scholarly journals Interstitial lung disease has a poor prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis: results from an inception cohort

Rheumatology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1483-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Koduri ◽  
S. Norton ◽  
A. Young ◽  
N. Cox ◽  
P. Davies ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 600.2-600
Author(s):  
C. Aguilera Cros ◽  
M. Gomez Vargas ◽  
R. J. Gil Velez ◽  
J. A. Rodriguez Portal

Background:Among the risk factors associated with the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are: male sex, old age, erosive RA, rheumatoid nodules, smoking and high levels of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA). The factors of poor prognosis include: HRCT (High Resolution Computed Tomography) pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (NIU) with altered baseline functional tests (forced vital capacity FVC <60%, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide DLCO<40%).RA associated UIP (RA-UIP) has an appearance that is identical to idiopathic UIP (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF]) on HRCT.Objectives:To analyze different risk factors and poor prognosis in a cohort of patients with ILD-RA.To assess the degree of association between tobacco (smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers) and altered baseline functional respiratory tests (FRT) (FVC <80% and DLCO <40%) with HRCT patterns.Methods:Descriptive study of 57 patients treated in our Hospital (1/1/2018 until 12/31/2019) with a diagnosis of RA (ACR 2010 criteria) and secondary ILD.The most recent American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Society (ALAT) guidelines define three HRCT (High Resolution Computed Tomography) patterns of fibrosing lung disease in the setting of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): definite UIP (traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing), possible UIP and inconsistent with UIP. The distinction between definite UIP and possible UIP in these to the presence or absence of honeycombing. Approved by the Ethics Committee.Quantitative variables are expressed as mean (SD) and dichotomous variables as percentages (%). The association between tobacco-UIP and FVC-UIP was studied using two Chi-square tests and the DLCO-UIP relationship with an exact Fisher test. Statistical analysis with SPSS version 21.Results:21 men and 36 women were included, with a mean age of 69 ± 10 years (mean ± SD), history of smoking (smokers 14%, non-smokers 43%, ex-smokers 42%). 83% were positive RF and 70% positive ACPA. Regarding the HRCT findings: 29 (50%) had a inconsistent with UIP pattern and 28 (49%) had an UIP pattern (45% defined, 3% possible). Of the UIP patients, 14 (50%) had a smoking relationship (35% ex-smokers, 25% smokers) and 15 were male (53%). Of the sample analyzed, 8% (5 patients) have died, all ex-smoking men, the UIP pattern being the most frequent found (4 UIP, 1 inconsistent with UIP).No statistical association was observed between patients with exposure to tobacco and the UIP pattern (p = 0.438), nor among patients with baseline FVC <80% and UIP (p = 0.432) and also among patients with baseline DLCO <40% and UIP pattern (p = 0.459).Conclusion:Our results, in general, do not match what is published in the literature. Male sex, smoking exposure and fibrosing pattern (UIP) represent a worse prognosis for patients with ILD-RA. However, more studies are required to determine more precisely how these risk factors affect the disease.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Author(s):  
Charlotte Hyldgaard ◽  
Mette Axelsen ◽  
Frank Andersen ◽  
Trine Bay Laurberg ◽  
Jesper Blegvad ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Ae Yang ◽  
Jeong Seok Lee ◽  
Jin Kyun Park ◽  
Eun Bong Lee ◽  
Yeong Wook Song ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2110225
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Furukawa ◽  
Shomi Oka ◽  
Takashi Higuchi ◽  
Kota Shimada ◽  
Atsushi Hashimoto ◽  
...  

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently a complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as an extra-articular manifestation which has a poor prognosis. Acute-onset diffuse ILD (AoDILD) occasionally occurs in RA and includes acute exacerbation of ILD, drug-induced ILD, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. AoDILD also confers a poor prognosis in RA. Previously-established biomarkers for ILD include Krebs von den lungen-6 and surfactant protein-D originally defined in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; the sensitivity of these markers for RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) is low. Although many studies on ILD markers have been performed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, only a few validation studies in RA-ILD or AoDILD have been reported. Biomarkers for RA-ILD and AoDILD are thus still required. Recently, genomic, cytokine, antibody, and metabolomic profiles of RA-ILD or AoDILD have been investigated with the aim of improving biomarkers. In this review, we summarize current preliminary data on these potential biomarkers for RA-ILD or AoDILD. The development of biomarkers on RA-ILD has only just begun. When validated, such candidate biomarkers will provide valuable information on pathogenesis, prognosis, and drug responses in RA-ILD in future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
Khalida El-Refaei ◽  
Hend Maghraby ◽  
Hala Keshk ◽  
Bahera Fath Allah ◽  
Hala Maghraby

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
B. Samhouri ◽  
R. Vassallo ◽  
S. Achenbach ◽  
V. Kronzer ◽  
J. M. Davis ◽  
...  

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease of the joints and other organs, including the lungs.1 Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a lung injury pattern associated with significant symptom burden and poor outcomes in RA.2 Better understanding of its risk factors could help with disease prevention and treatment.Objectives:Using a population-based cohort, we sought to ascertain the incidence and risk factors of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) in recent years.Methods:The study included adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with incident RA between 1999 and 2014 based on the 1987 ACR classification criteria.3 Study subjects were followed until death, migration, or 4/30/2019. ILD was defined by the presence of bilateral interstitial fibrotic changes (excluding biapical scarring) on chest computed tomography (CT). In the absence of chest CT imaging, a physician’s diagnosis of ILD in conjunction with chest X-ray findings suggestive of ILD and a restrictive pattern on pulmonary function testing (defined as a total lung capacity less than the lower limit of normal) was considered diagnostic of ILD. Evaluated risk factors included age, sex, calendar year, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and presence/absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Cumulative incidence of ILD was adjusted for the competing risk of death. Cox models were used to assess the association between potential risk factors and the development of RA-ILD.Results:In Olmsted County, 645 residents were diagnosed with RA between 1999 and 2014. Seventy percent of patients were females, and 30% were males; median age at RA diagnosis was 55.3 [IQR 44.1-66.6] years, and most patients (89%) were white. Fifty-three percent of patients were never-smokers, and 64% had seropositive RA. Forty percent were obese (i.e., BMI ≥30 kg/m2); median BMI was 28.3 [IQR 24.3-33.0] kg/m2.In the cohort, ILD was identified in 73 patients. The ILD diagnosis predated RA diagnosis in 22 patients (3.4%) who were excluded from subsequent analyses. Final analyses included the remaining 623 patients with no ILD preceding, or at the time of RA diagnosis. Over a median follow-up interval of 10.2 [IQR 6.5-14.3] years, 51 patients developed ILD. Cumulative incidence of ILD, adjusted for the competing risk of death, was 4.3% at 5 years; 7.8% at 10 years; 9.4% at 15 years; and 12.3% at 20 years after RA diagnosis (Figure 1).Age, and history of smoking at RA diagnosis correlated with the incidence of ILD; adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.89 per 10-year increase in age (95% confidence interval 1.52-2.34) and 1.94 (95% confidence interval 1.10-3.42), respectively. On the other hand, sex (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.68-2.17), BMI (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.04), obesity (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.50-1.58), and seropositivity (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.65-2.03) did not demonstrate significant associations with ILD.Conclusion:This study provides a contemporary estimate of the occurrence of ILD in a well-characterized population-based cohort of patients with RA. Our findings of a lack of association between sex, obesity and seropositivity with ILD may indicate a change in established risk factors for ILD and warrant further investigation.References:[1]Shaw M, Collins BF, Ho LA, Raghu G. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24(135):1-16. doi:10.1183/09059180.00008014[2]Bongartz T, Nannini C, Medina-Velasquez YF, et al. Incidence and mortality of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis - A population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(6):1583-1591. doi:10.1002/art.27405[3]Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569-2581. doi:10.1002/art.27584Figure 1.Cumulative incidence of ILD in patients diagnosed with RA between 1999 and 2014, adjusted for the competing risk of death. Abbreviations. ILD: interstitial lung disease; RA: rheumatoid arthritis.Disclosure of Interests:Bilal Samhouri: None declared, Robert Vassallo Grant/research support from: Research grants from Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb, Sara Achenbach: None declared, Vanessa Kronzer: None declared, John M Davis III Grant/research support from: Research grant from Pfizer., Elena Myasoedova: None declared, Cynthia S. Crowson: None declared


Author(s):  
Marika Tardella ◽  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Andrea Giovagnoni ◽  
Fausto Salaffi

Abstract Introduction Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) is an extra-articular involvement that impairs the prognosis and for which there is still no well-coded treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate abatacept (ABA) effectiveness and safety in patients with RA-ILD. Methods RA-ILD patients who started ABA treatment were consecutively enrolled. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), clinical, laboratory and respiratory function variables were collected at baseline and after 18 months of ABA treatment. HRCT abnormalities were evaluated using a computer-aided method (CaM). ABA response was established based on the change in the percentage of fibrosis evaluated at HRCT-CaM, dividing patients into “worsened” (progression ≥ 15%), “improved” (reduction ≥ 15%), and “stable” (changes within the 15% range). The multivariate regression model was used to assess the associations between RA characteristics and ABA response. Results Forty-four patients (81% women, mean age 59.1 ± 8.0, mean disease duration of 7.5 ± 3.1 years) were studied. Five patients (11.4%) showed RA-ILD progression, 32 patients (72.6%) were considered stable, and 7 patients (16.0%) showed an RA-ILD improvement. The proportion of current smokers was significantly different between “worsened” patients, respect to those defined as "improved/stable” (p = 0.01). Current smoking habit (p = 0.005) and concomitant methotrexate treatment (p = 0.0078) were the two variables related to RA-ILD progression in multivariate regression analysis. Conclusion Treatment with ABA is associated with a RA-ILD stability or improvement in the 88.6% of patients. Current smoking habit and concomitant treatment with methotrexate are the modifiable factors associated with RA-ILD worsening. Key Points• Abatacept plays a favourable role in the control of RA-ILD, with a significant worsening in only 11.4% of patients during a 18-month follow-up period.• The predictive variables related to RA-ILD progression during abatacept therapy are the concomitant treatment with methotrexate and current smoking habit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1143.2-1144
Author(s):  
J. Antony ◽  
R. Sankaralingam ◽  
R. Maheshwari ◽  
B. Chilukuri ◽  
S. Chinnadurai

Background:Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20. There is a paucity of studies done with RTX biosimilars. This is a Retrospective and Observational study from January 2018 to December 2019 done in the Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.Objectives:1.To find the effects of varying doses of RTX in attaining clinical remission in RA.2.To find if CD19, CD20 & IgG help in identifying impending flare & if these levels help in deciding the timing of the next dose of RTX.Methods:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases who were given Rituximab from January 2018 were selected. Clinical Response at 6 & 12 months & wherever feasible at 18 & 24 months was assessed by Simplified Disease Activity index (SDAI). RTX initial dose was given at 0 and 14 days followed by fixed dose at six months interval.CD19, CD20 B cell count, IgG levels were tested in patients in whom it was feasible at baseline & 6 months (select patients at 12,18 &24 months). Patients were divided in to 5 groups (DMARD naïve, DMARD resistant & Interstitial Lung disease (ILD) [Lung involvement>20% in Computed Tomography (CT)]) and (500mg & 1g). Patients were divided into three clinical groups, (DMARD naïve, DMARD resistant & Interstitial Lung disease (ILD) [Lung involvement>20% in Computed Tomography (CT)]) and two treatment groups (500mg & 1g) based on clinical indication for RTX and dose of RTX, respectively. In patients with ILD, CT scan & FVC were compared at baseline & 12 months.Results:29 patients (seropositive 28 (RF/Anti CCP/BOTH+VE), seronegative 1) were given RTX for RA over a 2-year period of which 12 had CD19, CD20 & IgG tested. Mean SDAI reduction from baseline to 6 months post treatment was 30%, 32% & 14% while complete remission (SDAI<3.3) was attained in 100%, 18% & 20% in DMARD naïve, DMARD resistant & ILD groups, respectively. CD19, CD20 & IgG reduced from 18.6%, 18.4% & 18.53g/L to 3.7%,3.7% & 9.7g/L respectively FVC improved from 62.4% to 67% at 12. The percentage of patients with lung involvement >20% reduced from 53.3% to 46.7%. Flare was observed in one patient who received 500mg RTX. CD19, CD20 & IgG levels increased from 7.9%, 8% & 9.8g/L to 27%, 25% & 13g/L respectively. 3 patients in the 1g group were followed up at 12,18 & 24 months. In these patients there were no flares or worsening symptoms. 1 patient was double negative for RF & Anti CCP and this patient did not attain clinical remission even after 2 doses of 1g RTX.Conclusion:[1]Patients with early arthritis (diagnosis made within 1 year) and who were DMARD naïve had an excellent response to Rituximab.[2]Complete remission was observed in more patients the 1g compared to 500mg group.[3]Reduction in CD19 & CD20 was associated with significant reduction in the SDAI score.[4]There was no significant reduction of CD19 & CD20 with 500mg dose of Rituximab where either a partial remission or mild flare was observed.[5]There was reduction in the lung involvement to less than 20%(CT) in few patients with 1g dose.[6]Double negative Rheumatoid arthritis poorly responded to Rituximab.[7]The positive effects of 1g Rituximab could be noted up to 24 months.[8]Flare of RA was associated with significant increase in CD19 & CD20.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document