scholarly journals PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVEL AND STAGES OF CHANGE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S365
Author(s):  
D. M. Jehue ◽  
S. M. Barnd ◽  
J. C. Schultz
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Devine

College years are an experimental phase in young adulthood and can lay the foundation for lifelong behaviors. One type of behavior developed during these years is the use of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA). LTPA experiences of typical college students have been examined, but there is a lack of studies examining the experiences of students with disabilities. The purpose of this inquiry is to understand the experiences of college students with disabilities and their LTPA, with focus on factors that facilitate or create barriers to engagement. Grounded theory was used to understand LTPA with undergraduates with mobility or visual impairments. Results indicated a theme of culture of physical activity and disability as they received a message that engagement in LTPA was “unnecessary” or “heroic,” which altered their LTPA experiences. Barriers to LTPA can be understood through a social relational lens to recognize the multidimensionality of barriers and facilitators to LTPA.


Author(s):  
Valentin Magnon ◽  
Guillaume T. Vallet ◽  
Frédéric Dutheil ◽  
Catherine Auxiette

Background: Currently, sedentariness is assessed over a short period of time, thus it is difficult to study its cognitive implications. To investigate the cognitive consequences of a sedentary lifestyle, the past level (i.e., the sedentary time accumulated over the years) and current level of sedentariness should be considered. This pilot study aimed to investigate the negative association between a sedentary lifestyle and cognition by considering both the current and past sedentariness. It was expected that the physical activity level moderates the potential negative association between sedentariness and cognition. Methods: 52 college students (Mage = 20.19, SDage = 2; 36 women) participated in the study. Current sedentariness (ratio of sedentary time in the last year), past sedentariness (ratio of sedentary time accumulated in previous years), and physical activity (ratio of time spent in physical activity in years) were assessed using a questionnaire. Cognitive inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and working memory updating were measured through three specific tests. Results: Past sedentariness significantly explained the inhibition performance when controlled for physical activity, whereas current sedentariness did not. More precisely, past sedentariness only negatively predicted cognitive inhibition when the physical activity level was low (β = −3.15, z(48) = −2.62, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The impact of sedentariness on cognitive functioning might only be revealed when past sedentariness and physical activity are controlled.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Ashby M. Williamson ◽  
Danielle N. Ludlam ◽  
Sarah M. Henry ◽  
George W. Lyerly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document