Making Infrastructures Audible

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-55
Author(s):  
Kyle Devine ◽  
Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier

The editorial introduction to this book offers an intellectual and political proposition for studying the media infrastructures of music and sound. It provides a summary of existing infrastructural scholarship across media studies, anthropology, science and technology studies, and other fields. It also describes the work of infrastructural analysis in relation to music and sound studies. Key concepts and approaches include examining supporting casts and operating in a deflationary mode, as well as adopting a mediatic perspective on the infrastructures of music and sound in order to understand the broad technosocial conditions that give rise to these cultural forms in the first place. Certain aspects of musical culture are described in terms of cultural techniques. There is also a section on the histories of notation, paper, ink, and publishing as media infrastructures of music and sound. Ultimately, the introduction lays the groundwork for a book that is about humble things and ordinary people—deeply hidden, plainly obvious, and everywhere powerful infrastructures of music and sound. The goal is to make infrastructures audible. For it is at this level—the level of supply chains, circulatory systems, and waste streams—where scholars can confront some of the most pressing dilemmas regarding the conditions of music, and the human condition more generally.

2021 ◽  
pp. 146144482199547
Author(s):  
Soledad Altrudi ◽  
Christina Dunbar-Hester ◽  
Kate Miltner

The last couple of years have seen an uptick of different technological forms presented as mediators of human/nonhuman interaction, and these developments have been accompanied by an increase in scholarly interest. Here, we engage with the human urge to enter into communicative exchanges that implicate “other” entities, but we also wonder what is at stake, analytically and ethically, in these mediated communicative acts. Following an approach informed by work in the environmental humanities as well as science and technology studies and media studies, we explore three sites of (ostensible) encounters between humans and nonhuman others—plants and animals—and argue that while certain technological mediations can facilitate human “noticing” by rendering nonhuman others sense-able, it does not follow that such interventions open up a space where participants can meaningfully respond to each other.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Ananny

An examination of the principles and techniques that social media platforms use to define and regulate political speech. Uses concepts from Communication, Media Studies, and Science and Technology Studies to investigate how platforms define ideals of citizenship, the politics of the categories they use to define speech, and the role that algorithms and probability play in governing platform speech.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Burns ◽  
Fabien Medvecky

In this article, we suggest that three concepts from cultural and media studies might be useful for analysing the ways audiences are constructed in science communication: that media are immanent to society, media are multiple and various, and audiences are active. This article uses those concepts, along with insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS), to examine the category of ‘the disengaged’ within science communication. This article deals with the contrast between ‘common sense’ and scholarly ideas of media and audiences in the field of cultural and media studies. It compares the ‘common sense’ with scholarly ideas of science publics from STS. We conclude that it may be time to reconsider the ontology of publics and the disengaged for science communication.


Reckoning ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 24-50
Author(s):  
Candis Callison ◽  
Mary Lynn Young

Chapter 1 lays the conceptual groundwork for the book, bridging histories of journalism and science with particular attention to journalistic stance, objectivity, and representational critique. We start with why and how the tarnished ideal of objectivity—the view from nowhere—is still doing so much work, heavy lifting, and harm. We contend that journalism studies as a field has failed to address questions of power and decades of persistent criticism from media studies, critical race studies, science and technology studies, and feminist media studies. Instead, journalism scholarship has tended to focus on individual, ethical, and front-stage professional reputational concerns more than on journalism’s claims to speak truth to power—and its ability to talk about methods, expertise, and reliable knowledge claims. This focus has allowed journalists to deny their personal subjectivity and professional context as a white-dominated profession, which has left journalism open to yet more critique.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-40
Author(s):  
Marcin Zaród

This article adopts methodology from digital qualitative studies in order to discuss issues specific to e-sport research in the sociology of sport. The applied concepts are built on a critical discussion of the existing theories and cases from the author’s fieldwork on e-sports among hackers. The employed theories and methods are taken from virtual ethnography, netnography, and digital ethnography. These approaches are discussed critically, especially regarding their relations with Science and Technology Studies and Communication and Media Studies. The paper advocates acknowledging the cognitive approach from virtual ethnography, while dropping the approach to virtuality in favor of other theories of spatiality, with the theory of infrastructure as the backbone. It discusses the usability of Kozinets’ netnographical genres and their potential differences, but proposes a more practical solution to autonetnography. Finally, it shows how different frameworks in digital ethnography can be used in the context of e-sport research. The last part of the article is devoted to some practical advice based on discussions and practice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 205943642110125
Author(s):  
Kun Li

From the perspective of communication and media studies, this article explores a comparison between the image of older adults presented on media and online self-representation facilitated by the use of smartphones. The qualitative textual analysis was conducted with a sample (228 posts, from 1 January to 31 December,2019) selected from a representative WeChat Public Account targeting at older adults in China. The results demonstrate that leisure and recreation is the most frequently mentioned topic (58%) with memories of past life receiving the least references (3%). The striking features of popular posts among older people include a highly emotional tone, bright colours and multimedia. Sentiment analyses shows 68.42%, 13.16% and 18.42% of positive, neutral and negative emotions, respectively. A generally positive attitude of self-representation is in a sharp contrast with the stigmatic media image of older adults. The article concludes that the visibility of Chinese older people may help to reduce the stigma surrounding old age in China.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-116
Author(s):  
Basile Zimmermann

Abstract Chinese studies are going through a period of reforms. This article appraises what could constitute the theoretical and methodological foundations of contemporary sinology today. The author suggests an approach of “Chinese culture” by drawing from recent frameworks of Science and Technology Studies (STS). The paper starts with current debates in Asian studies, followed by a historical overview of the concept of culture in anthropology. Then, two short case studies are presented with regard to two different STS approaches: studies of expertise and experience and the notion of interactional expertise, and the framework of waves and forms. A general argument is thereby sketched which suggests how “Chinese culture” can be understood from the perspective of materiality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document