Attenuation of Ischemic Brain EDEMA and Cerebrovascular Injury after Ischemic Preconditioning in the Rat

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Masada ◽  
Ya Hua ◽  
Guohua Xi ◽  
Steven R. Ennis ◽  
Richard F. Keep

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) induces neuroprotection to subsequent severe ischemia, but its effect on the cerebrovasculature has not been studied extensively. This study evaluated the effects of IPC on brain edema formation and endothelial cell damage that follows subsequent permanent focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Transient (15 minute) middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) was used for IPC. Three days after IPC or a sham operation, permanent MCAO was induced. Twenty-four hours after permanent MCAO, neurologic deficit, infarction volume, and water and ion content were evaluated. Six hours post-ischemia, blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability was examined using [3H]-inulin. Water, ion contents, and BBB permeability were assessed in three zones (core, intermediate, and outer) depending on their relation to the MCA territory. Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) was also examined as a potential marker of vascular injury. The model of IPC significantly reduced brain infarction and neurologic deficit. Compared with a sham operation, IPC also significantly attenuated brain edema formation in the intermediate (sham and IPC water contents: 5.99 ± 0.65 vs. 4.99 ± 0.81 g/g dry weight; P < 0.01) and outer zones (5.02 ± 0.48 vs. 4.37 ± 0.42 g/g dry weight; P < 0.01) of the ipsilateral hemisphere but not in the core zone. Blood–brain barrier disruption assessed by [3H]-inulin was significantly attenuated in the IPC group and the number of blood vessels that displayed HSP70 immunoreactivity was also reduced. Thus, IPC significantly attenuates ischemic brain edema formation, BBB disruption, and, as assessed by HSP70, vascular injury. Understanding the mechanisms involved in IPC may provide insight into methods for preserving cerebrovascular function during ischemia.

1992 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasundo Yamasaki ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Hidetoshi Yamaya ◽  
Naosuke Matsuura ◽  
Hiroshi Onodera ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Lorris Betz ◽  
Steven R. Ennis ◽  
Xiao-dan Ren ◽  
Gerald P. Schielke ◽  
Richard F. Keep

Author(s):  
Michael P. Pash ◽  
W. Arnold Tweed

SUMMARY:Brain edema (BE) research lacks quantitative regional methods. We modified the method of Pappius and McCann (1969), who used radioactive iodinated I125 serum albumin (RISA) as a label for vasogenic BE fluid. To correct for intravascular plasma volume we used Cr51 labelled red blood cells and calculated equivalent extravascular plasma volume (EVPV). The modified RISA method was compared with a standard method for measuring increased tissue water, i.e. the change in wef.dry weights. Anesthetized rabbits were subjected to unilateral cortical freeze injury and sacrificed three hours later. The lesion corresponding to the area of blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown was delineated by Evan's blue staining. That area and the two adjacent poles were sectioned. The contralateral hemisphere was used as the control. Good agreement was found between the two methods. By the modified RISA method, 4.08% of the wet weight of the injured hemisphere was EVPV while the decrease in dry weight corresponded to 5.56% edema. In the freeze lesion, however, where BBB breakdown occurred extravascular (EV)protein exceeded EV water, while adjacent to the lesion in the area with intact BBB, EV water exceeded EV protein. This suggests that the diffusion rate for water through brain tissue exceeds that of albumin in the early stages of vasogenic BE formation. We conclude that the modified RISA method is a satisfactory measure of regional vasogenic BE in acute animal experiments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document