Storage Conditions Affecting Increase in Falling Number of Soft Red Winter Wheat Grain

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taehyun Ji ◽  
Byung-Kee Baik
2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033-1035
Author(s):  
Lily Tamburic-Ilincic ◽  
Arend Smid

Tamburic-Ilincic, L. and Smid, A. 2015. UGRC Ring, soft red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 1033–1035. UGRC Ring is a soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar registered for Ontario, Canada. It has high grain yield, with good pastry quality (high flour yield, high falling number) and is moderately resistant to powdery mildew. UGRC Ring has good winter hardiness and is well adapted for the winter wheat growing areas of Ontario.


Weed Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Schroeder

Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Georgia to evaluate wild radish control and soft red winter wheat tolerance of herbicides applied February 1 (one- to five-tiller stage) or March 1 (three- to seven-tiller stage). Bromoxynil controlled wild radish with no wheat grain or forage yield reductions in any experiment. Thiameturon controlled wild radish when applied at rates >0.02 kg/ha on March 1. Metribuzin, dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D, and dimethylamine salt of MCPA provided late-season control of wild radish. February 1 treatments of metribuzin reduced wheat stands at Plains. The difference was attributed to environmental conditions, wheat tiller number at application, and possibly to differences in soil fertility at planting. Metribuzin, thiameturon, dimethylamine salt of dicamba, MCPA, and 2,4-D reduced wheat forage yield at Tifton. Dicamba did not control wild radish and reduced grain yield when applied at a rate of 0.3 kg ai/ha on March 1.


Crop Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen W. Kirlies ◽  
Thomas L. Housley ◽  
Abdallah M. Emam ◽  
Fred L. Patterson ◽  
Martin R. Okos

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Clayton R. Bailey ◽  
Lathan B. Daniels ◽  
Wayne K. Coblentz ◽  
Elizabeth B. Kegley ◽  
Levi J. McBeth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohamed Mergoum ◽  
Jerry W. Johnson ◽  
James W. Buck ◽  
Steve Sutton ◽  
Benjamin Lopez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Paul ◽  
M. P. McMullen ◽  
D. E. Hershman ◽  
L. V. Madden

Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 12 years of data from 14 U.S. states to determine the mean yield and test-weight responses of wheat to treatment with propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant increase in mean yield and test weight relative to the check (D; P < 0.001). Metconazole resulted in the highest overall yield increase, with a D of 450 kg/ha, followed by prothioconazole+tebuconazole (444.5 kg/ha), prothioconazole (419.1 kg/ha), tebuconazole (272.6 kg/ha), and propiconazole (199.6 kg/ha). Metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole also resulted in the highest increases in test weight, with D values of 17.4 to 19.4 kg/m3, respectively. On a relative scale, the best three fungicides resulted in an overall 13.8 to 15.0% increase in yield but only a 2.5 to 2.8% increase in test weight. Except for prothioconazole+tebuconazole, wheat type significantly affected the yield response to treatment; depending on the fungicide, D was 110.0 to 163.7 kg/ha higher in spring than in soft-red winter wheat. Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease index (field or plot-level severity) in the untreated check plots, a measure of the risk of disease development in a study, had a significant effect on the yield response to treatment, in that D increased with increasing FHB index. The probability was estimated that fungicide treatment in a randomly selected study will result in a positive yield increase (p+) and increases of at least 250 and 500 kg/ha (p250 and p500, respectively). For the three most effective fungicide treatments (metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole) at the higher selected FHB index, p+ was very large (e.g., ≥0.99 for both wheat types) but p500 was considerably lower (e.g., 0.78 to 0.92 for spring and 0.54 to 0.68 for soft-red winter wheat); at the lower FHB index, p500 for the same three fungicides was 0.34 to 0.36 for spring and only 0.09 to 0.23 for soft-red winter wheat.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Amir M. H. Ibrahim ◽  
Russell Sutton ◽  
Jerry W. Johnson ◽  
Mohamed Mergoum ◽  
Bryan Simoneaux ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 844-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. McKendry ◽  
D. N. Tague ◽  
K. E. Miskin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document