Investigating the Protein Kinase C Polarized Growth‐Related Protein Complex in Aspergillus nidulans

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Loretta Jackson-Hayes ◽  
Alexis Craft ◽  
Muhammad Hameed ◽  
Zariah Hines ◽  
W. Toler Freyaldenhoven ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette G. Teepe ◽  
Darlene M. Loprete ◽  
Zhumei He ◽  
Timothy A. Hoggard ◽  
Terry W. Hill

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 2957-2970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Herrmann ◽  
Petra Spröte ◽  
Axel A. Brakhage

ABSTRACT The biosynthesis of the β-lactam antibiotic penicillin in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans is catalyzed by three enzymes that are encoded by the acvA, ipnA, and aatA genes. A variety of cis-acting DNA elements and regulatory factors form a complex regulatory network controlling these β-lactam biosynthesis genes. Regulators involved include the CCAAT-binding complex AnCF and AnBH1. AnBH1 acts as a repressor of the penicillin biosynthesis gene aatA. Until now, however, little information has been available on the signal transduction cascades leading to the transcription factors. Here we show that inhibition of protein kinase C (Pkc) activity in A. nidulans led to cytoplasmic localization of an AnBH1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion protein. Computer analysis of the genome and screening of an A. nidulans gene library revealed that the fungus possesses two putative Pkc-encoding genes, which we designated pkcA and pkcB. Only PkcA showed all the characteristic features of fungal Pkc's. Production of pkcA antisense RNA in A. nidulans led to reduced growth and conidiation in Aspergillus minimal medium, while in fermentation medium it led to enhanced expression of an aatAp-lacZ gene fusion, reduced pencillin production, and predominantly cytoplasmic localization of AnBH1. These data agree with the finding that inhibition of Pkc activity prevented nuclear localization of AnBH1-EGFP. As a result, repression of aatA expression was relieved. The involvement of Pkc in penicillin biosynthesis is also interesting in light of the fact that in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pkc plays a major role in maintaining cell integrity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 287 (24) ◽  
pp. 20590-20602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika F. Bauer ◽  
Silvina Sonzogni ◽  
Lucas Meyer ◽  
Stefan Zeuzem ◽  
Albrecht Piiper ◽  
...  

Mycologia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 452-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta Jackson-Hayes ◽  
Terry W. Hill ◽  
Darlene M. Loprete ◽  
Claire E. DelBove ◽  
Justin A. Shapiro ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 330 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy VERGÈRES ◽  
J. Jeremy RAMSDEN

The myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) protein family has two known members, MARCKS itself and MARCKS-related protein (MRP, also called MacMARCKS or F52). They are essential for brain development and are believed to regulate the structure of the actin cytoskeleton at the plasma membrane. Hence membrane binding is central to their function. MARCKS has been quite extensively characterized; MRP much less so. Despite the fact that MRP is only two thirds the size of MARCKS, it has hitherto been assumed that the two proteins have similar properties. Here we make a detailed study, including the effects of myristoylation, lipid composition, calmodulin and phosphorylation of the binding of MRP to phospholipid vesicles. We show that both the N-terminal myristoyl moiety and the central effector domain mediate binding. MRP behaves like MARCKS in the presence of neutral phospholipids. In contrast to MARCKS, however, the incorporation of 20% of negatively-charged phospholipids only marginally increases the affinity of myristoylated MRP. Co-operativity between the myristoyl moiety and the effector domain of MRP is weak and the protein has a significantly lower affinity for these vesicles compared with MARCKS. Furthermore, calmodulin or phosphorylation of the effector domain by the catalytic subunit of protein kinase C do not significantly decrease the binding of myristoylated MRP to negatively-charged phospholipid vesicles. Our results show that the mechanisms regulating the interactions of MARCKS and MRP with phospholipid vesicles are, at least quantitatively, different. In agreement with cellular studies, we therefore propose that MARCKS and MRP have different subcellular localization and, consequently, different functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document