scholarly journals 112 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits at a university medical centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e81-e82
Author(s):  
Viviane Mallette ◽  
Claude Cyr
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Medical Centre ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Traumatic Injuries ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Primary Subject area Emergency Medicine - Paediatric Background The new coronavirus, SARS-Cov-2, responsible for a global pandemic, led to the declaration of a health emergency and the implementation of large-scale public health measures by governments in 2020. Those measures, combined with the overlapping symptoms of COVID-19 disease and common viral infections in children, have led hospitals to prepare for possible changes in volume of emergency room visits by children. Objectives This study aims to determine the effect of the pandemic and governmental restrictions on the use of the emergency department by pediatric patients at a university medical centre, as well as to assess the impact on the severity of initial presentations. Design/Methods A single-centre study was conducted at a university hospital among children aged 0 to 17 who visited the emergency room. We used interrupted time series analysis to compare the average of pre-COVID-19 data (from January 1 2017, to December 31 2019) with data from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1 to September 2020). Emergency room visits, initial triage codes, and admission and pediatric consultation rates were analyzed to assess whether there was a significant difference between periods. Results An important increase in total daily visits (+11.18, 95% CI [6.23-16.14]) was first observed with the emergence of COVID-19 cases in Canada. Then, during the strict confinement, which corresponds to an active period of COVID-19, we detected a significant drop in daily visits (-25.64, 95% CI [-30.4 to -20.66]), which continued while progressively loosening restrictions. The proportion of admissions and pediatric consultations rose slightly only throughout the time of intensive health measures (respectively +4.07% and +3.32%), but no changes in the severity of the triage codes at the emergency department were observed for all periods. Traumatic injuries also saw a significant decrease (p=0.018) when comparing data by groups of diagnosis. Conclusion These results show a significantly lower number of children’s visits to the emergency room of a university medical centre, and a transient increase in pediatric care with little impact on the immediate severity of the initial presentations during strict government health measures in the first wave of COVID-19. These measures also had a beneficial effect in reducing the number of traumatic injuries.

scholarly journals P035: Impact of EMS direct referral to community care on emergency department utilization

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S75
Author(s):  
A. Dukelow ◽  
M. Lewell ◽  
J. Loosley ◽  
S. Pancino ◽  
K. Van Aarsen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The Community Referral by Emergency Medical Services (CREMS) program was implemented in January 2015 in Southwestern Ontario. The program allows Paramedics interacting with a patient to directly refer those in need of home care support to their local Community Care Access Centre (CCAC) for needs assessment. If indicated, subsequent referrals are made to specific services (e.g. nursing, physiotherapy and geriatrics) by CCAC. Ideally, CREMS connects patients with appropriate, timely care, supporting individual needs. Previous literature has indicated CREMS results in an increase of home care services provided to patients. Methods: The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the impact of the CREMS program on Emergency Department utilization. Data for all CCAC referrals from London-Middlesex EMS was collected for a thirteen month period (February 2015-February 2016). For all patients receiving a new or increased service from CCAC the number of Emergency Department visits 2 years before referral and 2 years after referral were calculated. A related samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was performed to examine the difference in ED visits pre and post referral to CCAC. Results: There were 213 individuals who received a new or increased service during the study timeframe. Median [IQR] patient age was 77 [70-85.5]. 113/213 (53%) of patients were female. The majority of patients 135/213 (63.4%) were a new referral to CCAC. The median [IQR] number of hospital visits before referral was 3 [1-5] and after referral was 2 [0-4]. There was no significant difference in the overall number of ED visits before versus after referral (955 vs 756 visits, p = 0.051). Conclusion: Community based care can improve patient experience and health outcomes. Paramedics are in a unique position to assess patients in their home to determine who might benefit from home care services. CREMS referrals for this patient group showed a trend towards decreased ED visits after referral but the trend was not statistically significant.

The impact of pharmacist telephone calls after discharge on satisfaction of oncology patients: A randomized controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sewar S Salmany ◽  
Lujeen Ratrout ◽  
Abdallah Amireh ◽  
Randa Agha ◽  
Noor Nassar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the impact of telephone follow-up calls on satisfaction in oncology patients after hospital discharge. Method A randomized controlled study, in which patients were randomized into two groups: The experimental group with the telephone follow-up (TFU) calls (intervention) and the control group (no intervention). The telephone follow-up call was conducted within 72 h after discharge. During the call, patients were asked about their medications, namely, whether they received them, understood how to take them, and whether they developed any medication-related adverse effect. Both groups were contacted by phone two weeks later to assess their satisfaction with the discharge medication instructions and the provided pharmaceutical services, using the 5-point Likert scale. In addition, hospital records were reviewed for emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge. Results There was no difference in the percentage of patients who reported being very satisfied between both the intervention and the control groups (45% intervention vs. 48% control, P = 0.68). The mean time of the intervention phone call was 3 ± 1.7 (SD) min. During the telephone follow-up call, medication-related problems were identified in 20% of the patients. There was no significant difference in emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in the intervention group vs. control (44% vs. 53%, P = 0.123) and (37% vs. 43%, P = 0.317), respectively. Conclusion Telephone follow-up calls conducted by a pharmacist to discharged oncology patients did not improve patients' satisfaction, emergency room visits or hospital readmissions; however, they helped to identify medication-related adverse effects in the oncology patients.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department visits: A population-based study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252441
Author(s):  
Elissa Rennert-May ◽  
Jenine Leal ◽  
Nguyen Xuan Thanh ◽  
Eddy Lang ◽  
Shawn Dowling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
System Capacity ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Background As a result of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there have been widespread changes in healthcare access. We conducted a retrospective population-based study in Alberta, Canada (population 4.4 million), where there have been approximately 1550 hospital admissions for COVID-19, to determine the impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department (ED visits), following initiation of a public health emergency act on March 15, 2020. Methods We used multivariable negative binomial regression models to compare daily numbers of medical/surgical hospital admissions via the ED between March 16-September 23, 2019 (pre COVID-19) and March 16-September 23, 2020 (post COVID-19 public health measures). We compared the most frequent diagnoses for hospital admissions pre/post COVID-19 public health measures. A similar analysis was completed for numbers of daily ED visits for any reason with a particular focus on ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). Findings There was a significant reduction in both daily medical (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.86, p<0.001) and surgical (IRR 0.82, p<0.001) admissions through the ED in Alberta post COVID-19 public health measures. There was a significant decline in daily ED visits (IRR 0.65, p<0.001) including ACSC (IRR 0.75, p<0.001). The most common medical/surgical diagnoses for hospital admissions did not vary substantially pre and post COVID-19 public health measures, though there was a significant reduction in admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a significant increase in admissions for mental and behavioral disorders due to use of alcohol. Conclusions Despite a relatively low volume of COVID-19 hospital admissions in Alberta, there was an extensive impact on our healthcare system with fewer admissions to hospital and ED visits. This work generates hypotheses around causes for reduced hospital admissions and ED visits which warrant further investigation. As most publicly funded health systems struggle with health-system capacity routinely, understanding how these reductions can be safely sustained will be critical.

Evaluation of Early Versus Late Postdischarge Medication Reconciliation on Readmission Rates and Emergency Department Visits

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Joseph ◽  
Rebecca A. Barros ◽  
Elise Kim ◽  
Bupendra Shah
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Late Group ◽  
Hospital Use

Background: The current literature speculates ideal postdischarge follow-up focusing on transitions from hospital to home can range anywhere between 48 hours and 2 weeks. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal timing of follow-up visit to prevent readmissions. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of early (<48 hours) versus late (48 hours-14 days) postdischarge medication reconciliation on readmissions and emergency department (ED) use. Methods: In this retrospective study, data for patients who had a clinic visit with a primary care provider (PCP), clinical pharmacist, or both for postdischarge medication reconciliation were reviewed. Primary outcome included hospital use rate at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included hospital use rate at 90 days and hospital use rate with a postdischarge PCP follow-up visit, clinical pharmacist, or both at 30 days. Results: One hundred sixty patients were included in the analysis: 31 early group patients and 129 late group patients. There was no significant difference on hospital use at 30 days in patients who received early or late groups (32.3% vs 21.8%, P = .947). There was also no significant difference on hospital use at 90 days in patients in early versus late group (51.6% vs 50.3%, P = .842). The type of provider (PCP vs pharmacists) conducting postdischarge medication reconciliation did not show significance on hospital use at 30 days (19.9% vs 21.4%, P = .731). Conclusion: Results from this study suggest patients can be seen up to 14 days postdischarge for medication reconciliation with no significant difference on hospital use.

scholarly journals An Ecological Analysis of the Impact of Temperature Inversion on Emergency Department Visits for Respiratory Syndromes and Subsyndromes using BioSense 2.0 Frontend Data

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Burke ◽  
David Jackson ◽  
Allyn K. Nakashima
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Air Quality ◽  
Salt Lake ◽  
Temperature Inversion ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Ecological Analysis ◽  
Lake County ◽  
The Impact

This analysis used BioSense 2.0 frontend data to evaluate the impact of air quality indeces on emergency department visits for respiratory syndromes and subsyndromes during wintertime inversions in Salt Lake County, UT. Most syndromes and subsyndromes occurred more frequently on days with higher AQI and aberration alarms were more likely to be triggered on days with higher AQI for ILI, pleurisy, and respiratory failure. After adjusting for seasonality, the AQI was significantly associated with the proportion of emergency room visits for RSV, ILI, and the respiratory syndrome. These results suggest frontend data may be useful for ecological air quality analyses.

scholarly journals LO66: Did the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign work? A retrospective analysis of its impact on emergency department imaging utilization for head injuries

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S50-S51
Author(s):  
S. Masood ◽  
L.B. Chartier
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Choosing Wisely ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Imaging Utilization ◽  
Ct Head ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Head injuries are a commonly encountered presentation in emergency departments (ED) and the Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign was released in June 2015 in an attempt to decrease imaging utilization for patients with minor head injuries. The impact of the CWC campaign on imaging utilization for head injuries has not been explored in the ED setting. In our study, we describe the characteristics of patients with head injuries presenting to a tertiary care academic ED and the impact of the CWC campaign on CT head utilization. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used linked databases from the province of Ontario, Canada to assess emergency department visits with a primary diagnosis of head injury made between June 1, 2014 and Aug 31, 2016 at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada. We examined the number of visits during the study period, the proportion of patients that had a CT head performed before and after the release of the CWC campaign, as well as mode of arrival, and disposition. Results: There were 4,322 qualifying visits at our site during the study period. The median presenting age was 44.12 years (IQR 27.83,67.45), the median GCS was 15 (IQR 15,15) and the majority of patients presenting had intermediate acuity (CTAS 3). Overall, 43.17% of patients arrived via ambulance, 49.24 % of patients received a CT head and 10.46% of patients were admitted. Compared to patients presenting before the CWC campaign release, there was no significant difference in the rate of CT heads after the CWC (50.41% vs 47.68%, P=0.07). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in mode of arrival (ambulance vs ambulatory) (42.94% vs 43.48%, P=0.72) or admission rates (9.85% vs 11.26%, P=0.15). However, more patients belonged to the high acuity groups (CTAS 1 or 2) in the post CWC campaign release group (12.98% vs 8.11% P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Visits for head injuries make up a significant proportion of total ED visits and approximately half of these patients receive CT imaging in the ED. The CWC campaign did not seem to impact imaging utilization for head injuries in the 14 months following its launch. Further efforts, including local quality improvement initiatives, are likely needed to increase adherence to its recommendation and reduce imaging utilization for head injuries.

scholarly journals Impact of Pharmacist-led Discharge Counseling on Hospital Readmission and Emergency Department Visits: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Bonetti ◽  
Walleri C Reis ◽  
Antonio M Mendes ◽  
Inajara Rotta ◽  
Fernanda S Tonin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care can contribute to medication errors and other adverse drug events. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led discharge counseling on hospital readmission and emergency department visits through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), along with a manual search (July 2017). PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068444. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers performed all the steps of the systematic review process (screening of titles and abstracts, full-text appraisal, data extraction, and quality assessment), with contributions from a third researcher. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on pharmacist-led discharge counseling. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary extracted outcomes were emergency department visits and hospital readmission rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses of intervention versus usual care for hospital readmission and emergency department visit rates were performed using the inverse variance method. Results are reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Prediction intervals (PIs) were also calculated. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed. A total of 21 RCTs were included in the qualitative synthesis and 18 in the meta-analyses (n = 7,244 patients). The original meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in the impact between pharmacist-led discharge counseling and usual care on overall hospital readmission (RR = 0.864 [95% CI 0.763-0.997], P = .020) and emergency department (RR = 0.697 [95% CI 0.535-0.907], P = .007) visits. However, the small number of included studies, the high heterogeneity among trials (I2 between 40% and 60%), and the wide PIs (hospital readmission: PI 0.542-1.186; emergency department visits: PI 0.027-1.367) prevented drawing further conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists regarding the effect of pharmacist-led discharge counseling on hospital readmission and emergency department visits. Further well-designed clinical trials with defined core outcome sets are needed.

scholarly journals Examining the impact of mental disease on type 2 diabetes outcomes: results from the EpiChron Cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Guerrero Fernández de Alba ◽  
A Gimeno-Miguel ◽  
B Poblador Plou ◽  
K Bliek Bueno ◽  
J Carmona Pirez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Mental Disease ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Mental Diseases ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is often accompanied by other chronic diseases, including mental diseases (MD). This work aimed at studying MD prevalence in T2D patients and analyse its impact on T2D health outcomes. Methods Retrospective, observational study of individuals of the EpiChron Cohort aged 18 and over with prevalent T2D at baseline (2011) in Aragón, Spain (n = 63,365). Participants were categorized by the existence or absence of MD, defined as the presence of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia or substance abuse. MD prevalence was calculated, and a logistic regression model was performed to analyse the likelihood of the four studied health outcomes (4-year all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, T2D-hospitalization, and emergency room visits) based on the presence of each type of MD, after adjusting by age, sex and number of comorbidities. Results Mental diseases were observed in 19% of T2D patients, with depression being the most frequent condition, especially in women (20.7% vs. 7.57%). Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with MD (odds ratio -OR- 1.24; 95% confidence interval -CI- 1.16-1.31), especially in those with substance abuse (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.84-2.57) and schizophrenia (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.50-2.21). The presence of MD also increased the risk of T2D-hospitalization (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.18-1.93), emergency room visits (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.21-1.32) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10-1.23). Conclusions The high prevalence of MD among T2D patients, and its association with health outcomes, underscores the importance of providing integrated, person-centred care and early detection of comorbid mental diseases in T2D patients to improve disease management and health outcomes. Key messages Comprehensive care of T2D should include specific strategies for prevention, early detection, and management of comorbidities, especially mental disorders, in order to reduce their impact on health. Substance abuse was the mental disease with the highest risk of T2D-hospitalization, emergency room visits and all-cause hospitalization.

scholarly journals Measuring the impact of an acute visiting scheme on emergency department attendances – a pre-post cohort design

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Kaehne ◽  
Paula Keating
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Access Points ◽  
Latent Demand ◽  
Frequent Attenders ◽  
Cohort Design ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) attendances are contributing to rising costs of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Critically assessing the impact of new services to reduce emergency department use can be difficult as new services may create additional access points, unlocking latent demand. The study evaluated an Acute Visiting Scheme (AVS) in a primary care context. We asked if AVS reduces overall ED demand and whether or not it changed utilisation patterns for frequent attenders. Method The study used a pre post single cohort design. The impact of AVS on all-cause ED attendances was hypothesised as a substitution effect, where AVS duty doctor visits would replace emergency department visits. Primary outcome was frequency of ED attendances. End points were reduction of frequency of service use and increase of intervals between attendances by frequent attenders. Results ED attendances for AVS users rose by 47.6%. If AVS use was included, there was a more than fourfold increase of total service utilisation, amounting to 438.3%. It shows that AVS unlocked significant latent demand. However, there was some reduction in the frequency of ED attendances for some patients and an increase in time intervals between ED attendances for others. Conclusion The study demonstrates that careful analysis of patient utilisation can detect a differential impact of AVS on the use of ED. As the new service created additional access points for patients and hence introduces an element of choice, the new service is likely to unlock latent demand. This study illustrates that AVS may be most useful if targeted at specific patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the new service.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document