Root growth and water use efficiency of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) seedlings

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Smit ◽  
R. van den Driessche
Keyword(s):  
Root Growth ◽  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Pseudotsuga Menziesii ◽  
Pinus Contorta ◽  
Lodgepole Pine ◽  
Douglas Fir ◽  
Use Efficiency

Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in different-aged Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir stands

2009 ◽  
Vol 149 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1168-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachhpal S. Jassal ◽  
T. Andrew Black ◽  
David L. Spittlehouse ◽  
Christian Brümmer ◽  
Zoran Nesic
Keyword(s):  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Douglas Fir ◽  
Use Efficiency

PINE OIL PROTECTS LIVING TREES FROM ATTACK BY THREE BARK BEETLE SPECIES, DENDROCTONUS SPP. (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

1981 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Nijholt ◽  
L. H. McMullen ◽  
L. Safranyik
Keyword(s):  
Pseudotsuga Menziesii ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Pinus Contorta ◽  
Mountain Pine Beetle ◽  
Lodgepole Pine ◽  
Douglas Fir ◽  
Dendroctonus Pseudotsugae ◽  
Pine Oil ◽  
Spruce Beetle ◽  
Pine Beetle

AbstractPine oil, a by-product of sulphate wood pulping, protected pheromone-baited, living Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.), and spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss - P. engelmannii Parry hybrids) from attack by Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk.), mountain pine beetle (D. ponderosa Hopk.), and spruce beetle (D. rufipennis (Kirby)), respectively. Pine oil also protected surrounding trees and reduced attack incidence on Douglas-fir, lodgepole pine, and spruce within at least a 10 m radius. α-Terpineol, one of the constituents of the pine oil mixture, was less effective.

Microhabitat comparisons of transpiration and photosynthesis in three subalpine conifers

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Carter ◽  
William K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Pinus Contorta ◽  
Photosynthetic Performance ◽  
Leaf Conductance ◽  
Forest Understory ◽  
Subalpine Forest ◽  
Abies Lasiocarpa ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Central Rocky Mountains

Differences in water and photosynthetic relations were compared for three codominant conifers (Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmaniï), subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) at microhabitats within a subalpine forest (central Rocky Mountains, U.S.A.) that were considered representative of different successional stages. Diumal measurements of photosynthesis, leaf conductance, and transpiration were taken at microhabitats considered early-successional (open), intermediate (forest gap), and late-successional (forest understory) environments to evaluate possible influences of gas-exchange physiology in observed distributional and successional patterns. Pine had greater water-use efficiency (photosynthesis/transpiration) in early- versus late-successional environments, primarily as a result of a lower leaf conductance and transpiration. Photosynthetic performance was similar among all three species at each respective microhabitat and increased as the openness of the microhabitat increased. Greater water-use efficiency may significantly improve the growth of pine over spruce and fir on more open, drier sites at lower elevation. Higher transpiration in spruce and fir may limit these species to higher elevation sites, to understory sites at middle elevations, and to moister open sites at lower elevations (e.g., riparian sites).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document