scholarly journals Healthcare Workers and Occupational Exposure to AIDS

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW S. LEVINE ◽  
MICHELE M. GOODY
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Enis Uruci

Exposure prevention is the primary strategy to reduce the risk of occupational bloodborne pathogen infections in healthcare workers (HCW). HCWs should be made aware of the medicolegal and clinical relevance of reporting an exposure, and have ready access to expert consultants to receive appropriate counselling, treatment and follow-up. Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV), and demonstration of immunisation before employment are strongly recommended. HCWs with postvaccinal anti-HBs levels, 1-2 months after vaccine completion, .or=10 mIU/mL are considered as responders. Responders are protected against HBV infection: booster doses of vaccine or periodic antibody concentration testing are not recommended. Alternative strategies to overcome non-response should be adopted. Isolated anti-HBc positive HCWs should be tested for anti-HBcIgM and HBV-DNA: if negative, anti-HBs response to vaccination can distinguish between infection (anti-HBs .or=50 mIU/ml 30 days after 1st vaccination: anamnestic response) and false positive results(anti-HBs .or=10 mUI/ml 30 days after 3rd vaccination: primary response); true positive subjects have resistance to re-infection. and do not need vaccination The management of an occupational exposure to HBV differs according to the susceptibility of the exposed HCW and the serostatus of the source. When indicated, post-exposure prophylaxis with HBV vaccine, hepatitis B immunoglobulin or both must be started as soon as possible (within 1-7 days). In the absence of prophylaxis against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, follow-up management of HCV exposures depends on whether antiviral treatment during the acute phase is chosen. Test the HCW for HCV-Ab at baseline and after 6 months; up to 12 for HIV-HCV co-infected sources. If treatment is recommended, perform ALT (amino alanine transferase) activity at baseline and monthly for 4 months after exposure, and qualitative HCV-RNA when an increase is detected. Introduction Bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) represent an important hazard for healthcare workers (HCWs) (1). In the general population, HCV prevalence varies geographically from about 0.5% in northern countries to 2% in Mediterranean countries, with some 5 million chronic carriers estimated in Europe; while HBV prevalence ranges from 0.3% to 3%. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that each year in Europe 304 000 HCWs are exposed to at least one percutaneous injury with a sharp object contaminated with HBV, 149 000 are exposed to HCV and 22 000 to HIV. The probability of acquiring a bloodborne infection following an occupational exposure has been estimated to be on average.


2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Mihaela Stoia

Abstract This study aims to estimate the occupational etiology of COVID-19 in the healthcare sector and obtain a risk matrix for the burden of disease across occupations and specific activities. The study population included 4515 cases and 133077 controls. We have used an epidemiological model that included data collected over one year from employed persons with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, age group 20-64, and residing in Sibiu County. We measured the incidence rate (IR), relative risk (RR), and risk of COVID-19 attributable to the occupational exposure (AR), respectively, statistical analysis based on frequency distribution and the portion of cases to compute the risk levels in social- and healthcare workers. According to this model, approximately 70.5% of COVID-19 risk could be attributable to occupational exposure. The workplace is a strong predictor of infection risk (RR 3.4), particularly in residential long-term care facilities, hospitals, and ambulance services. The highest-risk job functions are nurse, nursing assistant, ambulance worker, and dentist. In conclusion, we believe in having demonstrated that epidemiological modeling may be helpful for risk management and notification of COVID-19 as an occupational disease in frontline staff and essential healthcare personnel.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Bojana Mandić ◽  
Stefan Mandić-Rajčević ◽  
Ljiljana Marković-Denić ◽  
Petar Bulat

Abstract The risk of occupational bloodborne infections (HBV, HCV, and HIV) among healthcare workers remains a serious issue in developing countries. The aim of this study was to estimate occupational exposure to bloodborne infections among general hospital workers in Serbia. This cross-sectional study was conducted in the spring of 2013 and included 5,247 healthcare workers from 17 general hospitals. The questionnaire was anonymous, self-completed, and included sociodemographic information with details of blood and bodily fluid exposure over the career and in the previous year (2012). Significant predictors of sharps injuries were determined with multiple logistic regressions. The distribution of accidents in 2012 was equal between the genders (39 %), but in entire career it was more prevalent in women (67 %). The most vulnerable group were nurses. Most medical doctors, nurses, and laboratory technicians reported stabs or skin contact with patients’ blood/other bodily fluid/tissue as their last accident. Healthcare workers from the north/west part of the country reported a significantly lower number of accidents over the entire career than the rest of the country (p<0.001). The south of Serbia stood out as the most accident-prone in 2012 (p=0.042).


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Sofie Rudberg ◽  
Sebastian Havervall ◽  
Anna Månberg ◽  
August Jernbom Falk ◽  
Katherina Aguilera ◽  
...  

Abstract SARS-CoV-2 may pose an occupational health risk to healthcare workers. Here, we report the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, self-reported symptoms and occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers at a large acute care hospital in Sweden. The seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was 19.1% among the 2149 healthcare workers recruited between April 14th and May 8th 2020, which was higher than the reported regional seroprevalence during the same time period. Symptoms associated with seroprevalence were anosmia (odds ratio (OR) 28.4, 95% CI 20.6–39.5) and ageusia (OR 19.2, 95% CI 14.3–26.1). Seroprevalence was also associated with patient contact (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9–4.5) and covid-19 patient contact (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.2–5.3). These findings imply an occupational risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers. Continued measures are warranted to assure healthcare workers safety and reduce transmission from healthcare workers to patients and to the community.


2017 ◽  
Vol 599-600 ◽  
pp. 1939-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laetitia Minh Mai Le ◽  
Delphine Reitter ◽  
Sophie He ◽  
Franck Té Bonle ◽  
Amélie Launois ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document