Influences of pneumoperitoneum on tissue oxygenation during laparoscopic abdominal surgery in normal weight and morbidly obese patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement 32) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
E. Fleischmann ◽  
B. Kabon ◽  
M. Niedermayr ◽  
O. Kimberger ◽  
A. Kurz
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney A. Coursey ◽  
Rendon C. Nelson ◽  
Ricardo D. Moreno ◽  
Mayur B. Patel ◽  
Craig A. Beam ◽  
...  

The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters2) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients at least 18 years of age who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007. BMI was computed for the 703 of these 925 patients for whom height and weight information was available. Patients were stratified based on body mass index (BMI 15-18.49 = underweight; 18.5-24.9 = normal weight; 25–29.9 = overweight; 30-39.9 = obese; > 40 = morbidly obese). Negative appendectomy rates were computed. Negative appendectomy rates for patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT were 27 per cent and 50 per cent for underweight patients, 10 per cent and 15 per cent for normal weight patients, 12 per cent and 17 per cent for overweight patients, 7 per cent and 30 per cent for obese patients, and 10 per cent and 100 per cent for morbidly obese patients. The difference in negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT as compared with patients in the same BMI category who did not undergo preoperative CT was statistically significant ( P ≤ 0.001). The negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT were significantly lower than for patients in these same BMI categories who did not undergo preoperative CT.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Fuller ◽  
Hassan Razvi ◽  
John D. Denstedt ◽  
Linda Nott ◽  
Ad Hendrikx ◽  
...  

Background: Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have been demonstrated in obese individuals. Yet, there is a paucity of data on the outcomes of PCNL in morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >40).Methods: Perioperative and stone-related outcomes following PCNL in morbidly obese patients was assessed using a prospective database administered by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). A multidimensional match of 97 morbidly obese patients with those of normal weight was created using propensity score matching. Student’s t-test and Chi-square tests were used to assess for differences between the groups.Results: In total, 97 patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 were matched by stone characteristics with 97 patients of normal weight. The morbidly obese population demonstrated higher rates of diabetes mellitus (43% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease (56% vs. 18%, (p < 0.001). Access was achieved more frequently by radiologists in the morbidly obese group (19% vs. 6%, p = 0.016). Mean operative duration was longer in the morbidly obese group (112 ± 56 min vs. 86 ± 43.5 min, p < 0.001). Stone-free rates were lower in the morbidly obese group (66% vs. 77%, p = 0.071). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay or transfusion rate. Morbidly obese patients were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication (22% vs. 6%, p = 0.004).Interpretation: PCNL in morbidly obese patients is associated with longer operative duration, higher rates of re-intervention and an increased risk of perioperative complications. With this knowledge, urologists should seek to develop strategies to optimize the perioperative management of such patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Hans ◽  
Audrey A. Prégaldien ◽  
Abdourahamane Kaba ◽  
Thierry M. Sottiaux ◽  
Arnaud DeRoover ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Bauer ◽  
W. A. Drew Edwards ◽  
E. Patchen Dellinger ◽  
D. A. Simonowitz

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1320-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk S Schipper ◽  
Wilco de Jager ◽  
Mariska EA van Dijk ◽  
Jenny Meerding ◽  
Pierre MJ Zelissen ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDAdipose tissue secretory proteins, called adipokines, play pivotal roles in the pathophysiology of obesity and its associated disorders such as metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Because methods for comprehensive adipokine profiling in patient plasma and other biological samples are currently limited, we developed a multiplex immunoassay for rapid and high-throughput measurement of 25 adipokines in only 50 μL of sample.METHODS(Pre)adipocyte and ex vivo cultured adipose tissue supernatants were generated and together with plasma from 5 morbidly obese patients and 5 healthy and normal weight controls used to develop the adipokine multiplex immunoassay and test its usefulness in biological samples. We assessed adipokine dynamic ranges, lower limits of detection and quantification, cross-reactivity, intra- and interassay variation, and correlation with adipokine ELISAs.RESULTSThe limits of quantification and broad dynamic ranges enabled measurement of all 25 adipokines in supernatants and patient plasmas, with the exception of TNF-α in plasma samples. Intraassay variation was &lt;10% for all adipokines; interassay variation was &lt;15%. The multiplex immunoassay results correlated significantly with ELISA measurements. Plasma adipokine profiling showed significantly higher concentrations of the novel adipokines cathepsin S (5.1 × 104 vs 4.3 × 104 ng/L, P = 0.003) and chemerin (4.1 × 105 vs 2.7 × 105 ng/L, P = 0.0008) in morbidly obese patients than normal weight controls, besides the established differences in adiponectin and leptin concentrations.CONCLUSIONSOur findings underscore the relevance of the novel adipokines cathepsin S and chemerin, but foremost the potential of this novel method for both comprehensive adipokine profiling in large patient cohorts and for biological discovery.


Author(s):  
Sittinun Thangjui ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
Ratdanai Yodsuwan ◽  
Angkawipa Trongtorsak ◽  
Harshith Thyagaturu ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on three outcomes. We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the efficacy and safety of DOAC in obese patients and non-obese patients with AF. Finally, we updated the current knowledge of outcomes of AF patients with obesity compared with normal-weight patients regardless of anticoagulation type. Methods and results  Using PubMed and Embase, we searched for literature published from inception to August 2020 for studies conducted in morbidly obese patients with AF who used DOACs and/or VKA for stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) prevention that report efficacy and/or safety data. GRADE assessment was performed to determine the quality of the meta-analysis results. Direct oral anticoagulant was not statistically different from VKA in reducing stroke/SE with relative risk (RR) of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56–1.29; very low certainty evidence]. Major bleeding risk was lower in the DOAC groups with RR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.48–0.80; low certainty evidence). Obese patients with AF who used DOACs had lower risk of stroke/SE and similar major bleeding risk compared to non-obese patients with RR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70–0.84; low certainty evidence) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.94–1.09; low certainty evidence), respectively. Obese patients with AF who used any type of anticoagulant had lower risk of stroke/SE compared to normal-weight patients with RR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57–0.69; low certainty evidence). Conclusion  The use of DOACs in morbidly obese patients may be reasonable if needed, and more dedicated studies are needed to make a more robust recommendation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 919-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Keyser ◽  
Alois Philipp ◽  
Florian Zeman ◽  
Matthias Lubnow ◽  
Dirk Lunz ◽  
...  

Background: Extracorporeal life support systems are well-established devices for treating patients with acute cardiopulmonary failure. Severe or morbid obesity may result in complications such as limb ischemia, bleeding, unsuccessful cannulation, or infection at the cannulation sites. This article reports on our experience with cannulation and associated complications in severely and morbidly obese patients. Methods: Between January 2006 and September 2016, 153 severely or morbidly obese patients with a body mass index >35 kg/m2 were cannulated percutaneously for extracorporeal life support at our center. Among those, 115 patients were treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for acute lung failure and 38 patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock. Complications related to percutaneous access and long-term follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Primary focus was on the success of cannulation, outcome, thrombosis, bleeding, limb ischemia, and infection at the cannulation site. Normal-weight patients receiving extracorporeal life support served as control. Results: Percutaneous cannulation was successfully performed in all patients. Eighty-five (74%) patients were weaned from VV ECMO and 20 (52%) patients were weaned from VA ECMO. Limb ischemia requiring surgical intervention occurred in 5 (3%) patients, bleeding in 7 (5%) patients, and wound infection in 3 (2%) patients. In all other patients, decannulation was uneventful. These data as well as the long-term survival rates were comparable to those of normal-weight patients ( P > .05). Conclusion: Percutaneous vessel cannulation for extracorporeal life support systems is generally feasible. Therefore, percutaneous cannulation may well be performed in severely and morbidly obese patients. Patient outcome rather depends on appropriate support than on anatomy.


Author(s):  
Okechukwu V Nwogbo ◽  
Asad Ullah ◽  
Gurmukh Singh

Abstract Objectives Obesity predisposes to multiple diseases, such as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, arthritis, and malignancy. However, obese patients have better outcomes than normal-weight patients with some of these disorders, including those admitted to critical care units. We compared the results for common laboratory tests in patients with uncomplicated obesity against the findings in normal-weight patients. Methods Patients who had a comprehensive metabolic profile test were identified. Patients with acute and/or chronic debilitating disorders were excluded, and the laboratory parameters were compared among 4 groups based on body mass index. Results With the exception of elevated triglycerides and lower high-density lipoprotein in obese and morbidly obese patients, laboratory findings were not meaningfully different from those in normal-weight patients. Conclusions The obesity paradox of better outcomes in obese patients admitted to critical care units could not be explained on the basis of lower additional disease burden necessitating critical care admission due to abnormal laboratory values at the baseline. It is conceivable that unconscious bias against obese patients, with lower disease burden than normal-weight patients, triggers their admission to critical care, thus creating the appearance of better outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document