scholarly journals 621. Identifying Quality-Improvement Interventions to Improve Inpatient Intravenous Vancomycin Safety at an Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S413-S413
Author(s):  
Sean Christensen ◽  
Russell J Benefield

Abstract Background The reported incidence of intravenous (IV) vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is highly variable. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the baseline rate of IV vancomycin-associated AKI at the University of Utah Hospital (UUH) and Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) with the goal of identifying areas of focus for future quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Methods This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients ≥ 18 years old, hospitalized at UUH or HCI, who received at least daily scheduled doses of IV vancomycin for ≥ 72 hours between November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2019. AKI was defined using the serum creatinine (SCr) aspect of the AKIN criteria. Variables assessed for association with AKI included demographic characteristics, hospital and unit where vancomycin was initiated, duration of therapy, administration method, and concomitant nephrotoxic medications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with AKI as potential QI interventions. Results One thousand eighty-six patients were included. Baseline patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. Throughout our system, 19.7% of patients experienced an AKI while receiving vancomycin. Univariate comparisons are listed in Table 1. Variables independently associated with AKI on multivariable analysis included total body weight (HR 1.02, 95% CI [1.01-1.03]), concomitant administration of calcineurin inhibitors or vasopressors (HR 1.97, 95% CI [1.18-3.29] and HR 1.68, 85% CI [1.07-2.64] respectively), duration of vancomycin therapy (HR, 1.04, 95% CI [1.02-1.06]), and administration in specific units (see Table 1). Administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion showed a protective effect (HR 0.13, 95% CI [0.02-1.12]) as did baseline SCr and total daily dose of vancomycin (HR 0.76, 95% CI [0.61-0.94] and HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.51-0.78] respectively); the latter two are likely a reflection of the study design. The median hospital length of stay in days was longer in individuals experiencing an AKI (19 vs 10, p < 0.0001). Table 1. Univariate and Multivariate Associations with Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury aFor continuous variables, the HR reported is for each unit increase Table 1. (Continued) Univariate and Multivariate Associations with Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury aFor continuous variables, the HR reported is for each unit increase Conclusion Several variables associated with vancomycin-associated AKI within our health system were identified. Future QI interventions to improve vancomycin safety will be pursued. Disclosures Russell J. Benefield, PharmD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S667-S668
Author(s):  
Ann-Marie Idusuyi ◽  
Maureen Campion ◽  
Kathleen Belusko

Abstract Background The new ASHP/IDSA consensus guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring to optimize vancomycin therapy. Little is known about the ability to implement this recommendation in a real-world setting. At UMass Memorial Medical Center (UMMMC), an AUC pharmacy to dose protocol was created to manage infectious diseases (ID) consult patients on vancomycin. The service was piloted by the pharmacy residents and 2 clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this study was to determine if a pharmacy to dose AUC protocol can safely and effectively be implemented. Methods A first-order kinetics calculator was built into the electronic medical record and live education was provided to pharmacists. Pharmacists ordered levels, wrote progress notes, and communicated to teams regarding dose adjustments. Patients were included based upon ID consult and need for vancomycin. After a 3-month implementation period, a retrospective chart review was completed. Patients in the pre-implementation group were admitted 3 months prior to AUC pharmacy to dose, had an ID consult and were monitored by trough (TR) levels. The AUC group was monitored with a steady state peak and trough level to calculate AUC. The primary outcome evaluated time to goal AUC vs. time to goal TR. Secondary outcomes included number of dose adjustments made, total daily dose of vancomycin, and incidence of nephrotoxicity. Results A total of 64 patients met inclusion criteria, with 37 patients monitored by TR and 27 patients monitored by AUC. Baseline characteristics were similar except for weight in kilograms (TR 80.0 ±25.4 vs AUC 92.0 ±26.7; p=0.049). The average time to goal AUC was 4.13 (±2.08) days, and the average time to goal TR was 4.19 (±2.30) days (p=0.982). More dose adjustments occurred in the TR group compared to the AUC (1 vs 2; p=0.037). There was no difference between the two groups in dosing (TR 15.8 mg/kg vs AUC 16.4 mg/kg; p=0.788). Acute kidney injury occurred in 5 patients in the AUC group and 11 patients in the TR group (p=0.765). Conclusion Fewer dose adjustments and less nephrotoxicity was seen utilizing an AUC based protocol. Our small pilot has shown that AUC pharmacy to dose can be safely implemented. Larger studies are needed to evaluate reduction in time to therapeutic goals. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Cotner ◽  
W. Cliff Rutter ◽  
Donna R. Burgess ◽  
Katie L. Wallace ◽  
Craig A. Martin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Limited literature is available assessing nephrotoxicity with prolonged β-lactam infusions. This study compared the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with a prolonged β-lactam infusion or an intermittent infusion. This was a retrospective, matched-cohort study at an academic medical center from July 2006 to September 2015. Adult patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) for at least 48 h were evaluated. Patients were excluded for preexisting renal dysfunction or pregnancy. The primary outcome was difference in incidence of AKI evaluated using the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage) criteria. Patients in the intermittent group were matched 3:1 to patients in the prolonged-infusion group based on the following: β-lactam agent, age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, baseline creatinine clearance, hypotension, receipt of vancomycin, and treatment in an intensive care unit. A total of 2,390 patients were included in the matched analysis, with 1,700 receiving intermittent infusions and 690 receiving prolonged infusion. The incidence of AKI was similar in the prolonged-infusion group to that in the intermittent-infusion group (21.6% versus 18.6%; P = 0.1). After multivariate regression, prolonged infusion was not associated with increased odds of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.83 to 1.39). Independent predictors of AKI included TZP therapy, concomitant nephrotoxins, hypotension, and heart failure. Although AKIs were numerically more common in patients receiving prolonged β-lactam infusions than those receiving intermittent infusions, prolonged infusion was not an independent risk factor for AKI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne M. Ritchie ◽  
Beth A. Hirning ◽  
Craig A. Stevens ◽  
Steven A. Cohen ◽  
Jeremy R. DeGrado

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Katja M. Gist ◽  
Santiago Borasino ◽  
Megan SooHoo ◽  
Danielle E. Soranno ◽  
Emily Mack ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute kidney injury is a common complication following the Norwood operation. Most neonatal studies report acute kidney injury peaking within the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate if persistent acute kidney injury (>48 postoperative hours) after the Norwood operation was associated with clinically relevant outcomes. Methods: Two-centre retrospective study among neonates undergoing the Norwood operation. Acute kidney injury was initially identified as developing within the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery and stratified into transient (≤48 hours) and persistent (>48 hours) using the neonatal modification of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria. Severe was defined as stage ≥2. Primary and secondary outcomes were mortality and duration of ventilation and hospital length of stay. Results: One hundred sixty-eight patients were included. Transient and persistent acute kidney injuries occurred in 24 and 17%, respectively. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp duration, and incidence of cardiac arrest were greater among those with persistent kidney injury. Mortality was four times higher (41 versus 12%, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation duration 50 hours longer in persistent acute kidney injury patients (158 versus 107 hours; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, persistent acute kidney injury was not associated with mortality, duration of ventilation or length of stay. Severe persistent acute kidney injury was associated with a 59% increase in expected ventilation duration (aIRR:1.59, 95% CI:1.16, 2.18; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Future large studies are needed to determine if risk factors and outcomes change by delineating acute kidney injury into discrete timing phenotypes.


Author(s):  
Devin Loewenstein ◽  
Brandon Scott ◽  
Nasim Afsarmanesh ◽  
Anna Dermenchyan ◽  
Gregg Fonarow

Background: Hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and heart transplant is associated with a high likelihood of readmission within 30 days of discharge. Our study objective was to identify risk factors and causes for readmission at a high acuity tertiary academic medical center in order to develop targeted interventions aimed at HF readmission reduction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 49 sequential cases of patients readmitted within 30 days of hospitalization for HF (41) or heart transplant (8) between Q3-Q4 2014. Two unblinded reviewers determined the root causes of readmission, likelihood of readmission prevention, and interventions most likely to prevent similar readmissions from recurring. Results: HF exacerbation was the primary reason for readmission in 47% (23/49) of cases. Also in 47% (23/49) of the readmissions, the possibility for preventing the readmission had an appropriate intervention been implemented was determined to be at least 50%. The other 53% (26/49) of readmissions were considered unlikely to have been readily preventable. Medical complications were the primary cause of readmission in 14% (7/49) of cases, of which acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common. Over one-fourth (13/49) of all readmissions were found to have at least a 15% increase in creatinine level from time of discharge to time of readmission. Dietary indiscretion (8% i.e. 4/49), psychosocial factors (8%), and progression of disease (8%) were other notable root causes for readmission. When assessing the most likely part of patient care to address to prevent readmission, more proactive follow-up/monitoring was considered to be the most high-yield intervention in 14% of cases i.e. 7/49. Also of note, reclassifying admissions as observation status based on length of stay would have prevented 33% (16/49) of cases from meeting readmission criteria. Conclusion: Our study supports a multifaceted, multidisciplinary approach to reducing HF readmissions, given the array of readmission causes and targeted areas for intervention identified. It also demonstrates that AKI may be an underappreciated cause for readmission, with 28% of all-cause readmissions presenting with creatinine elevations of at least 15%. Therefore, in addition to a multidisciplinary approach to discharge planning, we recommend institutions implement specific strategies to reduce AKI.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Lekha Tummalapalli ◽  
John Zech ◽  
Hyung J. Cho ◽  
Celine Goetz

Abstract Background: Renal ultrasounds (RUS) are commonly ordered in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Clinical decision support tools could be used to inform which patients may benefit from RUS to rule out hydronephrosis, however current risk stratification frameworks are underutilized.Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults with AKI at a large, tertiary, academic medical center who had a RUS ordered. We validated an existing risk stratification framework to predict hydronephrosis based on 7 criteria. Outcomes were presence of unilateral or bilateral hydronephrosis and incidental findings on RUS. Results: Two hundred and eighty-one patients were included in the study cohort; 111 (40%), 76 (27%), and 94 (33%) patients were in the high-, medium-, and low-risk groups for hydronephrosis, respectively, based on the risk stratification framework. Thirty-five patients (12%) were found to have hydronephrosis, of whom 86% were captured in the high-risk group. A nephrology consult was involved in 168 (60%) patients and RUS was recommended by the nephrology service in 95 (57%) cases. Of the 95 patients recommended for a RUS, 9 patients (9%) had hydronephrosis. Among the patients with a nephrology consultation, 9 (56%) of the 16 total patients with hydronephrosis were recommended to obtain a RUS. Conclusions: We further validated a risk stratification framework for hydronephrosis and found that nephrology recommendations predicted hydronephrosis less well than the risk stratification framework. Decision support tools for hydronephrosis may be useful to supplement clinical judgement in the evaluation of AKI.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Lekha Tummalapalli ◽  
John Zech ◽  
Hyung J. Cho ◽  
Celine Goetz

Abstract Abstract Background Renal ultrasounds (RUS) are commonly ordered in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), however clinical risk prediction could be used to inform which patients require imaging to rule out hydronephrosis. While risk stratification frameworks have been described, the role of nephrology consultation as an additional driver of RUS ordering has not been comprehensively studied. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults at a large, tertiary, academic medical center with AKI who had a RUS ordered. Predictors were high-risk, medium-risk, or low-risk category based on an existing risk stratification framework and RUS recommended by a consulting nephrology service. Outcomes were presence of unilateral or bilateral hydronephrosis and incidental findings on RUS. Results Two hundred and eighty-one patients were included in the study cohort; 111 (40%), 76 (27%), and 94 (33%) patients were in the high-, medium-, and low-risk groups for hydronephrosis, respectively, based on the risk stratification framework. Thirty-five patients (12%) were found to have hydronephrosis, of whom 86% were captured in the high-risk group. A nephrology consult was involved in 168 (60%) patients and RUS was recommended by the nephrology service in 95 (57%) cases. Of the 95 patients recommended for a RUS, 9 patients (9%) had hydronephrosis. Among the patients with a nephrology consultation, 9 (56%) of the 16 total patients with hydronephrosis were recommended to obtain a RUS. Conclusions We further validated a risk stratification framework for hydronephrosis and found that nephrology consultation was an additional driver of RUS ordering, but predicted hydronephrosis less well than the risk stratification framework. Our decision framework strengthens the argument for the use of risk stratification to improve upon consultant recommendations, reduce incidental findings, and decrease RUS overuse.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Peyko ◽  
Samantha Smalley ◽  
Henry Cohen

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the observed incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients receiving the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin versus the combination of cefepime or meropenem and vancomycin for greater than 72 hours. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label cohort study at a community academic medical center involving adult patients over a 3-month time period who received either the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin or the combination of cefepime or meropenem and vancomycin for greater than 72 hours. The patients were evaluated for AKI, defined using specific criteria introduced by Kidney Disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group in 2012. Results: A total of 85 patients receiving either antimicrobial combination were evaluated for AKI. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin group (37.3%) compared with the cefepime or meropenem and vancomycin group (7.7%; χ2 = 7.80, P = .005). Conclusion: The result of this study suggests that the risk of developing AKI is increased in patients receiving the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin versus those receiving the combination of cefepime or meropenem and vancomycin.


Author(s):  
John R. Lee ◽  
Jeffrey Silberzweig ◽  
Oleh Akchurin ◽  
Mary E. Choi ◽  
Vesh Srivatana ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982199175
Author(s):  
Pooja Nawathe ◽  
Robert Wong ◽  
Gabriel Pollock ◽  
Jack Green ◽  
Michael Kissen ◽  
...  

Background: Pandemics create challenges for medical centers, which call for innovative adaptations to care for patients during the unusually high census, to distribute stress and work hours among providers, to reduce the likelihood of transmission to health care workers, and to maximize resource utilization. Methods: We describe a multidisciplinary vascular access team’s development to improve frontline providers’ workflow by placing central venous and arterial catheters. Herein we describe the development, organization, and processes resulting in the rapid formation and deployment of this team, reporting on notable clinical issues encountered, which might serve as a basis for future quality improvement and investigation. We describe a retrospective, single-center descriptive study in a large, quaternary academic medical center in a major city. The COVID-19 vascular access team included physicians with specialized experience in placing invasive catheters and whose usual clinical schedule had been lessened through deferment of elective cases. The target population included patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 in the medical ICU (MICU) needing invasive catheter placement. The line team placed all invasive catheters on patients in the MICU with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Results and conclusions: Primary data collected were the number and type of catheters placed, time of team member exposure to potentially infected patients, and any complications over the first three weeks. Secondary outcomes pertained to workflow enhancement and quality improvement. 145 invasive catheters were placed on 67 patients. Of these 67 patients, 90% received arterial catheters, 64% central venous catheters, and 25% hemodialysis catheters. None of the central venous catheterizations or hemodialysis catheters were associated with early complications. Arterial line malfunction due to thrombosis was the most frequent complication. Division of labor through specialized expert procedural teams is feasible during a pandemic and offloads frontline providers while potentially conferring safety benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document