Involvement of Vasopressin in Brain Edema Formation: Further Evidence Obtained from the Brattleboro Diabetes Insipidus Rat with Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Neurosurgery ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dóczi Tamás ◽  
A. Lászlö Ferenc ◽  
Szerdahelyi Péter ◽  
Joó Ferenc
2013 ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Jin-Yul Lee ◽  
Richard F. Keep ◽  
Aditya Pandey ◽  
Neeraj Chaudhary ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino T. Trevisani ◽  
Steven R. Shackford ◽  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
Joseph D. Schmoker

Author(s):  
A. Lorris Betz ◽  
Steven R. Ennis ◽  
Xiao-dan Ren ◽  
Gerald P. Schielke ◽  
Richard F. Keep

Author(s):  
Binika Hada ◽  
Mrigendra Bir Karmacharya ◽  
So R. Park ◽  
Byung H. Choi

AbstractBackground: We have previously shown that low-intensity ultrasound (LIUS), a noninvasive mechanical stimulus, inhibits brain edema formation induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) or treatment with glutamate, a mediator of OGD-induced edema, in acute rat hippocampal slice model in vitro. Methods: In this study, we treated the rat hippocampal slices with N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) or (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) to determine whether these different glutamate receptor agonists induce edema. The hippocampal slices were then either sonicated with LIUS or treated with N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) antagonists, namely, MK-801 and ketamine, and observed their effects on edema formation. Results: We observed that treatment with NMDA, an agonist of ionotropic glutamate receptors, induced brain edema at similar degrees compared with that induced by OGD. However, treatment with DHPG, an agonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors, did not significantly induce brain edema. Treatment with the NMDAR antagonists MK-801 or ketamine efficiently prevented brain edema formation by both OGD and NMDA in a concentration-dependent manner. N-Methyl-d-aspartic acid-induced brain edema was alleviated by LIUS in an intensity-dependent manner when ultrasound was administered at 30, 50, or 100 mW/cm2 for 20 minutes before the induction of the edema. Furthermore, LIUS reduced OGD- and NMDA-induced phosphorylation of NMDARs at Y1325. Conclusion: These results suggest that LIUS can inhibit OGD- or NMDA-induced NMDAR activation by preventing NMDAR phosphorylation, thereby reducing a subsequent brain edema formation. The mechanisms by which LIUS inhibits NMDAR phosphorylation need further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document