scholarly journals 851: PICS CLINIC MED REC AND SPECIALTY REFERRALS FROM A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ENHANCE HOLISTIC CARE

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 420-420
Author(s):  
Jason Makii ◽  
Janet Kloos ◽  
Kehllee Popovich ◽  
Michael Dzigiel ◽  
stephanie Kubec ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jefferies ◽  
K. K. Chan

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) working has been endorsed as the main mechanism to ensure truly holistic care for patients and a seamless service for patients throughout their disease trajectory and across the boundaries of primary, secondary, and tertiary care. However the effectiveness of each team needs to be continually evaluated to ensure that all the relevant disciplines are able to participate in the clinical management of patients. This article describes the work of the Cancer Services Collaborative at the Birmingham Women's hospital in the UK in promoting the development of a holistic MDT in parallel with the medical model.


Osteomyelitis is a fascinating condition that can affect all parts of the human skeleton. It presents in several distinct ways, but all have varying degrees of inflammation, systemic ill health, bone death, and soft-tissue compromise. Understanding the components of the disease and the interplay between bacteria, biofilm formation, and the host response is critical to successful treatment. Recent advances in diagnostic methods, imaging, local delivery of antimicrobials, and bone reconstruction have greatly improved the outcome for many patients. Surgery remains central to the effective treatment of chronic osteomyelitis and many acute cases. Eradication of infection is largely dependent on the skill of the surgeon in identifying the areas of dead bone and removing them during surgery. Osteomyelitis is challenging and rewarding to treat, and most patients should enjoy prolonged disease-free periods or cure. Holistic care of the patient requires close collaborative working in a multidisciplinary team including physicians, surgeons, nurses, and therapists to achieve the best outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1356-1362
Author(s):  
Laurence Tan Lean Chin ◽  
Yu Jun Lim ◽  
Wan Ling Choo

Purpose Palliative care is a philosophy of care that encompasses holistic, patient-centric care involving patients and their family members and loved ones. Palliative care patients often have complex needs. A common challenge in managing patients near their end of life is the complexity of navigating clinical decisions and finding achievable and realistic goals of care that are in line with the values and wishes of patients. This often results in differing opinions and conflicts within the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion This article describes a tool derived from the biopsychosocial model and the 4-quadrant ethical model. The authors describe the use of this tool in managing a patient who wishes to have fried chicken despite aspiration risk and how this tool was used to encourage discussions and reduce conflict and distress within the multidisciplinary team.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caryn Easterling

Our professional American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) guidelines state, if a speech-language pathologist suspects on the basis of the clinical history that there may be an esophageal disorder contributing to the patient's dysphagia, then “An esophageal screening can be incorporated into most [videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, or] VFSS” (ASHA, 2004). However, the esophageal screen has not been defined by ASHA or by the American College of Radiology. This “Food for Thought” column suggests deglutologists work together to determine the procedure and expected outcome for the esophageal screen so that there is acceptance and consensus among the multidisciplinary team members who evaluate patients with dysphagia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 179-180
Author(s):  
A.L. Beavis ◽  
A.F. Rositch ◽  
A. Romero-Sackey ◽  
A. Viswanathan ◽  
A.N. Fader ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian-Alexander Behrendt ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Thea Schwaneberg ◽  
Holger Diener ◽  
Ralf Hohnhold ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Worldwide prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is increasing and peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has become the primary invasive treatment. There is evidence that multidisciplinary team decision-making (MTD) has an impact on in-hospital outcomes. This study aims to depict practice patterns and time changes regarding MTD of different medical specialties. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study design. 20,748 invasive, percutaneous PVI of PAD conducted in the metropolitan area of Hamburg (Germany) were consecutively collected between January 2004 and December 2014. Results: MTD prior to PVI was associated with lower odds of early unsuccessful termination of the procedures (Odds Ratio 0.662, p < 0.001). The proportion of MTD decreased over the study period (30.9 % until 2009 vs. 16.6 % from 2010, p < 0.001) while rates of critical limb-threatening ischemia (34.5 % vs. 42.1 %), patients´ age (70 vs. 72 years), PVI below-the-knee (BTK) (13.2 % vs. 22.4 %), and rates of severe TASC C/D lesions BTK (43.2 % vs. 54.2 %) increased (all p < 0.001). Utilization of MTD was different between medical specialties with lowest frequency in procedures performed by internists when compared to other medical specialties (7.1 % vs. 25.7 %, p < 0.001). Conclusions: MTD prior to PVI is associated with technical success of the procedure. Nonetheless, rates of MTD prior to PVI are decreasing during the study period. Future studies should address the impact of multidisciplinary vascular teams on long-term outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document