Short-termism, Managerial Talent, and Firm Value

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T Thakor
Keyword(s):  
Labor Market ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Rent Seeking ◽  
Investment Horizon ◽  
Managerial Talent ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Short Termism ◽  
Is Value

Abstract This paper examines how the firm’s choice of investment horizon interacts with rent-seeking by privately informed, multitasking managers and the labor market. Two main results surface. First, managers prefer longer-horizon projects that permit them to extract higher rents from firms, so short-termism involves lower agency costs and is value maximizing for some firms. Second, when firms compete for managers, firms practicing short-termism attract better managerial talent when talent is unobservable, but larger firms that invest in long-horizon projects hire more talented managers when talent is revealed. (JEL D82, D86, G31, G32, J41) Received July 25, 2019; editorial decision July 7, 2020 by Editor Uday Rajan.

Rent-seeking and firm value: Chinese evidence

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihai Li ◽  
Huiying Wu ◽  
Xinfeng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Corporate Philanthropy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Rent Seeking ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Weak Institutions ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
The Government

AbstractWe examine whether engagement in rent-seeking improves firm value in China. Rent-seeking is defined as a firm's use of resources to establish a relationship with the government to obtain government-controlled resources. We incorporate political rents and associated costs into an analytical framework to examine the relationship between rent-seeking and firm value. Using a sample of non-state-owned firms listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and the Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2013, we find evidence of the presence of political rents in the form of government subsidies and evidence of associated costs in the forms of corporate philanthropy and excess management remuneration, which largely explains the insignificant relationship found between rent-seeking and firm value. Our further analysis shows that rent-seeking behavior of firms reduces production efficiency, providing additional evidence to support our thesis that engagement in rent-seeking does not enhance firm value in the Chinese context. In an economy with weak institutions, in particular with weak protection for shareholders, managers and politicians can become rent-seekers and take a considerable share of the economic benefits derived from rent-seeking.

scholarly journals KETERKAITAN MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP DAN LEVERAGE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN: DALAM KONTEK HUBUNGAN KEAGENAN PERUSAHAAN DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Margarita Ekadjaja ◽  
Rorlen Rorlen ◽  
Fanny Andriani Setiawan ◽  
Kartika Nuringsih
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Positive Interaction ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
The Relationship

Manajemen dan nilai perusahaan memiliki keterkaitan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan.  Dimana manajemen perusahaan merupakan penggerak roda perusahaan dan berorientasi pada nilai perusahaan. Peran seorang manajer adalah memaksimalkan kekayaan bagi pemegang saham.  Namun, manajer yang tidak memiliki kepemilikan saham yang signifikan di perusahaan dapat memilih untuk memaksimalkan keuntungan bersih mereka sendiri dengan mengorbankan pemilik perusahaan. Akibatnya, pemilik terpaksa mengeluarkan biaya agensi untuk memastikan bahwa manajemen perusahaan bertindak dengan cara yang tepat. Cara untuk mengurangi biaya agensi adalah memaksa perusahaan untuk meningkatkan hutang. Tujuan penelitian adalah  menguji hubungan simultan pertukaran antara ownership, leverage, dan nilai perusahaan sehubungan dengan keagenan pada perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia dari tahun 2012-2018. Penelitian ini menambah pemahaman mengenai keterkaitan antara ownership dengan leverage, dan nilai perusahaan. Analisis data untuk argumen tentang keterkaitan simultan antara  ownership, leverage, dan nilai perusahaan melalui data panel regresi berganda 2 SLS (Two Stage Least Square). Bidang penelitian ini diperluas dengan mempertimbangkan model empiris di mana ownership dan leverage masing-masing diperlakukan sebagai variabel endogen atau ditentukan bersama.  Dalam metode 2 SLS ada 2 kali variabel yang diobservasi secara simultan untuk menghindari bayes sehingga variabel tersebut tidak bias, di mana variabel managerial ownership dan Leverage merupakan determinan non linier nilai perusahaan sebagai bagian integral dari pengambilan keputusan perusahaan dalam kerangka keagenan.  Persamaan Regresi hasil uji 2SLS memunjukkan keterkaitan nilai perusahaan dengan managerial ownership dan leverage. Hasil menunjukkan interaksi positif  tidak signifikan antara managerial ownerhip dengan nilai perusahaan, interaksi positif signifikan antara nilai perusahaan dengan leverage, dan interaksi yang negatif signifkan antara managerial ownership dengan leverage. Management and corporate value have an inseparable relationship. Where the company management is the driving force of the company and oriented to corporate values. The role of a manager is to maximize wealth of shareholders. However, managers who do not have a significant share in the company may choose to maximize their own net profits at the expense of the company owners. As a result, the owners are forced to incur agency costs to ensure that company management acts in an appropriate manner. The way to reduce agency costs is to force the company to increase debt. The research objective is to examine the exchange simultaneous relationship between ownership, leverage, and corporate value with respect to agency in manufacturing companies in Indonesia from 2012-2018. This study adds to the understanding of the relationship between ownership and leverage, and corporate value. Data analysis for arguments about the simultaneous relationship between ownership, leverage, and firm value through 2 SLS (Two Stage Least Square) multiple regression panel data. This field of research is extended by considering empirical models in which ownership and leverage are treated as endogenous or co-determined variables, respectively. Ownership and Leverage as an integral part of corporate decision making within an agency framework, which in turn will affect the value of the company. In the SLS 2 method, there are 2 variables that are observed simultaneously to avoid bayes so that the variable is not biased, in which the managerial ownership and leverage variables are nonlinear determinant corporate value as an integral part of corporate decision making within the agency framework, which in turn will affect firm value. The 2SLS regression equation results show the relationship between firm value and managerial ownership and leverage. The results prove that there is a positive interaction between managerial ownership between firm value, a significant positive interaction between firm value and leverage, and a significant negative interaction between managerial ownership and leverage.

scholarly journals Agency Costs, Corporate Governance and the Nature of Controlling Shareholders: Evidence From French Listed Firms

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dabboussi Moez
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Investment Horizon ◽  
Agency Conflicts ◽  
Controlling Shareholders ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Indirect Benefits ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the impact of internal corporate governance on agency costs for French firms from 2000 to 2015. Our results reveal that shareholders themselves are not a homogenous group since they have no single common investment horizon. We found that managerial ownership is more effective in mitigating operational expenses. However, they take advantage of excessive spending on indirect benefits. We show that board of directors does not serve as a significant deterrent to excessive discretionary expenses. Finally, we found that dividend policy is a useful tool to reduce agency conflicts by reducing cash that is available for discretionary uses.

Initial Coin Offerings, Speculation, and Asset Tokenization

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingxing (Rowena) Gan ◽  
Gerry Tsoukalas ◽  
Serguei Netessine
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Operations Management ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Demand Uncertainty ◽  
Customer Demand ◽  
Demand Characteristics ◽  
Operating Strategy ◽  
Mean Variance ◽  
Initial Coin Offerings

Initial coin offerings (ICOs) are an emerging form of fundraising for blockchain-based startups. We examine how ICOs can be leveraged in the context of asset tokenization, whereby firms issue tokens backed by future assets (i.e., inventory) to finance growth. We (i) make suggestions on how to design such “asset-backed” ICOs—including optimal token floating and pricing for both utility and equity tokens (a.k.a. security token offerings)—taking into account moral hazard (cash diversion), product characteristics, and customer demand uncertainty; (ii) make predictions on ICO success/failure; and (iii) discuss implications on firm operating strategy. We show that in unregulated environments, ICOs can lead to significant agency costs, underproduction, and loss of firm value. These inefficiencies, however, fade as product margins and demand characteristics (mean/variance) improve, and they are less severe under equity (rather than utility) token issuance. Importantly, the advantage of equity tokens stems from their inherent ability to better align incentives and thus continues to hold even absent regulation. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.

Kelly Solar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Samuel E. Bodily ◽  
Marc L. Lipson ◽  
Kenneth C. Lichtendahl
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Debt Overhang ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Outstanding Debt ◽  
Agency Costs Of Debt

A small start-up company must make additional investments to maximize its firm value. But the company owner will not make this investment unless she can renegotiate outstanding debt claims. Solving this “debt overhang” problem through negotiation is the focus of the case. In this context, students are exposed to a variety of issues: the nature of financial claims, bargaining and negotiation fundamentals, and agency costs of debt.

The Agency Cost Effects of Unionization on Firm Value

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vic Naiker ◽  
Farshid Navissi ◽  
VG Sridharan
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Agency Cost ◽  
Labor Intensity ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Industry Membership

ABSTRACT: Using a sample of 99 New Zealand stock-exchange-listed firms we employ agency framework and strategy typology to examine whether introduction of unionization legislation affects value of prospector firms more negatively than defender firms. The results from this examination indicate that firms characterized by strategy of higher Growth-Diversity and Innovation-Risk (prospector firms) experience greater loss in value. We attribute the results to the higher agency costs associated with the strategies adopted by prospector firms. The results hold after controlling for variables such as size, industry membership, labor intensity, and proportion of unionized workers.

scholarly journals Fighting Fire with Fire: Optimality of Value Destruction to Mitigate Short-Termism

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Aycan Corum
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Endogenous Entry ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Termism

I study a model of short-termism where a firm's value is affected by the actions of an agent, who can represent the manager or the board, as well as an entrepreneur, venture capital, private equity, or activist shareholder. The agent either has a project with positive NPV and can further increase the NPV by exerting effort, or has a project that destroys value. The agent has a stake in the company and can liquidate it before the NPV of his actions is realized by the market. This ability to exit creates short-term incentives for the agent to not exert effort, as well as opportunities for him to profit even if he is destroying value. I find that replacing a fraction of agents that have positive NPV projects with value-destroying agents can increase average firm value, because it motivates the value-creating agents to work harder and this effect can dominate the added value destruction. Moreover, this result also holds under endogenous entry of agents: Reducing the entry or operating costs for the agents can increase average firm value and gross value destruction simultaneously, even though the fraction of agents with positive NPV projects decreases. Therefore, regulations that aim mitigating short-termism by curbing value destruction can actually yield opposite results and reduce average firm value instead.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document