scholarly journals CE: Reimagining Injurious Falls and Safe Mobility

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 34-44
Author(s):  
Ann L. Hendrich
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Christian Hentschke ◽  
Martin Halle ◽  
Barbara Geilhof ◽  
Peter Landendoerfer ◽  
Wolfgang Blank ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Falls and fall-related injuries are common in community-dwelling older persons. Longitudinal data on effective fall prevention programs are rare. Objective Therefore, we evaluated a 4-months multi-component exercise fall prevention program in a primary care setting on long-term effects over 24 months on falls and concomitant injuries in older community-dwelling persons with high risk of falling. Design and Setting In the Prevention of Falls (PreFalls) study, forty general practitioners in Germany were cluster-randomized (1:1) into an intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). Three hundred seventy-eight independently living people with high risk of falling (78.1 ± 5.9 years, 75% women) were assigned to IG (n = 222) or CG (n = 156). Intervention and Measurements Patients in IG took part in a 4-months multi-component exercise program comprising strength and balance exercises (28 sessions); patients in CG received no intervention. Primary outcome measure was number of falls over 24 months, analyzed by a patient-level, linear mixed Poisson model. Secondary endpoints were number of fall-related injuries, changes in physical function, fear of falling, and mortality. Results After 24 months, the IG demonstrated significantly fewer falls (IRR = 0.63, p = 0.021), injurious falls (IRR = 0.69, p = 0.034), and less fear of falling (p = 0.005). The mortality rate was 5.0% in IG and 10.3% in CG (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.12; p = 0.094). Conclusions In older community-dwelling persons with high risk of falling, a short-term multi-component exercise intervention reduced falls and injurious falls, as well as fear of falling over 24 months.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S492-S493
Author(s):  
Amy K Drahota ◽  
Bethany E Keenan ◽  
Chantelle Lachance ◽  
Lambert Felix ◽  
James P Raftery ◽  
...  

Abstract Falls in hospitals and care homes are a major issue of international concern. Falls cost the US $34 billion a year, with injurious falls being particularly life-limiting and costly. Shock-absorbing flooring decreases the stiffness of the ground surface to reduce the impact of a fall. There is a growing body of evidence on flooring for fall-related injury prevention, however no systematic review exists to inform practice. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of shock-absorbing flooring use for fall-related injury prevention in care settings. We searched six databases, clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, theses/dissertations, websites, reference lists, conducted forward citation searches, and liaised with experts in the field. We conducted study selection, data collection, and critical appraisal independently in duplicate. We evaluated the influence of shock-absorbing flooring on fall-related injuries, falls, and staff work-related injuries. We adopted a mixed methods approach considering evidence from randomised, non-randomised, economic, qualitative, and implementation studies. We assessed and reported the quality of outcomes using the GRADE approach and Summary of Findings Tables. This review, conducted over the course of 2019, summarises the certainty of the evidence on whether and which shock-absorbing floors influence injuries from falls, the chance of someone falling over, and work-related injuries in staff (e.g. from manoeuvring equipment across softer floors). Our findings are applicable to health and social care professionals, buildings and facilities managers, carers, older adults, architects, and designers. Funded by National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment (ref 17/148/11); registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019118834).


Author(s):  
Ballesteros JM ◽  
◽  
Struijk E ◽  
Machado-Fragua MD ◽  
Ortolá R ◽  
...  

Background: Added sugar intake is a key contributor to the development of several chronic diseases. We aimed to investigate the prospective association between added sugar intake and the risk of falling among older men and women. Methods: We analyzed data from 2,154 Spanish adults aged ≥65 years from the Seniors-ENRICA cohort. Baseline food consumption was collected in 2008-2010 with a validated diet history, in which 155 foods were identified to contain added sugar. The occurrence of falls was ascertained up to 2015. Analyses were conducted with Cox models adjusted for potential confounders, including nutritional status, chronic diseases and sleeping medication. Results: Over 7.2y of follow-up, 605 participants experienced ≥1 fall and 527 suffered injurious falls. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for ≥1 fall across quintiles of added sugar intake were: 1.0, 1.09 (0.83-1.42), 1.07 (0.82-1.40), 1.15 (0.88-1.52), and 1.48 (1.12-1.96); p-trend 0.03. The corresponding figures for injurious falls were: 1.0, 1.17 (0.88-1.56), 1.06 (0.79- 1.41), 1.13 (0.84-1.52), and 1.40 (1.03-1.90); p-trend 0.10. These associations did not vary over strata of age, protein, calcium or vitamin intake, diet quality, physical activity or alcohol consumption. No differences were found when solid and liquid sources of added sugars were examined separately. Conclusions: Intake of added sugars was associated with a higher risk of falling in older people. This adds to the evidence to support interventions to reduce added sugar intake.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 784-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saija Karinkanta ◽  
Pekka Kannus ◽  
Kirsti Uusi-Rasi ◽  
Ari Heinonen ◽  
Harri Sievänen

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stina Ek ◽  
Debora Rizzuto ◽  
Laura Fratiglioni ◽  
Kristina Johnell ◽  
Weili Xu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alan Murray

The media and sections of the public have shown recently an acute interest in Pipeline operational performance incident statistics. Published data for North America shows that 99.999% of crude oil and petroleum products shipped by pipelines reach their destination safely. Some pipeline operators claim even better performance, 99.9996 % being one example. However, should failing to deliver 4 barrels of product for every million shipped be a legitimate cause for concern? If not how about the more general case of 1 per one hundred thousand? Is pipeline performance being singled out unreasonably when compared to other threats to public and environmental wellbeing such as medical malpractice or industrial waste contamination? Evidence from Canada and elsewhere, indicates that, during their hospital stay, an appreciable number of patients, one in every 18, experience adverse events, such as medication error, injurious falls, infections, and other medical misadventures. Errors (mostly minor), in fulfilling pharmaceutical prescriptions show an even higher error rate — 1 in 4 in one recent study, yet the public appears to be unperturbed. A common thread is determining what constitutes an acceptable level of risk whether individual or societal, voluntary or involuntary. Besides providing a broader context for pipeline risk, the paper explores the origin and intent of the environmental screening standard of 1 in 10−6, as well as the concept of setting risk tolerance to be as low as reasonably practicable — ALARP. The question of why there may be a reticence for many Pipeline Regulators to set, as other industries have, a prescriptive value for ALARP is considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1303-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
LORETTA DIPIETRO ◽  
WAYNE W. CAMPBELL ◽  
DAVID M. BUCHNER ◽  
KIRK I. ERICKSON ◽  
KENNETH E. POWELL ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S622-S622
Author(s):  
Yurun Cai ◽  
Suzanne Leveille ◽  
Ling Shi ◽  
Tongjian You ◽  
Ping Chen

Abstract Fall injuries are a leading cause of death among older adults, and chronic pain has been identified as a fall risk factor. However, the potential impact of chronic pain on injurious falls is unknown. This prospective study examined the relation between chronic pain and injurious falls in a 4-year follow-up of community-dwelling older adults. The MOBILIZE Boston study recruited 765 older adults aged ≥70y living in the Boston area. Pain characteristics, including pain severity, pain interference, and pain location, were measured at baseline using the Brief Pain Inventory subscales and a joint pain questionnaire. Musculoskeletal pain distribution was categorized as “no pain”, “single site pain”, or “multisite pain”. Injurious falls were ascertained in telephone interviews following reports of falls on the monthly fall calendar postcards. The overall rate of injurious falls was 35/100 person-years. Negative binomial models, adjusting for sociodemographics, BMI, chronic conditions, mobility difficulty, analgesic and psychiatric medications, and depression, showed that pain interference and pain distribution, but not pain severity, independently predicted injurious falls. Participants in the highest third of pain interference scores had a 53% greater risk of injurious falls compared to those in the lowest pain interference group (adj.IRR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.05). Older adults with multisite pain had a 50% higher risk of injurious falls than those without pain (adj.IRR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.93). Risk of injurious falls related to pain was stronger among women than men. Research is needed to determine effective strategies to prevent fall injuries among older adults with chronic pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document