The Mandatory Bid

Author(s):  
David Kershaw

This Chapter explores the nature, the origins and optimality of the mandatory bid rule. It first provides an account of “voluntary” nature of the mandatory bid rule as well as the evolution of the rule from on obligation imposed on selling target directors and major shareholders to an obligation placed upon shareholders following the crossing of ownership thresholds. The Chapter outlines the contemporary mandatory bid rules, including the trigger points, the Code’s policing of the trigger points, and the distinctive and more onerous terms of a mandatory bid. The final part of the Chapter considers the justifications for, and the effects and optimality of, the rule. It concludes that the traditional rationales given in support of the rule are weak and that the theoretical case that the rule is more likely to prevent efficient or inefficient transactions is inconclusive and there are is supportive empirical evidence on either side of the debate. It seems probable that the rule affects ownership structure by deterring the formation of control blocks but whether this is a net welfare gain or loss is unclear, particularly in the UK which benefits from strong minority protection rules. Given weak rationales and this uncertainty about the effects of the rule the Chapter argues that the rule should be retained in the Code and enforced by the Panel but it should be optional for companies. Whether it applies to any particular target company should depend on whether the company has opted out of the rule through its constitution.

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Downing

The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment and food chain in the UK has produced one of the most visible and enduring controversies of recent times. Amid ongoing claim and counter-claim by actors on either side of the GM ‘debate’ over the salient ‘facts’ or balance of risks and benefits associated with the technology, this controversy can be fruitfully seen as a struggle between contested networks of knowledge. Drawing on ethnographic data collected during recent PhD fieldwork, I focus on those, loosely defined as members of ‘local food networks’ in SW England, who perceive their values and cultural projects to be at risk from the deployment of this technology. In scrutinizing how distinctly ‘oppositional’ knowledge is created, exchanged and transformed particularly in relation to the construction and maintenance of cultural and historical boundaries, I suggest that in this arena a key vehicle of knowledge transfer is the narrative or story. A successfully deployed narrative can resolve uncertainties, or equally, dissolve undesirable certainties. Knowledge transfer thus becomes a matter of rhetoric, of persuasion, whereby skilfully deployed narratives can be viewed as analogical networks of associations - enrolling culturally appropriate characters, values and concepts - to move the targeted audience in the desired manner. I argue that such transfers must be seen not only as exchanges of networks of knowledge but also of networks of ignorance, for as the ethnographic data reveals, when the stakes are perceived to be so high, ideological coherence often outweighs empirical evidence and logical consistency. This raises a critical dilemma for the ethnographer. What should he/she do when confronted in the field by exaggerated claims or misinformation?


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-183
Author(s):  
Uhomoibhi Aburime Toni

Ownership structure is considered an important factor that affects a firm’s health. If ownership structure affects a firm’s health, it is possible then to use the ownership structure to predict firm profitability. Against this backdrop, this paper analyzes the relationship between ownership structure and bank profitability in Nigeria. There are two motivations for this paper. Firstly, midway into the banks consolidation exercise in Nigeria, the CBN identified the need for a determination of the most appropriate composition of bank capitalization that would enhance the individual and systemic profitability and efficiency of banks in Nigeria post-consolidation. Hence, it decided to minimize state governments’ investment in banks during the exercise and also issued a December 2007 ultimatum to all tiers of governments that have stakes in banks to dilute their investments to a maximum of 10 per cent. Unfortunately, the CBN did not state any econometrically-based rationale giving credence to its directives. Secondly, the effect of ownership structure and concentration on a firm’s performance is an important issue in the literature of finance theory. However, no researcher has studied this important aspect of finance theory in the Nigerian context. It is worth noting that most research on ownership structure and firm performance has been dominated by studies conducted in developed countries. However, there is an increasing awareness that theories originating from developed countries such as the USA and the UK may have limited applicability to emerging markets. Emerging markets have different characteristics such as different political, economic and institutional conditions, which limit the application of developed markets’ empirical models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document