Horizontal Realizations

2020 ◽  
pp. 93-198
Author(s):  
Assaf Shelleg

If the actualization of biblical sovereignty in the Zionist present rendered eighteen centuries of exile a nocturnal existence, art music of the 1950s and 1960s interfered with such linearity using the linear properties of non-Western Jewish musical traditions and serial compositional devices. Such a convergence rendered the objectification of non-Western Jewish musical traditions obsolete and consequently severed the exotic and territorial functions they served. By utilizing the linear properties of Arab Jewish musical traditions to animate inner semiotic occurrences, composers suspended extrovert exotic signifiers and invalidated their objectification. With no visible exoteric earmarks to transmit peripherality and Otherness, the binaries by which non-European Jewish immigrants had been perceived (primitivism/modernism, religion/secularism) were deemed progressively inoperative. Through a study on the agency of non-European Jewish musical traditions, chapter 2 uncovers the network that connects the theological grammar of Zionism with the Zionist pecking order, whose lower rungs were allocated to North African and Near Eastern Jews.

1978 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcadius Kahan

The purpose of the following essay is to evaluate the existing economic opportunities for Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe and to indicate the pace of their economic progress during the period 1890–1914. This purpose can best be achieved by viewing the mass migration of these European Jews in the proper perspective, that is, in terms of the dynamics of their situation at the places of original habitat; second, by differentiating successive cohorts of immigrants in terms of their skill composition, literacy, and degree of experienced urbanization, all elements important for the adaptability to and utilization of existing economic opportunities; third, by analyzing the structure of the U.S. industries that provided employment opportunities to the East European Jewish immigrants; fourth, by assuming the income level and standard of living of the native-born labor force as the yardstick for measuring the economic progress of the immigrants. Such an approach may broaden our understanding of the mechanism of adjustment that enabled the Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe both to take advantage of existing economic opportunities and to create new ones.


Author(s):  
Richard K. Wolf

This chapter argues that a family of common rhythmic conceptions underlies many of the musical traditions of South Asia despite sometimes dramatic regional differences in language, culture, and religion. Two contrasting kinds of rhythmic representation are examined: one that objectifies through names and numbers, and one that points toward freedom and resists numeration. Evidence for the first is drawn from the analysis of ritual drumming in India and Pakistan as well as concepts and structures in the art music traditions of North and South India. The second concerns both drumming and the elastic rhythm of rāga ālāpana. Examination of a range of data turns many common conceptions of rhythm, beat, and freedom in South Asian music on their heads.


Popular Music ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-334
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Love

AbstractThis article examines how Roberto Leydi and Giovanna Marini, two important figures of the Italian ‘folk revival’, negotiated diverse American cultural influences and adapted them to the political context of Italy in the 1950s and 1960s. I argue that American musical traditions offered them valuable models even as many Italian intellectuals and artists grew more critical of US society and foreign policy. To explore this phenomenon in greater depth, I take as examples two particular moments of exchange. I first discuss American folklorist Alan Lomax's research in Italy and its impact on Leydi's career. I then examine how Marini employed American talking blues in order to reject US society in her first ballad, Vi parlo dell'America (I Speak to You of America) (1966). These two cases provide specific examples of how American influence worked in postwar Italy and the role of folk music in this process.


Music ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Seter

Writings about music in Israel illuminate a wide range of topics, often exploring the politics of social identities: nationalism, folklorism, Orientalism, ethnicity, multiculturalism, East-West cultural borrowings and appropriations, representation, religion, and gender. Complementing the Oxford Bibliographies articles on “Jewish Music” and “Jews and Music” (by Edwin Seroussi and Judah Cohen, respectively, both of which focus mostly on ethnomusicological research into ethnic, liturgical, and popular musics in the Diaspora), this bibliography focuses primarily on Western art music by Israeli composers, yet it also examines selected writings on ethnic and popular musics that inform it. Most of the approximately forty notable immigrant composers who fled fascist Europe to British Palestine during the 1930s and 1940s—the founders of Israeli art music—aspired both to create local music and to continue their original styles from their native countries, mostly Germany, Russia, and Poland, or those they studied in France and elsewhere. As participants in the evolving Hebraic and Zionist culture, they believed that they should partake in the creation of a native, Hebrew musical style, informed by local Jewish ethnic sources that had arrived in Israel from the Mizraḥi Jewish Diaspora, often from Yemen, Iraq, or Morocco, or from those of the Palestinian Arabs. This ideology was passionately disseminated, argued, contested, and ultimately stamped as narrowly nationalistic. Beyond general and themed overviews, as well as reference works and other research tools, this bibliography focuses on the writings by and about the founders. It emphasizes those founders whose works were most widely performed and discussed, namely the Israeli Five: Paul Ben-Haim (b. 1897–d. 1984), Alexander Uriah Boskovich (b. 1907–d. 1964), Oedoen Partos (b. 1907– d. 1977), Josef Tal (b. 1910–d. 2008), and Mordecai Seter (b. 1916–d. 1994). It also examines composers who studied with the them and therefore considered themselves “second generation,” such as Yehezkel Braun (b. 1922–d. 2014) and Tzvi Avni (b. 1927); selected peers of the second cohort who immigrated to Israel in the late 1960s and the 1970s, notably Mark Kopytman (b. 1929–d. 2011) and André Hajdu (b. 1932–d. 2016); and a number of younger composers, including Betty Olivero (b. 1954). For the founders and many of their successors, the desire to create “Israeli” rather than “Jewish” music—either following common, essentialist stereotypes and signifiers, or creating neonationalist, Bartókian-, or Stravinskian-influenced local art—was paramount, whether or not they spoke or wrote about it explicitly. Yet others—and often the same composers at later stages in their lives—attempted to follow European and, more recently, American trends. While for many the word “Jewish” has often denoted Ashkenazi characteristics, “Israeli” entailed the use of Mizraḥi melodic and rhythmic elements; that is, elements from the musical traditions of the Jewish communities who fled to Israel from Arab countries and of the indigenous Palestinians. These formative, defining ideologies characterize the music of the founders but less so younger composers, who feel free to defy it. Still, Israeli compositions often receive local prizes and wider reception when they refer to local culture, folklore, identities, ethnicities, and politics. Acknowledgments: I am deeply grateful to my friends and colleagues who helped with their comments, most notably Yosef Goldenberg, Uri Golomb, and Ralph Locke, whose eagle-eyed comments over multiple iterations transformed this article. I am also indebted to Judith Cohen (Israel), Judit Frigyesi, Yoel Greenberg, Jehoash Hirshberg, Bonny Miller, Marina Ritzarev, Edwin Seroussi, Assaf Shelleg, and Laura Yust, who all took the time to read, encourage, and provide content and editing comments that helped polish this article. This large-scale project could not have been what it is without all of your contributions. Finally, this work was partly supported by an NEH Fellowship.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 639 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlhan Ersoy

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>This article examines the diversity in music with a “sociological/social” centered perspective. Based on the fact that music has a social basis independent of all other musical components, the article asserts that different societies have different kinds of music at both the national and international scale. In other words, the differentiation of societies also differs the music they produce and consume. This approach theoretically carries the subject over to the grounds of ethnomusicology which is a musical discipline that leans against anthropology.</p><p>The article first examines the relationship between music-society providing examples regarding the fact that there is a differentiation in music just as societies are separated into different layers. Afterwards, the relationships of <em>Turkish Art Music </em>and <em>Turkish Folk Music </em>with different social layers at different geographies are taken into consideration.</p><p>Secondly, the article also carries out evaluations on the differentiation of <em>Turkish Art Music </em>and <em>Turkish Folk Music</em> on a social basis as two different musical traditions of Turkey. It has been put forth through various examples in the article that Turkish Art Music is a music type that has developed under the auspices of the ruling class. Whereas Turkish Folk Music has not received sufficient attention from the ruling class even if it has been supported from time to time. In addition, it has been argued that Turkish Folk Music is a type of music that contains different cultures and local traces instead of being the only type of music adopted by the public.</p><p>The cultural context of music has been examined in the final section of the article thereby making evaluations by way of concepts such as public culture, learned culture and hybrid culture.</p><p><strong>Öz</strong></p><p>Bu makale, müzikteki çeşitliliği, “sosyolojik/toplumsal” merkezli bir bakış açısıyla incelemektedir. Yani makale, var olan diğer müziksel bileşenlerden bağımsız bir biçimde, müziklerin toplumsal bir zemini olduğundan hareket ederek hem ulusal hem de uluslararası ölçekte, farklı toplumların farklı müziklere sahip olduğunu savunmaktadır. Bir başka ifadeyle, toplumların farklılaşması, onların ürettikleri ve tükettikleri müzikleri de farklılaştırır. Bu yaklaşım, konuyu kuramsal olarak, antropolojiye yaslanan müziksel bir disiplin olan, etnomüzikoloji zeminine de taşımaktadır.</p><p>Makalede öncelikle müzik-toplum ilişkisi incelenerek toplumların farklı tabakalara ayrılması gibi müzikte de bir farklılaşmanın olduğu konusunda örnekler sunulmaktadır. Sonrasında ise <em>Türk Sanat Müziği</em> ve <em>Türk Halk Müziği</em> türlerinin farklı coğrafyalarda farklı toplumsal katmanlar ile ilişkisi ele alınmaktadır. </p><p>Makale ikinci olarak, Türkiye’deki iki farklı müzik geleneği olan <em>Türk Sanat Müziği</em> ve <em>Türk Halk Müziği</em> türlerinin toplumsal zemindeki farklılıkları üzerine değerlendirmeler yapmaktadır. Makalede, Türk Sanat Müziğinin yönetici sınıfın himayesinde gelişen bir müzik türü olduğu ile ilgili örneklere yer verilmiştir. Türk Halk Müziği ise zaman zaman yönetici sınıf tarafından desteklense de bu kesimden yeterli ilgiyi görememiştir. Buna ilaveten, Türk Halk Müziğinin halkın bütünü tarafından benimsenen tek bir müzik türü olmak yerine farklı kültürleri içerisinde barındıran ve yöresel izler taşıyan bir tür olduğu savunulmuştur.</p><p>Makalenin son bölümünde ise müziğin kültürel bağlamı incelenerek halk kültürü, öğrenilmiş kültür ve melez kültür gibi kavramlar üzerinden değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır.</p>


2020 ◽  
pp. 307-309

Is there a causal relationship between the remarkable economic success and rapid upward mobility of American Jews and behavioral patterns on their part that promoted health and the prevention of disease? Jacob Jay Lindenthal offers what he terms “a conjectural analysis” (p. xiii) to suggest such a causality, and he supports his argument with an impressive array of medical sources that scholars of American Jewry have rarely utilized. Lindenthal maintains that Jewish “values, beliefs, traditions, attitudes, and behavioral patterns” have all had a crucial effect on Jewish health (p. xv). He highlights such cultural factors among the Jews as awareness of and concern for health; an emphasis on cleanliness as mandated by Jewish law (halakhah); a cohesive family life; the promotion of education; specific childrearing practices (among them, circumcision, breastfeeding, and maintaining longer time intervals between births); a low rate of alcoholism; and communal charitable institutions and solidarity as playing a decisive role in keeping East European Jewish immigrants in America in relative good health. As he notes, Jewish immigrants in early 20...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document