Balaam and Bedlam

Author(s):  
James Whitehead

This chapter shows how contemporary reviews of Romantic poetry, and the hostile rhetoric of insanity they used, both stigmatized and popularized the Romantic mad poet. A forensic rhetoric, drawing directly on medical ideas of partial insanity and critical ‘moral management’, was deployed by the periodical press in the first quarter of the nineteenth century—first the quarterlies like the Edinburgh Review and the Quarterly Review, then later new capricious and aggressive magazines such as Blackwood’s, and more quotidian or staid journals—against all of the major Romantic poets. The chapter shows, moreover, how the polemical terms in which Romantic poets were dismissed also held the seeds of their later canonization. The periodical critics, while they used slurs of meaningless insanity to dismiss poetry for political and reactionary ends, also spread the fame of ‘mad genius’, turning a marginalized opinion on the link between creativity and disorder into a cultural phenomenon.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Fyfe ◽  
Qian Ge

The nineteenth-century British periodical press took textual production to a scale that, for many commentators then and now, summoned the sublime. It was a “flood” which was “too vast to be dealt with as a whole,” in the words of the British Quarterly Review in 1859. It remained “a vast wilderness … its extent unknown, its ramifications unfathomed” for subsequent researchers, according to Michael Wolff in a 1971 issue of the Victorian Periodicals Newsletter. By the numbers for newspapers alone, stamped titles increased almost five-fold from 550 in 1846 to 2,440 in 1906. Simon Eliot estimates the number of copies those newspapers rising from 16 million in 1801 to over 78 million by 1849. By the end of the era, the Daily Mail claimed to circulate a million copies of each issue on its own. The periodical archive has sprawled even more with its gradual digitization which, while representing only a fraction of nineteenth-century print, still astonishes its researchers. “We are now on the brink of a further, exponential expansion … as vast new quantities of hitherto inaccessible records and texts become available for digital searching,” Patrick Leary claimed in 2004. In many ways, nineteenth-century newspapers and periodicals set the very terms for not simply “digital searching” but quantitative methods, having only ever existed as “numbers” (a term for individual issues) in a state of impossible profusion, seeming to welcome computational approaches to the unruly digital archive.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-185
Author(s):  
Diana Cooper-Richet

In the historical context of the development and modernization of the press, of an increasingly intense transnational circulation of ideas and of editorial styles, this essay sets out to analyze the reasons why reading rooms specialized in the foreign-language press, especially in English—for which the market was narrow—were successful in Paris during the first half of the nineteenth century. It examines the consequences of the circulation of the normally difficult to access British periodicals and newspapers, such as the Edinburgh Review, the Quarterly Review and the Westminster Review present in these reading rooms, on the transformation of the French media system. In the 1850s and 1860s, the wind started to change direction. By then, on the other side of the Channel, Alexander Macmillan and Mathew Arnold had become fervent admirers of the famous Revue des deux mondes. This turnabout testifies to the complexity of the mechanisms at work behind transnational cultural transfers and media innovation in France and in Britain at the time.


1923 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-634
Author(s):  
Leonard D. White ◽  
Raymond Leslie Buell ◽  
Harold C. Havighurst

I. English. The following summary of articles in the English journals is confined, in conformity with the review appearing in 1921, to discussions of governmental organization, structure, process, and procedure. The journals here included (1921–1922 inclusive) are The Edinburgh Review, Nineteenth Century, Contemporary Review, Fortnightly Review, Quarterly Review, Journal of Comparative Legislation, Round Table, and The Journal of Public Administration.


Author(s):  
Kitty Hauser

When, in 1978, the poet, critic, and editor Geoffrey Grigson (1905–85) was asked by the Times Literary Supplement which journals had influenced him when young, he answered that one magazine, Antiquity, founded and edited then by O. G. S. Crawford, still seems to me to have been the flower of all periodicals familiar to me in my day. In that treasury, so decently laid out (and so well printed . . . ), prehistory, and history, rather as it was understood by Marc Bloch in France, and later by W. G. Hoskins, and imagination, received a stimulus such as no periodical administered to literature. Antiquity was begun in 1927 by the field archaeologist O. G. S. Crawford (1886–1957) as a quarterly review aiming to disseminate the findings of a new generation of archaeologists in an accessible style and a visually attractive format. For Grigson, this journal most fitted the bill, in the late 1920s and 1930s, of what he calls the ‘periodical of Utopia’ that Tolstoy had called for in 1858. Tolstoy wanted a journal proclaiming the ‘independence and eternity of art’, where art would be saved from the politics that was engulfing nineteenth-century Russia, threatening to destroy or defile art. Such a journal was Grigson’s ideal, too. Drawing an implicit parallel between Tolstoy’s Moscow of 1858 and politicized interwar Britain, he decried the endemic admixture of politics with art in the periodical press at this time, when every ‘shrewd editor’ had an ‘axe to grind’. One of his favourites, the New Republic, while excellent, ‘came under the curse . . . which ordains that most literary journalism in our language must be for ever mixed with politics’. T. S. Eliot’s journal The Criterion was tainted by the same ‘curse’: ‘covert politics’, claimed Grigson, ‘slightly defiled its superiority’. Only in Antiquity, it seems, could Grigson discern art—‘independent and eternal’—without the defiling politics or the dullness that accompanied it in other journals and weeklies. Only in a publication that did not claim to deal with art could he find what he was looking for, as he viewed this archaeological journal through the lens of poetry. Antiquity, he wrote, made ‘all the past with firework colours burn’—a line he borrowed from Wyndham Lewis’s poem about Sir Thomas Browne’s antiquarian tract Urne Buriall.


Author(s):  
William Christie

The opening decades of the nineteenth century, which we know as the Romantic period, was also the great age of periodical literature, at the centre of which were the Edinburgh Review, the Quarterly Review, and later the Westminster Review, each offering a politically inflected conspectus of current knowledge and creative literature that was often aggressively argumentative and assumed greater authority than both author and reader. And the big Reviews were by no means the only places where the Romantic reader could find clever, scathing, though often well-informed and well-argued reviews, which contributed to the high degree of literary self-consciousness we associate with Romantic literature. This chapter looks at the phenomenon of critical reviewing in the Romantic period, at the mythologies that grew up around it as an institution, and at some of the ramifications of its critical severity for the evolution of creative literature.


Author(s):  
Pam Perkins

Pam Perkins examines the role played by late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century periodicals in both demarcating and blurring contemporary ideas around feminine writing. The essay provides an overview of critical attitudes about women’s writing and the way it was treated in major Romantic-era periodicals (the Edinburgh Review, British Critic, Anti-Jacobin), and then complicates this picture with case studies in the receptions of the writers Anne Grant and Elizabeth Hamilton, whose work pushed back against traditional generic tendencies. Both were praised, surprisingly, for being innovators as well as for evincing proper femininity. Their visibility in the print media of their own day helped to normalise the concept of female authorship, and urges us to re-examine modern critical understandings of the role that periodicals played in early Romantic norms for gendered writing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-372
Author(s):  
Jan Švábenický

Abstract This study examines journalistic, publicist, and critical discourse in relation to the popular genres in the Italian cinema of the 1960s and 1970s in Czechoslovak film and non-film periodical press. Of interest are mainly comprehensive texts that analyse Italian popular genres as a genre system and a specific corpus of films that belong to the same genre. Czech and Slovak translations of foreign studies and texts (with the exception of some examples), interviews with Italian filmmakers, short glosses, or informative texts are beyond the scope of this research. This study reflects critical, journalistic, and publicist interpretations and views by Czechoslovak press of popular genres in national Italian cinema in the selected historical period. Research is divided into two parts that develop specific aspects of these analytic questions. The first part analyses texts about this subject matter in various film a and non-film periodicals, including newspapers and journals with emphasis on long studies and interpretations of a few categories of popular genres viewed in the extensive context of their national, socio-cultural, iconographic, and industrial aspects. The second part deals only with the popular genre of western all’italiana (western in Italian style), which represented an international cinematic and socio-cultural phenomenon in the 1960s and 1970s and was of the greatest interest to Czechoslovak critics, journalists, and publicists in relation to popular genres of Italian cinema in general.


Romanticism ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
SARAH WOOTTON

Almost two hundred years after the publication of the first two cantos of Childe Harold's Pilgrimage, the Byronic hero remains, as Andrew Elfenbein argues, an ‘unprecedented cultural phenomenon’.1 This essay is not concerned with the more direct descendants of the Byronic hero (Rochester and Heathcliff, for example); rather, I shall be focusing on the less immediately obvious, and in some respects more complex, reincarnations of the Byronic hero in two nineteenth-century novels, George Eliot's Middlemarch and Elizabeth Gaskell's North and South. Establishing previously neglected connections between these authors and the figure of the Byronic hero not only opens new avenues of debate in relation to these novels, but also permits a reassessment of the extent and significance of Byron's influence in the Victorian period. The following questions will be addressed: first, why does a Byronic presence feature so prominently in the work of nineteenth-century women writers; second, what is distinctive about Eliot and Gaskell's respective treatments of this figure; and, third, how is the Byronic hero subsequently reinvented, and to what effect, in modern screen adaptations of their work?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document