scholarly journals Abdominal skin temperature variation in healthy broiler chickens as determined by thermography

2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tessier ◽  
D Du Tremblay ◽  
C Klopfenstein ◽  
G Beauchamp ◽  
M Boulianne
Author(s):  
Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada ◽  
Rosario Salvador Palmer ◽  
Pedro Pérez-Soriano ◽  
Joan Izaguirre ◽  
Rosa Mª Cibrián Ortiz de Anda

Author(s):  
André Luiz Soares ◽  
Antonio Augusto de Paula Xavier ◽  
Ariel Orlei Michaloski

Risk analysis is one of the main tools for preventing the occurrence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders. New methods of risk analysis should seek to be more agile and simplified, encouraging them to be widely applied in work environments. This paper aimed to develop a rapid tool for assessing the risk of developing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) arising from repetitive actions of the upper limbs, while using a thermographic camera to measure skin temperature variation. A workstation was developed in an environmentally controlled laboratory, representing the five levels of risk presented by the Occupational Repetitive Actions Index (OCRA) Index, which were performed by 32 participants for 20 min. each level. There was a significant change in forearm skin temperature at all risk levels (p < 0.001), with a positive linear correlation (r = 0.658 and p < 0.001), which led the authors to perform linear regression analysis for the forearm region. The Predicted OCRA Index calculation equation was successfully developed (R = 0.767 and R² = 0.588), while using as independent variables: air temperature and temperature variation of the forearm skin. The Predicted OCRA Index can be applied as a screening tool for large numbers of workers in the same company or sector, due to its speed of application and the determination of risk level, but it does not replace the original OCRA Index.


2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.F. Ehrlich ◽  
G. Vedulla ◽  
N. Cottrell ◽  
P.A. Seidman

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada ◽  
Marcos R. Kunzler ◽  
Emmanuel S. da Rocha ◽  
Álvaro S. Machado ◽  
Felipe P. Carpes

AbstractPurpose. Increased contact pressure and skin friction may lead to higher skin temperature. Here, we hypothesized a relationship between plantar pressure and foot temperature. To elicit different conditions of stress to the foot, participants performed running trials of barefoot and shod running. Methods. Eighteen male recreational runners ran shod and barefoot at a self-selected speed for 15 min over different days. Before and immediately after running, plantar pressure during standing (via a pressure mapping system) and skin temperature (using thermography) were recorded. Results. No significant changes were found in plantar pressure after barefoot or shod conditions (p > 0.9). Shod running elicited higher temperatures in the forefoot (by 0.5-2.2°C or 0.1-1.2% compared with the whole foot, p < 0.01) and midfoot (by 0.9-2.4°C, p < 0.01). Barefoot running resulted in higher temperature variation in the rearfoot (0.1-10.4%, p = 0.04). Correlations between skin temperature and plantar pressure were not significant (r < 0.5 and r > -0.5, p > 0.05). Conclusions. The increase in temperature after the shod condition was most likely the result of footwear insulation. However, variation of the temperature in the rearfoot was higher after barefoot running, possible due to a higher contact load. Changes in temperature could not predict changes in plantar pressure and vice-versa.


1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiko Ikeda ◽  
Daniel I. Sessler ◽  
Danielle Marder ◽  
Junyu Xiong

Background Recently, liquid crystal skin-surface thermometers have become popular for intraoperative temperature monitoring. Three situations during which cutaneous liquid-crystal thermometry may poorly estimate core temperature were monitored: (1) anesthetic induction with consequent core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat, (2) thermoregulatory vasomotion associated with sweating (precapillary dilation) and shivering (minimal capillary flow), and (3) ambient temperature variation over the clinical range from 18-26 degrees C. Methods The core-to-forehead and core-to-neck temperature difference was measured using liquid-crystal thermometers having an approximately 2 degrees C offset. Differences exceeding 0.5 degree C (a 1 degree C) temperature range) were a priori deemed potentially clinically important. Seven volunteers participated in each protocol. First, core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat was produced by inducing propofol/desflurane anesthesia; anesthesia was then maintained for 1 h with desflurane. Second, vasodilation was produced by warming unanesthetized volunteers sufficiently to produce sweating; intense vasoconstriction was similarly produced by cooling the volunteers sufficiently to produce shivering. Third, a canopy was positioned to enclose the head, neck, and upper chest of unanesthetized volunteers. Air within the canopy was randomly set to 18, 20, 22, 24, and 26 degrees C. Results Redistribution of body heat accompanying induction of anesthesia had little effect on the core-to-forehead skin temperature difference. However, the core-to-neck skin temperature gradient decreased approximately 0.6 degree C in the hour after induction of anesthesia. Vasomotion associated with shivering and mild sweating altered the core-to-skin temperature difference only a few tenths of a degree centigrade. The absolute value of the core-to-forehead temperature difference exceeded 0.5 degree C during approximately 35% of the measurements, but the difference rarely exceeded 1 degree C. The core-to-neck temperature difference typically exceeded 0.5 degree C and frequently exceeded 1 degree C. Each 1 degree C increase in ambient temperature decreased the core-to-fore-head and core-to-neck skin temperature differences by less than 0.2 degree C. Conclusions Forehead skin temperatures were better than neck skin temperature at estimating core temperature. Core-to-neck temperature differences frequently exceeded 1 degree C (a 2 degrees C range), whereas two thirds of the core-to-forehead differences were within 0.5 degree C. The core-to-skin temperature differences were, however, only slightly altered by inducing anesthesia, vasomotor action, and typical intraoperative changes in ambient temperature.


1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hallan ◽  
C. Lange ◽  
A. Åsberg

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Borba Neves ◽  
Tiago Rafael Moreira ◽  
Rui Jorge Lemos ◽  
José Vilaça-Alves ◽  
Claudio Rosa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document