Prophylactic antibiotics in patients with artificial rupture of membranes during labor: (Randomized controlled clinical trial)

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Hassan Swidan ◽  
Wessam Magdy Abuelghar ◽  
Mohamed Adel Ali ◽  
Mohamed Soliman Hussein Soliman

Abstract Background Amniotomy, also known as artificial rupture of membranes (AROMs) and by the lay description "breaking the water," is the intentional rupture of the amniotic sac by an obstetrical provider. This procedure is common during labor management and has been performed by obstetrical providers for at least a few hundred years. Amniotomy during labor induction is associated with a faster time to delivery, most notably in nulliparous women, without an increase in cesarean delivery or maternal and neonatal morbidity. Shortening time to delivery is associated with decreased hospital costs and increased patient satisfaction, and therefore, early amniotomy, given the safety profile, should be considered when a faster delivery is of importance to patients and providers. Objective To determine the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in patient during labor on reducing maternal and neonatal morbidities. Methods This prospective randomized study was performed from January 2020 to July 2020, at maternity hospital of Ain Shams University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Candidates for this study included all patients with singleton gestations between 37 weeks and 41 weeks of gestation underwent artificial rupture of the membranes during active phase of labor. Gestational age was confirmed by a reliable last menstrual period, early sonogram. Amniotomy was confirmed by visualization of pooling fluid in the posterior vaginal fornix through the cervix after artificial rupture of membrane by sterile hook. Results There were no statistical significance differences between two groups regarding demographic characteristics, endometritis, cord-prolapse and abruptio placenta. Maternal septicemia was absent in both groups. Chorio-amnionitis, cesarean section rate, episiotomy infection, NICU admission, neonatal sepsis, neonatal hypoxia and intraventricular hemorrhage were significantly less frequent in prophylaxis group. Conclusion Using of prophylactic antibiotics with amniotomy in pregnant women during labor reduced maternal and neonatal morbidities as chorio-amnionitis, endometritis, cesarean section rate, episiotomy infection, NICU admission, neonatal sepsis, neonatal hypoxia and intraventricular hemorrhage. On the other side it had no proved protective effect against maternal septicemia, cord-prolapse and abruptio placenta.

Author(s):  
Manisha Gupta ◽  
Punit Gupta

Background: FHR monitoring plays the most important role in management of labouring patient when incidence of fetal hypoxia and progressive asphyxia increases. Now a day’s cardiotocography (CTG) become a popular method for monitoring of fetal wellbeing and it is assisting the obstetrician in making the decision on the mode of delivery to improve perinatal outcome. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of cardiotocography on perinatal outcome and its correlation with caesarean section rate.Methods: In this prospective observational study 201 gravid women with high risk pregnancy in first stage of labour were taken. Result was assessed in the form of Apgar score at five minute, NICU admission, perinatal mortality and mode of delivery. Statistical analysis is done by using Chi square test and p<0.05 is considered as statistically significant.Results: Perinatal morbidity in the form of NICU admission is higher in nonreactive group as compare to reactive group (75.7% v/s 22.8%). Cesarean section rate for fetal distress were higher in nonreactive group (87.8%) in comparison to reactive group (20.5%). So this study suggest that there is significant difference in mode of delivery with increasing chances of caesarean section in cases belong to non-reactive traces (p<0.001).Conclusions: Admission test is non-invasive and the best screening test to evaluate the fetal health and to predict the perinatal outcome but it also associated with increase caesarean section rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Bhattarai ◽  
Rajiv Shah ◽  
Sita Dhakal ◽  
Pragya Malla ◽  
Srijana Sapkota

Background: General anesthesia for cesarean section is being less popular for cesarean section in present days but sometime general anesthesia is inevitable. The aim of the study is to assess the trends of general anesthesia, indications, clinical outcome in mother and fetus in high altitude setting of tertiary care center of Nepal. Methods: We conducted descriptive cross-sectional study all cases of cesarean section in Karnali Academy of health Sciences (KAHS) located at high altitude over three years period   in our institute. Data were retrieved from the hospital records during three fiscal year (Jan 1st 2017 to Jan Dec 31st 2019). The record of all the patients who underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia was reviewed for demographic details, indication of general anesthesia, trends for general and spinal anesthesia and maternal and neonatal outcome. Results: Out of total deliveries 2175, 309 (14.2%) cases account for cesarean section. Among them, 52 (17%) required general anesthesia . Eclampsia 19(36%) remain the major indication for General Anesthesia in cesarean section followed by failure of spinal anesthesia number 14 (26%) , cord prolapse six (12%), antepartam haemorrhage five (10%), spinal site infection four (8%), Khiphoscoliosis two(4%), Patients request  two (4%). Use for general anesthesia technique was consistent for three years with slow rise in use of spinal anesthesia . There was no any anesthesia related maternal mortality and nine intraoperative neonatal   Conclusions:  General anesthesia practices are consistently required in rural high-altitude setup. Eclampsia is the commonest indication followed by failure of spinal anesthesia and cord prolapse. Neonatal outcome is still not good.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Ljustina ◽  
Ivana Berisavac ◽  
Milica Berisavac ◽  
Ljudmila Kovacevic-Vukolic ◽  
Vesna Velickovic-Aleksic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality. Periventricular hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage (PVH-IVH) remains a significant cause of both morbidity and mortality in infants prematurely born. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perinatal outcome regarding IVH of premature babies according to the mode of delivery. Methods. A total of 126 women in preterm singleton pregnancies with vertex presentation and 126 neonates weighted from 750 g to 1,500 g at birth were enrolled. The outcomes of 64 neonates born vaginally were compared to 62 neonates born by cesarean section. Results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IVH among both groups. Conclusion. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that the mode of delivery does not influence IVH and consenquently perinatal outcome in preterm neonates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Kehl ◽  
Christel Weiss ◽  
Jutta Pretscher ◽  
Friederike Baier ◽  
Florian Faschingbauer ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To assess the frequency of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in cases with shortened cervical length by addition of placental alpha-microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) testing to sonographic examination. Methods Single centre retrospective cohort study. Rate of ACS administration was compared between cases with cervical length between 15 and 25 mm and cases with positive PAMG-1 testing and cervical length between 15 and 25 mm. We evaluated the following outcome parameters: Rate of ACS administration, gestational age at delivery, time to delivery, delivery within seven days, delivery <34 and <37 weeks’ gestation, rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Results In total, 130 cases were included. “PAMG-1 group” consisted of 68 women, 62 cases built the “historical control group”. ACS administration was performed less frequently in the “PAMG-1 cohort” (18 (26%) vs. 46 (74%); p<0.001). The rate of delivery within seven days did not differ (2 (3%) vs. 4 (6.5%); p=0.4239). The rates of delivery <34 weeks’ gestation (7 (10%) vs. 9 (15%); p=0.4643) and <37 weeks’ gestation (19 (28%) vs. 26 (42%); p=0.0939) did not differ. Time to delivery interval was longer in the PAMG-1 group (61.5 vs. 43 days, p=0.0117). NICU admission occurred more often in the “historical control group” (22 (38%) vs. 28 (60%); p=0.0272). Conclusions Addition of biomarker testing can help to avoid unnecessary ACS administrations in women with shortened cervical length.


JAMA ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 264 (8) ◽  
pp. 971 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Pascoe

Author(s):  
Saloni K. Gandhi ◽  
Ayushi P. Vamja ◽  
Kishor P. Chauhan

Background: Antepartum hemorrhage (APH) is defined as any bleeding from or into the genital tract after the period of viability and before the delivery of the baby. Aim of the research was to study the fetomaternal outcome in patients with APH.Methods: The present study was a retrospective observational study undertaken in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Dhiraj General Hospital, during a period of 1.5 years from November 2018 to May 2020 in 84 cases of antepartum hemorrhage. Only patients with APH >28 weeks gestational age and willing to participate in study were included. Open STAT statistical software has been used to analyse the data in this study.Results: The incidence of antepartum hemorrhage was 2.86%. Maximum patients of APH lie between the age group of 26-34 years. In abruptio placenta (AP) 65% and in placenta previa (PP) 77.2% of the patients were multiparous. APH presents mostly between 34-36 weeks. Around 90% patients of APH required blood transfusion. APH overall shows increased rate of cesarean sections upto 62%. Around 9.5% patients went into shock, 4.7% had disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 3.5% postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and 8.3% had wound gap and peurperial pyrexia. 23.8% babies had asphyxia of which 60% were contributed to PP and 40% were in AP group. Respiratory distress syndrome was in 7.1% babies of which both groups equally contributed. Septicemia was seen in 13% and jaundice in 29.8%.Conclusions: Higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and stay were seen with these complications. This study showed 20.2% perinatal deaths as outcome of APH and 14.2% still births. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-209
Author(s):  
Zeynep Gedik Özköse ◽  
Süleyman Cemil Oğlak

Objective This study aimed to determine the effect of advanced maternal age (AMA) on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women aged ≥35 years compared with patients aged 30–34 years. Also, we aimed to analyze the risk estimates of potential confounders to identify whether these variables contributed to the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes or not. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 2284 pregnant women aged ≥35 years at the time of delivery who was delivered in a tertiary referral hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. We further classified these women into two subgroups: 35–39 years as early AMA (EAMA), and ≥40 years as very AMA (VAMA). Pregnancy complications and adverse neonatal outcomes were recorded. Results Compared to younger women, pregnant AMA women had significantly higher risks of complicated pregnancies, including a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, p<0.001), polyhydramnios (p<0.001), cesarean section (p<0.001), stillbirths (p<0.001), major fetal abnormality (p<0.001), preterm delivery (p<0.001), lower birth weight (p<0.001), lower 5-minute Apgar scores (p<0.001), lower umbilical artery blood pH values (p<0.001), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (p<0.001), and length of NICU stay (p<0.001). Conclusion We found a strong and significant association between VAMA and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including an increased risk of GDM, polyhydramnios, cesarean section, and adverse neonatal outcomes, including a higher risk of stillbirths, preterm delivery, lower birth weight, lower 5-minute Apgar scores, and NICU admission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document