masiá, MD, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceutica (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses)Merck Sharp & Dohme (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses) Hans Jaeger, MD, Abbvie (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)MSD Sharp & Dohme (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Marie-Aude Khuong-Josses, MD, Viiv HC (Advisor or Review Panel member) Kenneth Sutton, MA, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Cynthia C. McCoig, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kati Vandermeulen, MSC, Janssen Pharmaceutica (Employee, Shareholder) Rodica Van Solingen-Ristea, MD, Janssen R&D (Employee) William Spreen, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Shareholder) David Margolis, MD, MPH, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Download Full-text

116. Antiviral Activity and Safety of Long-acting Cabotegravir (CAB LA) Plus Long-acting Rilpivirine (RPV LA), Administered Every 2 Months (Q2M), in Hiv-positive Subjects: Results from the POLAR Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.426 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S186-S187

Author(s):

Anthony Mills ◽

Gary J Richmond ◽

Cheryl Newman ◽

Olayemi Osiyemi ◽

Jerry Cade ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antiviral Activity ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Once Daily ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Long Acting ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Long-acting (LA) cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) injectable suspensions have demonstrated efficacy in phase III studies. POLAR assessed antiviral activity and safety of CAB LA+RPV LA, administered every 2 mos (Q2M), in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral therapy–experienced adults who completed LATTE and received once-daily oral CAB30mg+RPV25mg treatment. Methods POLAR is a phase IIb, multicenter, open-label, rollover study in 97 virologically suppressed, HIV-infected adults. LATTE participants who completed ≥312 weeks on study, with plasma HIV-1RNA< 50c/mL at screening, were eligible for POLAR and offered the option to switch to CAB LA+RPV LA Q2M or to the oral fixed dose combination of dolutegravir (DTG)/rilpivirine (RPV) once daily, for continued maintenance of HIV-1RNA suppression. 90 participants chose CAB LA+RPV LA and 7 participants chose oral DTG/RPV. The primary outcome measure was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1RNA≥50c/mL after 12 mos (M12) of therapy. Safety and laboratory measures were assessed throughout the study. Participants selecting LA treatment completed satisfaction and quality-of-life questionnaires at Day 1, M6, and M12. Results At M12, no participant had HIV-1RNA≥50c/mL or protocol defined virologic failure (confirmed plasma HIV-1RNA > 200c/mL). Excluding injection-site reactions (ISRs), nasopharyngitis (11%), upper respiratory tract infection (11%), diarrhea (10%), and pyrexia (10%) were the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) in the Q2M arm. 10% (9/90) of Q2M participants reported AEs ≥grade 3; 0 were drug related. 2% (2/90) of Q2M participants had AEs leading to withdrawal. 6% (5/90) of participants reported serious AEs (1 considered drug-related). Over 12 mo, 1534 injections were administered; 463 ISRs were reported (30%; all grade 1/2 [84%/16%]); resolution of ISRs occurred after a median of 3 days. Minimal changes in lab parameters were observed in participants across 12 mo. 88% of participants who received LA therapy preferred CAB LA+RPV LA vs oral therapy. Table 1 Table 2 Conclusion CAB LA+RPV LA, administered Q2M, resulted in durable virologic suppression, an acceptable tolerability profile, and high levels of participant satisfaction over the first 12 mo of treatment in POLAR. Disclosures Anthony Mills, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Janssen Pharmaceutica (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Gary J. Richmond, MD, FACP, FCCP, Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)TaiMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Viv (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Cheryl Newman, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Olayemi Osiyemi, M.D, GlaxoSmithKline (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Jerry Cade, MD, Gilead (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Pharmaceutica (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Cynthia Brinson, MD, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Nisha Andany, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Gilead Sciences (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GlaxoSmithKline (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Scientific Research Study Investigator) David Margolis, MD, MPH, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kenneth Sutton, MA, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Viviana Wilches, HBSc, MBiotech, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Jeremy Roberts, MSc, GSK (Employee) Cynthia C. McCoig, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kati Vandermeulen, MSC, Janssen Pharmaceutica (Employee, Shareholder) William Spreen, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

Clinical Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides Used in Deep-Seated Infections among Patients with Social and Economic Barriers to Care

Pharmacy ◽

10.3390/pharmacy10010001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Kayla Antosz ◽

Majdi N. Al-Hasan ◽

Z. Kevin Lu ◽

Benjamin Tabor ◽

Julie Ann Justo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Clinical Utility ◽

Composite Endpoint ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Cost Of Care ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Clinical Failure ◽

Economic Barriers ◽

Long Acting

The use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LaLGPs) in serious, deep-seated infections is of increasing interest. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical utility of LaLGPs in patients requiring protracted antibiotic courses who are not ideal candidates for oral transition or outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). This is a retrospective, observational, matched cohort study of adult patients who received a LaLGP. Patients were matched 1:1 to those who received standard of care (SOC). Cost effectiveness was evaluated as total healthcare-related costs between groups. Clinical failure was a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrence, or need for extended antibiotics beyond planned course within 90 days of initial infection. There was no difference in clinical failure between the two cohorts (22% vs. 30%; p = 0.491). Six patients in the SOC cohort left against medical advice (AMA) prior to completing therapy. Among those who did not leave AMA, receipt of LaLGPs resulted in a decreased hospital length of stay by an average of 13.6 days. The average total healthcare-related cost of care was USD 295,589 in the LaLGP cohort compared to USD 326,089 in the SOC cohort (p = 0.282). Receipt of LaLGPs may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with deep-seated infections and socioeconomic factors who are not candidates for oral transition or OPAT.

Download Full-text

932. Clinical Characteristics of Persistent and Relapsing Babesiosis at an Academic Medical Center in New York City, 2015-2020

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1127 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S558-S559

Author(s):

Wesley Rogers ◽

Laura Kirkman ◽

Matthew Simon ◽

Lars Westblade

Keyword(s):

New York ◽

New York City ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Organ Dysfunction ◽

York City ◽

Medical Center ◽

Panel Member ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel

Abstract Background Current guidelines recommend at least 6 weeks of therapy for immunocompromised babesiosis patients; however, limited data exists to guide management in this population. We describe our institutional experience with immunocompromised babesiosis patients. Methods We reviewed all adult patients reported to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with a diagnosis of babesiosis at New York-Presbyterian (NYP)/Weill Cornell Medical Center and NYP/Lower Manhattan Hospital between 2015 and 2020. We compared characteristics and outcomes between patients receiving prolonged treatment (≥ 6 weeks; “cases”) and standard treatment (7-10 days; “controls”). Variables were compared using Fishers exact test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Results Among 35 patients diagnosed with babesiosis, 10 (29%) received at least 6 weeks of therapy. 5/10 (50%) received extended treatment due to persistent and/or relapsing parasitemia, evidence of hemolysis and/or clinical symptoms at 6 weeks from diagnosis (Table 1). The median age was 67 years and immunocompromising conditions included: anti-CD 20 therapy (40%), history of stem cell transplant (20%), anti-TNF alpha (10%), beta-thalassemia (10%), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (10%). Among case patients, the median treatment duration was 53 days (IQR 42-153) and 100% of patients received azithromycin/atovaquone based regimens with adjunctive agents including doxycycline (60%), clindamycin (20%) and proguanil (20%). Compared to control patients, case patients had higher frequency of blood transfusions (50% vs 12%; p=0.03), however, there was no difference in median peak parasitemia (1.13% vs 0.6%), rates of hospital admission (80% vs 88%), length of stay (6 vs 4 days), organ dysfunction (10% vs 4%) and mortality (0% vs 0%) (Table 2). Conclusion We found a high frequency (29%) of babesiosis patients at our medical center received at least a 6-week treatment course due to immunocompromising conditions. Although immunocompromised patients received longer treatment courses and had more severe anemia, in contrast to prior studies, we found other complications such as hospitalization rates, length of stay, organ dysfunction and mortality were comparable between both patient groups. Disclosures Lars Westblade, PhD, Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (Grant/Research Support)BioFire Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Hardy Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Roche (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi Inc (Advisor or Review Panel member)Talis Biomedical (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

1012. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected virologically-suppressed older adults in a real-world setting

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1198 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S534-S535

Author(s):

Charlotte-Paige M Rolle ◽

Vu Nguyen ◽

Kiran Patel ◽

Dan Cruz ◽

Federico Hinestrosa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Drug Interactions ◽

Real World ◽

Research Study ◽

Panel Member ◽

Median Number ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Hiv 1

Abstract Background Approximately 50% of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are ≥50 years old. Efforts are ongoing to identify antiretrovirals associated with fewer drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and long-term side effects in this group. Clinical trials of B/F/TAF demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in older adults, however, data from real-word settings are needed to validate these results. Methods This retrospective analysis evaluated records from PLWH aged ≥ 50 years at the Orlando Immunology Center who were switched to B/F/TAF between 2/7/2018 and 5/31/2019. Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks post-switch. The primary endpoint was maintenance of HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL at week 48. The impact of switching to B/F/TAF on DDIs, adverse events (AEs) and safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study. Results 306 patients met inclusion criteria. 62 (20%) were female, 126 (41%) were non-white, median age was 58 years (range [r] 50-81), median duration of HIV infection was 19.5 years (r 2-40), median number of chronic co-morbid conditions was 5 (r 0-20), and median number of baseline concomitant medications was 4 (r 0-23). 159 (52%) patients were switched from regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat. The most commonly documented reason for switch was simplification (Table 1). At Week 48, 287 (94%) patients maintained an HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/ml and 19 (6%) had an HIV-1 RNA between 50-200 copies/mL (Figure 1). 1 patient discontinued due to lack of efficacy. A total of 123 potential DDIs were identified in 104 (34%) patients taking a boosting agent or rilpivirine at baseline (Table 2). At Week 48, there was a significant median decline in total cholesterol (15.5 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.5; 21.5), LDL cholesterol (9.5 mg/dL, 95% CI: 4; 15.5) and triglycerides (20 mg/dL, 95% CI: 9.5; 32.5), and median weight increased by 2.5 pounds (95% CI: 1.5; 3.5). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 33 (11%) patients (all Grade 1-2) and led to 7 (2%) discontinuations. Table 1-Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics Table 2-Avoidance of Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) following switch to B/F/TAF Figure 1-Subgroup analysis of virologic outcomes at Week 48 Conclusion In this real-world cohort, switching to B/F/TAF was associated with maintenance of virologic control, improvement in lipid parameters, and avoidance of DDIs in a large proportion of patients. These data support use of B/F/TAF as a treatment option in older PLWH. Disclosures Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Kiran Patel, PharmD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Federico Hinestrosa, MD, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Theratechnologies (Speaker’s Bureau) Edwin DeJesus, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

1104. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Refractory and/or Resistant Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1290 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S582-S583

Author(s):

Eleni Karantoni ◽

Yiqi Su ◽

Anat Stern ◽

Phaedon D Zavras ◽

Sergio Giralt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Overall Survival ◽

T Cell ◽

Panel Member ◽

Multivariable Model ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Material Support ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background The epidemiology of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in the era of preemptive therapy (PET) is defined. In contrast, less data exists on refractory and/or resistant (R/R) CMV. We report on 1) the incidence; 2) risk factors and outcomes of R/R CMV by 1-year post HCT. Methods Retrospective review of 167 CMV seropositive (R+) recipients of first marrow or peripheral blood HCT from 1/2014 - 12/2017 managed by PET. Refractory CMV was defined as failure to achieve >1 log10 decrease in CMV viral load (VL) and having VL >1,000 IU/mL after ≥14 day of PET. Resistant CMV required genotypic confirmation of resistance mutation(s) in UL54 and/or UL97 genes. End organ disease (EOD) was defined by standard criteria. Patients (pts) were followed through 1-year post HCT and were categorized in two mutually exclusive groups as R/R and no R/R. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records and hospital databases. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to identify risk factors for R/R CMV. Results Of 167 PET recipients, 91 (54.5%) received ex vivo T cell depleted (TCD) HCT; 40 (24.0%) had mismatched donor; and 26 (15.6%) had multiple myeloma. 66/167 (39.5%) pts developed refractory CMV (6 pts also had resistant CMV). Time from HCT to CMV viremia was shorter in R/R group: median (IQR) 21.5 (17.2-27.8) days compared to no R/R group: 26 (19-32) days (p=0.031). Maximum VL was higher for R/R compared to no R/R: median (IQR) 9,118 (2,849-18,456) and 868 (474-1,908), respectively (p< 0.001). In multivariable model, risk factors for R/R included TCD HCT (p< 0.0001) and higher VL at PET initiation (p=0.0002). In contrast, CMV seropositive donor (p=0.035) was protective (Figure 1). CMV EOD developed in 28.2% of R/R and 16.2% of no R/R groups (p=0.085) (Figure 2). Overall survival at 1 year was 59.1% for R/R compared to 83.1% for no R/R group (p=0.00027) (Figure 3). Figure 1. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from multivariable model evaluating risk factors of refractory/resistant (R/R) CMV. Figure 2. Cumulative incidence curves of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) at 1-year post HCT Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of overall survival (OS) at 1-year post HCT Conclusion 1) Refractory and/or resistant CMV occurred in 39,5% of PET recipients. 2) T-cell depletion and higher CMV VL at PET initiation were risk factors for R/R CMV in multivariable models. 3) R/R CMV was associated with more EOD and worse overall survival. Disclosures Sergio Giralt, MD, Amgen (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Served an advisory board for Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, JAZZ pharmaceutical, Takeda, Novartis, KITE, and Spectrum pharma and has received research support from Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Miltenyi, Takeda.) Miguel-Angel Perales, MD, Abbvie (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria from Abbvie, Bellicum, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Nektar Therapeutics, Omeros, and Takeda.)ASTCT (Other Financial or Material Support, Volunteer member of the Board of Directors of American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), Be The Match (National Marrow Donor Program, NMDP), and the CIBMTR Cellular Immunotherapy Data Resource (CIDR) Committee)Cidara Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Serve on DSMBs for Cidara Therapeutics, Servier and Medigene, and the scientific advisory boards of MolMed and NexImmune.)Kite/Gilead (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Received research support for clinical trials from Incyte, Kite/Gilead and Miltenyi Biotec.) Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, Chimerix (Research Grant or Support)Merck&Co (Research Grant or Support, Investigator and received funding and consulting fees from Merck, Chimerix, Shire and Astellas)

Download Full-text

652. Comparison of fosfomycin (FOF) activity and prevalence of subpopulations between Escherichia coli (EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) during susceptibility testing

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.846 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S384-S384

Author(s):

Jadyn C Anderson ◽

Amanda R Krueger ◽

Elizabeth C Smith ◽

Morgan L Bixby ◽

Hunter V Brigman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Inhibitory Concentration ◽

Panel Member ◽

Colony Growth ◽

The United States ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Agreement Rate ◽

Future Studies ◽

Agar Dilution

Abstract Background In the United States, interpretive criteria for FOF are established only for EC, yet those criteria are often extrapolated to KP. Recent studies have highlighted both inferior clinical outcomes after FOF treatment and difficulties in interpretation of inner colony subpopulations, the presence of which may affect clinical efficacy. We sought to compare FOF activity against EC and KP and to determine the prevalence of inner colony subpopulations following disk diffusion (DD) testing of the two species. Methods A convenience collection of 73 KP and 42 EC isolates from 3 U.S. institutions were included. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was performed in duplicate on separate days using agar dilution (AD) and DD as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, with application of EC susceptibility (≤ 64mg/L) breakpoints. The frequency and counts of inner colonies observed during DD testing was calculated, and colonies were subcultured for use in future studies. Results MIC50/90 values were 1/16 mg/L and 32/256 mg/L for EC and KP respectively. All EC isolates were considered susceptible and therefore categorical agreement was 100%. The majority of KP isolates were considered susceptible (83.6% with AD and 86.3% with DD) and categorical agreement between the methods was 84.9%. Inner colonies were observed during DD testing in 88.1% of EC isolates and 80.8% of KP isolates during at least one replicate, with 47.6% of EC isolates and 39.7% of KP isolates showing inner colony growth during both DD test replicates. More than 10 inner colonies were observed in 50% of EC isolates compared to 12.3% of KP isolates. Conclusion KP isolates demonstrated considerably higher FOF MIC values compared to EC, as evidenced by MIC50/90 values 4-5 dilutions higher than those for EC. The categorical agreement rate was higher among EC than KP, highlighting concerns regarding the practice of extrapolating FOF susceptibility breakpoints for EC to KP. The high frequency of inner colonies observed in DD for both species necessitates further studies to determine best practices for interpreting their relevance, fitness, and resistance in order to identify potential impacts to clinical efficacy of FOF. Disclosures Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, Merck (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

108. Selective Decay of Intact HIV-1 Proviral DNA on Antiretroviral Therapy

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.418 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S183-S183

Author(s):

Rajesh Gandhi ◽

Joshua Cyktor ◽

Ronald Bosch ◽

Hanna Mar ◽

Gregory Laird ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antiretroviral Therapy ◽

Panel Member ◽

Plasma Viremia ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Proviral Dna ◽

Hiv 1 ◽

Over Time ◽

Residual Plasma Viremia ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background HIV-1 proviruses persist in people on antiretroviral therapy (ART) but most are defective and do not constitute a replication-competent reservoir. The decay of infected cells carrying intact compared with defective HIV-1 proviruses has not been well-defined in people on ART. Methods We separately quantified intact and defective proviruses (using an intact proviral DNA assay), residual plasma viremia, and markers of inflammation and activation in people on long-term ART. Longitudinal measurements were done at three timepoints: timepoint 1 was a median of 7.1 years on ART; timepoint 2 was a median of 3.7 years later; timepoint 3 was a median of 5.5 years after timepoint 1 and a median 12 years after starting ART (Figure 1). Figure 1: Study timepoints Results Among 40 participants tested longitudinally from a median of 7.1 years to 12 years after ART initiation, intact provirus levels declined significantly over time (median half-life 7.1 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9, 18), whereas defective provirus levels did not decrease. The median half-life of total HIV-1 DNA was 41.6 years (95% CI, 13.6, 75). When we evaluated the change in proviral DNA per year, intact proviral DNA declined significantly more (p< 0.001) than defective proviral DNA (the latter did not change) (Figure 2). The proportion of all proviruses that were intact diminished over time on ART, from about 10% at the first on-ART timepoint to about 5% at the last timepoint (Figure 3). At timepoint 1, intact provirus levels on ART correlated with total HIV-1 DNA and residual plasma viremia, but there was no evidence for associations between intact provirus levels and inflammation or immune activation. Figure 2: Percent change in HIV-1 proviral DNA per year Figure 3: Total HIV-1 proviruses (grey bars) and the percentage of intact proviruses (red lines, displaying median, Q1, Q3) by timepoint. Conclusion Cells containing intact, replication-competent proviruses are selectively lost during suppressive ART. Defining the mechanisms involved should inform strategies to accelerate HIV-1 reservoir depletion. Disclosures Rajesh Gandhi, MD, Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member) Gregory Laird, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Albine Martin, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Bernard Macatangay, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support) Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Janet Siliciano, PhD, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member)US Military HIV Research Program (Advisor or Review Panel member) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio (Shareholder)Accelevir Diagnostics (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)

Download Full-text

1465. Age-Dependent Interactions Among Clinical Characteristics, Viral Loads and Disease Severity in Young Children with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection (RSV) Infection

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1646 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S734-S735

Author(s):

Helena Brenes-Chacon ◽

Cristina Garcia-Maurino ◽

Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel ◽

Sara Mertz ◽

Fang Ye ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young Children ◽

Disease Severity ◽

Age Groups ◽

Panel Member ◽

Signs And Symptoms ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Viral Loads ◽

Age Dependent ◽

Rsv Infection

Abstract Background Differences in clinical presentation and viral loads according to age in young children with RSV, and their correlation with disease severity are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to define age-dependent the differences in demographic, clinical factors and viral loads between children < 2 years of age with mild RSV infection evaluated as outpatients versus those hospitalized with severe RSV infection. Figure 1. Sign and Symptoms according to disease severity and age in infants with RSV infection. Most relevant signs and symptoms were stratified in outpatients (orange) vs inpatients (blue) by age in (A) < 3 months, (B) between 3 and 6 months, and (C) > 6 to 24 months of age. The Y axis represents the signs and symptoms in the two disease severity groups and the X axis the frequency of that specific symptom (%). Numbers next to bars represent the exact number of patients with that specific sign/symptom. Comparisons by Fisher exact test. Symbol (*) indicate significant 2-sided p values Figure 2. Viral load differences according to age in infants with RSV infection. The Y axis represents RSV loads in log10 copies/mL and the X axis differences in viral loads in outpatients (orange) and inpatients (blue) in the three age groups. Comparisons by Mann Whitney test. Methods Previously healthy children < 2 years old with mild (outpatients) and severe (inpatients) RSV infection were enrolled and nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained for RSV typing and quantitation by real-time PCR. Patients were stratified by age (0-< 3, 3-6, and >6-24 months) and multivariable analyses were performed to identify clinical and viral factors associated with severe disease. Results From 2014-2018 we enrolled 534 children with RSV infection: 130 outpatients and 404 inpatients. Median duration of illness was 4 days for both groups, yet viral loads were higher in outpatients than inpatient in the three age groups (Fig 1). Wheezing was more frequent in outpatients of older age (>3 months) than in inpatients (p< 0.01), while fever was more common in inpatients that outpatients (p< 0.01) and increased with age (Fig 2). Adjusted analyses confirmed that increased work of breathing and fever were consistently associated with hospitalization irrespective of age, while wheezing in infants >3 months, and higher RSV loads in children >6-24 months were independently associated with reduced disease severity. Conclusion Age had a significant impact defining the interactions among viral loads, specific clinical manifestations and disease severity in children with RSV infection. These observations highlight the importance of patient stratification when evaluating interventions against RSV. Disclosures Octavio Ramilo, MD, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Medimmune (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)NIH/NIAID (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Sanofi/Medimmune (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member) Asuncion Mejias, MD, PhD, MsCS, Janssen (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

120. An open-label comparative trial of SUBA-itraconazole (SUBA) versus conventional itraconazole (c-itra) for treatment of proven and probable endemic mycoses (MSG-15): a pharmacokinetic (PK) and adverse Event (AE) analysis

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.120 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S72-S72

Author(s):

Peter G Pappas ◽

Andrej Spec ◽

Marisa Miceli ◽

Gerald McGwin ◽

Rachel McMullen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Serum Levels ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Endemic Mycoses ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background C-itra is the drug of choice for treatment of most non-CNS, non-life-threatening forms of endemic mycoses (EM), including histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis and talaromycosis. SUBA represents a new formulation of itraconazole that utilizes nanotechnology to improve bioavailability when administered orally. SUBA is formulated as nanoparticles allowing for absorption in the small bowel while not relying on gastric acidity for optimal absorption. MSG-15 is an open-label, comparative clinical trial comparing SUBA to c-itra for the treatment of EM. Herein we report the final PK and AE profiles of these two compounds. Methods Subjects with proven and probable EM were eligible this open-label comparative study. The protocol allowed up to 14 d of prior therapy with any antifungal for this episode of EM. Subjects were randomized to receive either SUBA 130 mg po bid or c-itra 200 mg po bid for up to 6 months. Follow up occurred at 7, 14, 28, 42, 84 and 180 d post-enrollment. PK samples were obtained at 7, 14, and 42 d. Clinical assessment, including symptom assessment, AEs, overall drug tolerance, and quality of life were assessed at each visit. We used descriptive statistics for this analysis. Results 89 subjects with EM entered the trial, including 43 on SUBA and 46 on c-itra. We measured PK serum levels of itra and hydroxyl-itra at days 7, 14, and 42 and these data are depicted in Figures 1-3. There were no significant differences in these levels, including combined itra/hydroxyl-itra levels, among the two study arms. AUC for itra and hydroxyl-itra were similar for both arms. AEs as assessed at each study evaluation were also quite similar among the two study arms. Overall, any AE occurred in 74% vs 85% of SUBA and c-itra recipients, respectively (NS). Drug-related AEs occurred in 35% vs 41% of SUBA and itra recipients, respectively (NS). Most common drug-related AEs included cardiovascular (edema and hypertension), nausea and loss of appetite. Combined Itraconazole and Hydroxy-itraconazole Concentration Over Time Conclusion Compared to c-itra, SUBA demonstrates almost identical serum levels despite being dosed at roughly 60% standard dosing for c-itra (130 mg po bid vs 200 mg po bid). SUBA is slightly better tolerated than c-itra, although the specific AEs are similar. Disclosures Peter G. Pappas, MD, Astellas (Research Grant or Support)Cidara (Research Grant or Support)F2G (Consultant)Matinas (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Mayne Pharma (Research Grant or Support)Scynexis (Research Grant or Support) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Marisa Miceli, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) George R. R. Thompson III, III, MD, Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Appili (Consultant)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Avir (Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Mayne (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text