“All Blacks Are Angry”

2021 ◽  
pp. 213-232
Author(s):  
Peter Irons

This chapter examines the continuing disparities between Whites and Blacks through extensive social science data and studies of the impacts of systemic racism. It first utilizes what demographers call the dissimilarity index to measure housing segregation in major metropolitan areas; cities with heavily Black populations, such as Detroit, have become “hyper-segregated” with almost total “social isolation” of Blacks. The chapter then examines the long-standing academic and political debates over the causes of systemic racism, beginning in 1965 with a government report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, by a young Labor Department aide, Daniel Patrick “Pat” Moynihan. He found the main cause of Black poverty and increasing single Black motherhood in the “pathology” of a “matriarchal” Black family structure in which males are neither needed nor welcome. Moynihan’s report spurred an angry rebuttal in a book by psychology professor William Ryan, Blaming the Victim, which found the main cause of Black poverty in the systemic racism of White society and culture. The chapter then looks at social science studies by William Julius Wilson (explaining the “racial invariance” of White and Black crime); psychologist John Dollard (explaining the prevalence of Black-on-Black crime with the “frustration-aggression-displacement” theory); and Black psychiatrists William Grier and Price Cobbs (explaining “Black rage” as rooted in White control of institutions that exclude or discriminate against Blacks). The chapter concludes with a look at the War on Drugs of the 1980s and 1990s and the resulting mass incarceration of Black men.

1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
PATRICIA E. STIVERS

Author(s):  
Redactie KITLV

- T.W. Kamil, E.M. Uhlenbeck, De Systematiek der Javaanse Pronomina. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, vol. XXX. ‘s-Gravenhage, Martinus Nijhoff, 1960. 63 p.- J. Noorduyn, Hans Kähler, Grammatik der Bahasa Indonésia, mit Chrestomathie und Wörterverzeichnis. Otto Harrassowitz. Wiesbaden 1956. VII + 307pp.- J.L. Swellengrebel, J.H. Hooykaas-v. Leeuwen Boomkamp, Ritual purification of a Balinese temple. Verhand. Kon. Nederl. Ak. v. Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterk., N.R. LXVIII, no. 4. 38 blz. tekst, 41 blz. afbeeldingen en register.- L. Kok, Bernhard H.M. Vlekke, Nusantara. A history of Indonesia. Wholly revised edition. W. van Hoeve Ltd, The Hague and Bandung, 1959; VIII, 479 p.- W. Ph. Coolhaas, B.H.M. Vlekke, Corrigenda op Nusantara, A history of Indonesia. Wholly revised edition. W. van Hoeve Ltd, The Hague and Bandung, 1959; VIII, 479 p.- S. Kooijman, C.A. Valentine, Masks and men in a Melanesian Society. The Valuku or Tubuan of the Lakalai of New Britain. University of Kansas Publications, Social Science Studies, 1961. Lawrence, Kansas, 76 pp., 2 kaarten, 18 foto’s en 3 kleurenproducties van tekeningen.- P. van Emst, A.P. Vayda, Maori warfare. Polynesian Society Maori Monographs No. 2. The Polynesian Society Inc. Wellington 1960. 141 pp.- ,


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Bloom ◽  
Laurie Paul

Some decision-making processes are uncomfortable. Many of us do not like to make significant decisions, such as whether to have a child, solely based on social science research. We do not like to choose randomly, even in cases where flipping a coin is plainly the wisest choice. We are often reluctant to defer to another person, even if we believe that the other person is wiser, and have similar reservations about appealing to powerful algorithms. And, while we are comfortable with considering and weighing different options, there is something strange about deciding solely on a purely algorithmic process, even one that takes place in our own heads.What is the source of our discomfort? We do not present a decisive theory here—and, indeed, the authors have clashing views over some of these issues—but we lay out the arguments for two (consistent) explanations. The first is that such impersonal decision-making processes are felt to be a threat to our autonomy. In all of the examples above, it is not you who is making the decision, it is someone or something else. This is to be contrasted with personal decision-making, where, to put it colloquially, you “own” your decision, though of course you may be informed by social science data, recommendations of others, and so on. A second possibility is that such impersonal decision-making processes are not seen as authentic, where authentic decision making is one in which you intentionally and knowledgably choose an option in a way that is “true to yourself.” Such decision making can be particularly important in contexts where one is making a life-changing decision of great import, such as the choice to emigrate, start a family, or embark on a major career change.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakhrunisa Fakhrunisa

The research about the use of substitute drills learning methods on simple present tense has been carried out which aims to know (1) the increasing activities in implementation classroom action, (2) the increasing student learning outcomes and (3) the student responses in the learning activity by using the substitutions drills strategy. The research conducted a classroom action research design (CAR) with two cycles. Each cycle consists of planning, implementing actions, observing and evaluating, and analyzing and reflecting. The research subjects were the 34 students of 10th grade of social science. Data were collected through observation techniques, learning achievement tests, and questionnaire distribution. Data were analyzed with quantitative descriptive analysis techniques and qualitative analysis. Based on the results of research, by using learning substitutions drills method on simple present tense material can increase the activities of implementing classroom actions and student learning outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
James Young

International Journal of Social Science Studies (IJSSS) would like to thank the following reviewers for reviewing manuscripts from September 16, 2013, to March 31, 2014. Their comments and suggestions were of great help to the authors in improving the quality of their papers. Many authors, regardless of whether IJSSS publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Redfame Publishing appreciates the following reviewers’ rigorous and conscientious efforts for this journal. Each of the reviewers listed below returned at least one review during this period. Remigiusz Janusz Kijak Anna Maria Mouza Patricia Wiener Paulito Valeriano Hilario Michael Brooks Parveen Kaur Shani Bardach Luigia Simona Sica Raymond Chan Federica Palumbo Linda Chernus Mónica Martínez Gómez Joy D. Patton Mariano D. Perelman Zitha Mokomane Jamie Spinney Lee Pugalis Yaghoob Foroutan Maja Gori Ofer Katchergin Nina V Gunnarsson Roberto Franzini Tibaldeo Xue Bai Kimberly Schutte Shahadat Hossain Mei-Se Chien Mohammed Nasarat Laura K Taylor Sudershan Pasupuleti Suman Kasturi Russell Kabir Noraida Endt Suman Kasturi Maria Merino Quinn Keefer Flavia Cangia' Russell Kabir Aprinalistria Aprinalistria Begoña Montero-Fleta


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahendran Roobavannan ◽  
Tim H. M. van Emmerik ◽  
Yasmina Elshafei ◽  
Jaya Kandasamy ◽  
Matthew Sanderson ◽  
...  

Abstract. Sustainable water resources management relies on understanding how societies and water systems co-evolve. Many place-based socio-hydrology (SH) studies use proxies, such as environmental degradation, to capture key elements of the social component of system dynamics. Parameters of assumed relationships between environmental degradation and the human response to it are usually obtained through calibration. Since these relationships are not yet underpinned by social science theories, confidence in the predictive power of such place-based socio-hydrologic models remains low. The generalisability of SH models therefore requires major advances in incorporating more realistic relationships, underpinned by appropriate hydrological and social science data, and theories. The latter is a critical input, since human culture – especially values and norms arising from it – influences behaviour and the consequences of behaviours. This paper reviews a key social science theory that links cultural factors to environmental decision-making, assesses how to better incorporate social science insights to enhance SH models, and raises important questions to be addressed in moving forward. This is done in the context of recent progress in socio-hydrological studies and the gaps that remain to be filled. The paper concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities in terms of generalisation of SH models and the use of available data to allow future prediction and model transfer to ungauged basins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document