Reason and Religion in Modern History
This chapter focuses on Victorian debates over the intellectual origins of modernity. These hinged on competing interpretations of the place of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in the history of ‘mind’. Secularly inclined sociological critics such as Henry Thomas Buckle, who held to an epistemological phenomenalism influenced by John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte, hailed these periods for having refined the inductive sciences which drove true progress. An alternative reading of post-Reformation intellectual history, developed by John Tulloch and others, and attacked by agnostics, instead credited it with having made rational theology possible. Underlying these debates was the question of whether experience was confined to the world of sense data, or else also encompassed the intuitive powers of mind. William Inge, in dialogue with Idealist philosophy, developed the latter possibility, in ways that hinted at the development of the apologetic authority of history into a new concern with the psychology of religion.