The wisdom of delay

Author(s):  
Peggy D. Bennett

In schools, the volume and frequency of questions and deci­sions can be smothering on some days. With fast- paced inqui­ries and lickety- split decisions, we may forget the value and necessity of pausing. • “I’ll get back to you about that.” • “Let me think about how I want to respond.” • “Tomorrow I’ll let you know what the consequences will be.” • “I’ll consider your request and let you know of my decision.” Replying immediately is not always a good idea. Whether react­ing to a proposal, an infraction, or a critical remark, delaying our reply can be wise. Of course, there are times when a delay may be inappropri­ate or ineffective. One way to choose is to take three seconds to decide whether a situation or a person is demanding an imme­diate response. Then make a judgment about how to offer the best response. • In response to a co- worker’s request to change a schedule or delay a project: “Let me consider what is involved with that change, and I’ll let you know shortly.” • A parent notifies you that her child will miss an upcoming, required event: “I’m startled to hear that. I want to consider the implications before I give you my response.” • An administrator expects you to discontinue your beloved annual school program: “This comes as a shock. I want to have a conversation about this, but not right now. I’ll make an appointment for tomorrow.” Brief postponement of a response can offer the strength of a deep breath, the perspective of further query, and the potential of a calm, reasoned rejoinder. Whether our delay is twenty- four minutes or twenty- four hours, we take time to craft our response. And we often feel the vivid sense of strength, centeredness, and power that results. For self- preservation, as well as fair- mindedness and even­handedness toward others, consider the wisdom of delay. Hesitation can have its benefits.

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Neber ◽  
Kurt A. Heller

Summary The German Pupils Academy (Deutsche Schüler-Akademie) is a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school students. Three types of program evaluation were conducted. Input evaluation confirmed the participants as intellectually highly gifted students who are intrinsically motivated and interested to attend the courses offered at the summer school. Process evaluation focused on the courses attended by the participants as the most important component of the program. Accordingly, the instructional approaches meet the needs of highly gifted students for self-regulated and discovery oriented learning. The product or impact evaluation was based on a multivariate social-cognitive framework. The findings indicate that the program contributes to promoting motivational and cognitive prerequisites for transforming giftedness into excellent performances. To some extent, the positive effects on students' self-efficacy and self-regulatory strategies are due to qualities of the learning environments established by the courses.


1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance N. Swander ◽  
Gladys R. Blankenship ◽  
Herbert Yahraes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document