Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Morphine Administration in Hepatobiliary Imaging for Acute Cholecystitis

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
TONY E. VASQUEZ ◽  
GILBERT GREENSPAN ◽  
DAVID G. EVANS ◽  
SAMUEL E. HALPERN ◽  
WILLIAM L. ASHBURN
Radiology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 238-239
Author(s):  
William P. Shuman ◽  
Thomas G. Rudd ◽  
James V. Rogers ◽  
John K. Stevenson ◽  
Eric B. Larson

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jan Starlander ◽  
Christina Melin-Johansson ◽  
Håkan Jonsson ◽  
Bertil Axelsson

Objective. This pilot study clinically tests whether a conversion factor of 2 to 1 is appropriate when changing from oral to parenteral morphine administration in the treatment of cancer-related nociceptive pain and calculates the size of an adequately powered future study. Methods. Eleven outpatients with incurable cancer and well-controlled nociceptive pain were randomly assigned to either intravenous or subcutaneous morphine using half the previous oral 24-hour dose. Each group crossed over after the first three-day period. Serum concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were monitored as well as intensity of pain. Results. Oral to subcutaneous and oral to intravenous quotas of morphine concentrations were approximately 0.9. Subcutaneous to intravenous morphine quotas were 1. Conclusions. The conversion factor of 2 to 1 seems to be a reasonable average but with an obvious need for individual adjustments. Concurrent medications and substantially higher doses of morphine could potentially affect the appropriate conversion factor. An adequately powered study to validate these findings would need at least 121 patients.


1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 536-538
Author(s):  
JAMES D. SLAVIN ◽  
ZAHIDA YOOSUFANI ◽  
RICHARD P. SPENCER

Radiology ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
B I Samuels ◽  
J E Freitas ◽  
R L Bree ◽  
R E Schwab ◽  
S T Heller

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 779-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadir I. Osman ◽  
Helen A. Baghdoyan ◽  
Ralph Lydic

Background Cortical acetylcholine originates in the basal forebrain and is essential for maintaining normal cognition and arousal. Morphine impairs these cholinergically mediated cortical functions. The current study tested the hypothesis that morphine decreases prefrontal cortical acetylcholine release by acting at the level of the basal forebrain. Methods Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 18) were anesthetized with isoflurane. One microdialysis probe was placed in the substantia innominata region of the basal forebrain and perfused with Ringer's solution (control) followed by one concentration of morphine (1, 10, 100, or 1,000 microm) or morphine (1,000 microm) plus naloxone (100 microm). A second microdialysis probe was placed in the prefrontal cortex for measuring acetylcholine. In a second series of experiments, rats (n = 6) were implanted with electrodes for recording states of arousal, a guide cannula positioned above the prefrontal cortex for inserting a microdialysis probe, and an indwelling jugular vein catheter. The effects of administering intravenous morphine (30 mg/kg) versus normal saline (0.9%) on prefrontal cortical acetylcholine release, cortical electroencephalographic power, and behavior were quantified. Results Dialysis delivery of morphine to the substantia innominata caused a concentration-dependent, naloxone-sensitive decrease in acetylcholine release within the prefrontal cortex. The maximal decrease in acetylcholine was 36.3 +/- 11.5%. Intravenous morphine administration significantly decreased cortical acetylcholine release, increased electroencephalographic power in the 0.5- to 5-Hz range, and eliminated normal wakefulness. Conclusion Morphine causes obtundation of arousal and may cause cognitive impairment by acting at the level of the substantia innominata to disrupt cortical cholinergic neurotransmission.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Stiermaier ◽  
P Schaefer ◽  
M Saad ◽  
R Meyer-Saraei ◽  
S De Waha-Thiele ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intravenous morphine administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can adversely affect platelet inhibition induced by P2Y12 receptor antagonists, potentially resulting in an increased risk of adverse clinical events. In contrast, some evidence suggests that opioid agonists may have cardioprotective effects on the myocardium. Currently available data in this regard are, however, sparse, inconsistent, and methodologically limited. Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of morphine with or without metoclopramide (MCP) co-administration on myocardial and microvascular injury after AMI assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods This prospective, randomized, single-center study assigned 138 patients with AMI in a 1:1:1 ratio to (a) ticagrelor 180 mg plus intravenous morphine 5 mg (morphine group); (b) ticagrelor 180 mg plus intravenous morphine 5 mg and MCP 10 mg (morphine + MCP group); or (c) ticagrelor 180 mg plus intravenous placebo (control group). Study drugs were administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. CMR was performed in 101 patients on day 1–4 after the index event to assess infarct size, microvascular obstruction, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Results Infarct size was significantly smaller in the morphine only group as compared to controls (15.5%LV [IQR 5.0 to 21.4%LV] vs. 17.9%LV [IQR 12.3 to 32.9%LV]; p=0.047). Furthermore, the number of patients with microvascular obstruction was significantly lower after morphine administration (10/36 [28%] versus 21/39 [54%]; p=0.022) and the extent of microvascular obstruction was smaller (0%LV [0 to 1.40%LV] versus 0.74%LV [0 to 3.10%LV]; p=0.037). In multivariable regression analysis, morphine administration was independently associated with a reduced risk for the occurrence of microvascular obstruction (odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.93; p=0.035). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ significantly between the morphine and the control group (p=0.970) and there was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.790), infarct size (p=0.491), and extent (p=0.753) or presence (p=0.914) of microvascular obstruction when comparing the morphine + MCP group to the control group. Conclusions In this randomized study, intravenous administration of morphine prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in a significant reduction of myocardial and microvascular damage following AMI. This potential cardioprotective effect of morphine requires further evaluation in well-designed future trials with clinical endpoints. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 1006-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mourad Aissou ◽  
Aurelie Snauwaert ◽  
Claire Dupuis ◽  
Arthur Atchabahian ◽  
Frederic Aubrun ◽  
...  

Background The evaluation of pain intensity during the immediate postoperative period is a key factor for pain management. However, this evaluation may be difficult in some circumstances. The pupillary dilatation reflex (PDR) has been successfully used to assess the analgesic component of a balanced anesthetic regimen. We hypothesized that PDR could be a reliable index of pain intensity and could guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period. Methods One hundred patients scheduled to undergo general surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Pain intensity was assessed by using a simple five-item verbal rating scale (VRS). After patients awoke from general anesthesia, those experiencing mild or more severe pain (VRS more than 1) received intravenous morphine titration. Before and after intravenous morphine titration, the PDR induced by a standardized noxious stimulus was measured with a portable pupillometer. A receiver-operating curve was built to estimate the accuracy of PDR in objectively detecting patients requiring morphine titration. Results are given as median (95% CI). Results On the initial evaluation, a correlation was found between VRS and PDR (ρ = 0.88 [0.83-0.92], P < 0.0001). In the 39 patients that had a VRS more than 1, PDR before and after morphine titration was respectively 35% (31-43) versus 12% (10-14); P < 0.0001. The PDR threshold value corresponding to the highest accuracy to have VRS more than 1 was 23%, with 91% and 94% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusion In the immediate postoperative period, the PDR is significantly correlated with the VRS. The pupillometer could be a valuable tool to guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document