Conclusion
The book’s conclusion insists that we must not start with the question of ‘what should we do differently?’ but rather ‘how might we think differently (about peacemaking in civil war)?’ Having rebuffed solutions of crude design and the dangers of reducing politics to modes of making, there can be no neat and easy answers. Inspired by what the Postscript allows us to see differently, and alongside the book’s core arguments critically appraising the failures of peacemaking in the Sudans over two decades, the conclusion underscores that a different kind of thinking about what politics is and what it demands of us is essential in order to move beyond the tragedy inherent in contemporary peacemaking practice. Only with such thinking, for which the conclusion provokes some new beginnings drawing from ideas on negotiated revolutions and civic republicanism, can other ways of acting in the world become clear and make their claim amidst the unavoidably messy make-do realities of peacemaking in civil wars.