Why Fed Power Matters

Fed Power ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-63
Author(s):  
Lawrence R. Jacobs ◽  
Desmond King

Chapter 1 introduces the unrivaled political and economic power of America’s Central Bank, the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve Bank is a mutant institution of government. It has enjoyed anonymity from Americans for most of its history even though it wields unparalleled power on domestic policy that is largely free of the traditional system of checks and balances, which routinely grind down presidential and congressional proposals. The exceptionalism of Fed power stands out among the three branches of government within the United States and among democratic capitalist countries. Instead of studying the Federal Reserve as merely a state agency implementing technical monetary and interest rate policy, this book analyzes the Fed as a powerful political institution with its own interests (and market favorites), which its leaders pursue and which contribute to rising economic inequality and racial disparities. The Fed’s exceptional independent capacity and favoritism were spotlighted in its responses to the 2008–2009 Great Recession and the economic and financial turmoil created by the start of the coronavirus in 2020.

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Hoag

Before the founding of the Federal Reserve, bank clearinghouse associations served as an emergency lending facility during the National Bank Era (1863–1913). This article clarifies the operation of clearinghouse loan certificates during panic periods. If clearinghouse loan certificates do not circulate among the general public, then they bear similarities to interbank loans among clearinghouse member banks. In general, the central clearinghouse organization does not act alone as a lender of last resort to make loans from the central clearinghouse to individual member banks.


Author(s):  
Simon James Bytheway ◽  
Mark Metzler

This chapter examines how central bank cooperation became a multilateral enterprise during the opening weeks of the First World War. It was the Bank of England that took the initiative to establish a network of Allied central banks. The US Federal Reserve System was framed in 1913 and went into operation shortly after the war began in Europe. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) also joined the Allied central bank network as soon as it could, well before the US government entered the war. In early 1915, backed by the FRBNY, US private banks began to finance the enormous military purchasing programs run by the British and French governments in the United States.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Woolley

ABSTRACTThe Federal Reserve Bank of the United States is a pre-eminent banking institution, and an institution that has been subject to scrutiny from a wide variety of scholarly perspectives. The object of this article is to review prominent works dealing with the politics of the Federal Reserve, particularly its relations with other institutions and their effects on monetary policy. The review shows that the formal legal independence of a central bank such as the Fed does not mark the end of monetary politics, and its record suggests a greater measure of modesty and caution on the part of enthusiasts for independent central banks.


1978 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.G.P. Matthews ◽  
P.A. Ormerod

The economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis in the United States have produced over a number of years a series of models which amount to a reassertion of the short-run quantity theory of money. This theory has been summarised by Tobin as ‘in the short-run, nominal income is proportional to the supply of money, although changes in nominal income may affect output as well as prices’. In other words, it is postulated that in the short-run there is a large and rapid influence of monetary actions on nominal income relative to that of fiscal actions and, indeed, that fiscal action unaccompanied by changes in money has little net effect on national output even in the short-run. This is an extreme version of the monetarist position, given that most monetarists, including Friedman, choose to work in the framework of the long-run rather than the shortrun quantity theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document