The Chemistry of Extended Oxide Surfaces

Author(s):  
Bruce C. Bunker ◽  
William H. Casey

In Chapters 4 and 5, we demonstrated that local structures and charge distributions have an enormous impact on the equilibrium constants, trajectories, and kinetics of reactions involving soluble oxide precursors. In this chapter, we highlight those features that make reactions on extended oxide surfaces either similar to or dramatically different from the reactions documented in hydrolysis diagrams for each metal cation (see Chapter 5). We first describe oxide surface structures and then discuss how these structures impact both acid–base and ligand-exchange phenomena. In addition to dense oxides, we also introduce some of the chemistry associated with layered materials. Lamellar materials are important from both a fundamental and technological perspective, because water and ions can readily penetrate such structures and provide conditions under which almost every oxygen anion is at an oxide–water interface (see Chapter 10 and Chapter 11). This chapter focuses on oxides containing octahedral cations. The distinctive chemistry of oxides based on tetrahedral cations, including the clay minerals and the zeolites, are the focus of Part Five. The structures of bulk oxides were introduced in Chapter 2. However, for many oxides, the surface structures that interact with aqueous solutions are substantially different from structures found in the bulk. Here, we introduce the basic principles of oxide surfaces that make them chemically active. As a starting point, consider ideal oxide surfaces containing +2 octahedral cations. Pristine oxide surfaces can be created by cleaving perfect crystals in an ultrahigh-vacuum environment. The creation of new surfaces requires an expenditure of energy corresponding to the cohesive energy of the solid, which in turn represents the energy required to break every bond along a given fracture plane. For MgO, the Mg−O bond energy is 380 kJ/mole. Each surface created contains 1.4.1019 oxygen atoms/m2, or 2.4.10−5 moles of bonds. Because two surfaces are created in the fracture event, the initial interfacial energy of each resulting MgO surface is (1/2)(380 kJ/mole)/(2.4_10−5 mole/m2 )=4560 mJ/m2.

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 5737-5741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junfei Ou ◽  
Weihua Hu ◽  
Changquan Li ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Mingshan Xue ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 964-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Emoto ◽  
Koichi Akimoto ◽  
Ayahiko Ichimiya

A new X-ray diffraction technique has been developed in order to measure the strain field near a solid surface under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions. The X-ray optics use an extremely asymmetric Bragg-case bulk reflection. The glancing angle of the X-rays can be set near the critical angle of total reflection by tuning the X-ray energy. Using this technique, rocking curves for Si surfaces with different surface structures, i.e. a native oxide surface, a slightly oxide surface and an Si(111) 7 × 7 surface, were measured. It was found that the widths of the rocking curves depend on the surface structures. This technique is efficient in distinguishing the strain field corresponding to each surface structure.


2004 ◽  
Vol 393 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kornherr ◽  
Samuel A French ◽  
Alexey A Sokol ◽  
C.Richard A Catlow ◽  
Selma Hansal ◽  
...  

Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Weiyong Cui ◽  
Yibing Zhang ◽  
Jianhua Chen ◽  
Cuihua Zhao ◽  
Yuqiong Li ◽  
...  

First-principle calculations were used to investigate the surface structure and electronic properties of sulfide (pyrite, galena, and sphalerite) and oxide minerals (hematite, cerussite, and smithsonite). Surface relaxation and Femi energy, as well as projected DOS, are considered. Results show that the surface atoms of the sulfide minerals are more susceptible and more easily affected by the fracture bonds. The sulfide surfaces possess higher chemical potential than the corresponding oxide surfaces, and are more likely to be electron donors in reactions. The S 3p states are the mainly contributing states in the sulfide surface, while that in the oxide surface are O 2p states. The bonds of the sulfide surface have more covalent features and that of the oxide surface are ionic interactions. The O–M (M represents Fe, Pb or Zn) bonds are more stable, as the DOS of the oxide surfaces distribute in the lower energy range.


2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Hoop ◽  
David C. Kennedy ◽  
Trevor Mishki ◽  
Gregory P. Lopinski ◽  
John Paul Pezacki

The benzoin condensation that involves the umpolung coupling of two aldehyde groups has been applied to the formation of functionalized silicon and silicon oxide surfaces using thiamine and other N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis in water. This bioorthogonal conjugation of an aldehyde to a modified silicon or silicon oxide surface has been monitored and characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and IR spectroscopy. NHC catalysis was found to be efficient in water mediating full conversion of the aldehyde functionalized silicon oxide surfaces at the interface.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (13) ◽  
pp. 7174-7181
Author(s):  
Blake MacQueen ◽  
Benjamin Ruiz-Yi ◽  
Michael Royko ◽  
Andreas Heyden ◽  
Yomaira J. Pagan-Torres ◽  
...  

1972 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hetzron

In the present study I am adducing arguments against the assumption that there is a discrete level of grammar where all syntactic operation has stopped and the assignment of phonetic values to the then existing structure (the output of transformations) begins.The concept of ‘surface structure’ has received the following definitions in Chomsky's various works: ‘a proper bracketing of the linear, temporarily given sequence of elements, with the paired brackets labelled by category names (that is a labelled tree diagram, with such categories as Sentence, Noun Phrase, Verb Phrase, Noun, and a small number of others serving as labels)' (Chomsky, 1966: 21), ‘the organization into categories and phrases that is directly associated with the physical signal’ (Chomsky, 1968:25). These definitions take the physical event of speech as a starting point, and refer to the organization of the sentence on this level (cf. Chomsky, 1965a: 15). One finds, on the other hand, that in the Chomskyan system ‘surface structure’ is also defined in terms of derivation, as the last item in a finite sequence of phrase-markers, the output of the transformations (Chomsky, 1970: 53 f., 87), and such surface structures ‘are mapped into phonetic representations by the phonological rules’ (ibid.: 54) and are assigned intonational contours by rules of phonological interpretation (ibid.: 77). This is summed up in the formula ‘phonology: Pn→phonetic representation’ (ibid.: 87, where Pn is the surface structure, the last phrase-marker).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document