scholarly journals Making up Political People: How Social Media Create the Ideals, Definitions, and Probabilities of Political Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Ananny

An examination of the principles and techniques that social media platforms use to define and regulate political speech. Uses concepts from Communication, Media Studies, and Science and Technology Studies to investigate how platforms define ideals of citizenship, the politics of the categories they use to define speech, and the role that algorithms and probability play in governing platform speech.

2021 ◽  
pp. 146144482199547
Author(s):  
Soledad Altrudi ◽  
Christina Dunbar-Hester ◽  
Kate Miltner

The last couple of years have seen an uptick of different technological forms presented as mediators of human/nonhuman interaction, and these developments have been accompanied by an increase in scholarly interest. Here, we engage with the human urge to enter into communicative exchanges that implicate “other” entities, but we also wonder what is at stake, analytically and ethically, in these mediated communicative acts. Following an approach informed by work in the environmental humanities as well as science and technology studies and media studies, we explore three sites of (ostensible) encounters between humans and nonhuman others—plants and animals—and argue that while certain technological mediations can facilitate human “noticing” by rendering nonhuman others sense-able, it does not follow that such interventions open up a space where participants can meaningfully respond to each other.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Burns ◽  
Fabien Medvecky

In this article, we suggest that three concepts from cultural and media studies might be useful for analysing the ways audiences are constructed in science communication: that media are immanent to society, media are multiple and various, and audiences are active. This article uses those concepts, along with insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS), to examine the category of ‘the disengaged’ within science communication. This article deals with the contrast between ‘common sense’ and scholarly ideas of media and audiences in the field of cultural and media studies. It compares the ‘common sense’ with scholarly ideas of science publics from STS. We conclude that it may be time to reconsider the ontology of publics and the disengaged for science communication.


Arbeit ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Carstensen

ZusammenfassungMit der Digitalisierung verändert sich gegenwärtig auch der Arbeitsalltag der Beschäftigten. Allerdings erfolgt die Aneignung der neuen Technologien nicht immer reibungslos. Auf der Grundlage von theoretischen Ansätzen der Science and Technology Studies, der Information System Research, der Praxistheorie, der Cultural Studies und der Soziologie des Digitalen fragt der Beitrag nach dem Eigensinn und der Handlungsmacht von Beschäftigten. Am Beispiel einer empirischen Studie über die Social-Media-Nutzung in Unternehmen wird gezeigt, wie Arbeitsorganisation, spezifische Haltungen der Subjekte sowie bestimmte Charakteristika der eingesetzten Technik deren Nutzung sowie die Emergenz neuer Praktiken verhindern.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-116
Author(s):  
Basile Zimmermann

Abstract Chinese studies are going through a period of reforms. This article appraises what could constitute the theoretical and methodological foundations of contemporary sinology today. The author suggests an approach of “Chinese culture” by drawing from recent frameworks of Science and Technology Studies (STS). The paper starts with current debates in Asian studies, followed by a historical overview of the concept of culture in anthropology. Then, two short case studies are presented with regard to two different STS approaches: studies of expertise and experience and the notion of interactional expertise, and the framework of waves and forms. A general argument is thereby sketched which suggests how “Chinese culture” can be understood from the perspective of materiality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Charlotte Dionisius

Ein, zwei, drei oder vier Elternteile, »Sponkel«, »Mapas« und lesbische Zeugungsakte - wer oder was Familie ist und wie sie gegründet wird, hat sich vervielfältigt. Sarah Charlotte Dionisius rekonstruiert aus einer von den Feminist Science and Technology Studies inspirierten, queertheoretischen Perspektive, wie lesbische und queere Frauen*paare, die mittels Samenspende Eltern geworden sind, Familie, Verwandtschaft und Geschlecht imaginieren und praktizieren. Damit wirft sie einen heteronormativitätskritischen Blick auf die sozialwissenschaftliche Familienforschung sowie auf gesellschaftliche und rechtliche Entwicklungen, die neue Ein- und Ausschlüsse queerer familialer Lebensweisen mit sich bringen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document