Breast Reduction Surgery and Breast Cancer Risk: Does Reduction Mammaplasty Have a Role in Primary Prevention Strategies for Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer?

2004 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 2104-2110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Tarone ◽  
Loren Lipworth ◽  
V. Leroy Young ◽  
Joseph K. McLaughlin
Author(s):  
Katherine D. Crew

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the United States, and the primary prevention of this disease is a major public health issue. Because there are relatively few modifiable breast cancer risk factors, pharmacologic interventions with antiestrogens have the potential to significantly affect the primary prevention setting. Breast cancer chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) tamoxifen and raloxifene, and with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) exemestane and anastrozole, is underutilized despite several randomized controlled trials demonstrating up to a 50% to 65% relative risk reduction in breast cancer incidence among women at high risk. An estimated 10 million women in the United States meet high-risk criteria for breast cancer and are potentially eligible for chemoprevention, but less than 5% of women at high risk who are offered antiestrogens for primary prevention agree to take it. Reasons for low chemoprevention uptake include lack of routine breast cancer risk assessment in primary care, inadequate time for counseling, insufficient knowledge about antiestrogens among patients and providers, and concerns about side effects. Interventions designed to increase chemoprevention uptake, such as decision aids and incorporating breast cancer risk assessment into clinical practice, have met with limited success. Clinicians can help women make informed decisions about chemoprevention by effectively communicating breast cancer risk and enhancing knowledge about the risks and benefits of antiestrogens. Widespread adoption of chemoprevention will require a major paradigm shift in clinical practice for primary care providers (PCPs). However, enhancing uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention holds promise for reducing the public health burden of this disease.


Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Albert Niepel ◽  
Sven Schwake ◽  
Mira Zeichmann ◽  
Ariel Noltze ◽  
Viktoria König ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Breast reduction surgery is one of the most frequently performed surgeries amongst plastic and reconstructive surgeons worldwide. Previous studies have shown decreased risk of breast cancer development in women undergoing breast reduction surgery of up to 28%. We aimed to evaluate the relative risk of breast cancer development in our patients after breast reduction surgery in relation to the general female population of Austria. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 637 women underwent breast reduction surgery between 2003 and 2017 at our department. From those women, 513 patients completed a follow-up assessment of breast cancer development and were included into the study sample. The age-specific incidence rate data of the general female population of Austria served as the control group and basis for the calculation of the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and Poisson test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Relative to 5.66 expected cases of breast cancer, our cohort showed 1 subject with breast cancer after breast reduction surgery (SIR = 0.1765). An exact Poisson test was carried out to determine the level of significance of the difference between the incidence rate observed in the sample compared to the expected rate based on the age-specific incidence rates of the general population (<i>p</i> = 0.023, <i>α</i> = 0.05). <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Our study underlines the strong evidence of previous studies for significant breast cancer reduction in patients after reductive mammoplasty. In comparison to the general female population of Austria, our cohort showed a reduction in breast cancer incidence of about 82%. The authors believe that different techniques in reduction mammoplasty have different levels of safety regarding the prevention and risk reduction for breast cancer. Further investigation must be conducted to evaluate the reduction of breast cancer risk with different surgical techniques.


1999 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1674-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell H. Brown ◽  
Michael Weinberg ◽  
Nelson Chong ◽  
Ron Levine ◽  
Eric Holowaty

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. S87
Author(s):  
Angela R. Bradbury ◽  
Linda Patrick-Miller ◽  
Brian Egleston ◽  
Lisa Schwartz ◽  
Lisa Tuchman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (578) ◽  
pp. eaba4373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Yala ◽  
Peter G. Mikhael ◽  
Fredrik Strand ◽  
Gigin Lin ◽  
Kevin Smith ◽  
...  

Improved breast cancer risk models enable targeted screening strategies that achieve earlier detection and less screening harm than existing guidelines. To bring deep learning risk models to clinical practice, we need to further refine their accuracy, validate them across diverse populations, and demonstrate their potential to improve clinical workflows. We developed Mirai, a mammography-based deep learning model designed to predict risk at multiple timepoints, leverage potentially missing risk factor information, and produce predictions that are consistent across mammography machines. Mirai was trained on a large dataset from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in the United States and tested on held-out test sets from MGH, Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) in Taiwan, obtaining C-indices of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.80), 0.81 (0.79 to 0.82), and 0.79 (0.79 to 0.83), respectively. Mirai obtained significantly higher 5-year ROC AUCs than the Tyrer-Cuzick model (P < 0.001) and prior deep learning models Hybrid DL (P < 0.001) and Image-Only DL (P < 0.001), trained on the same dataset. Mirai more accurately identified high-risk patients than prior methods across all datasets. On the MGH test set, 41.5% (34.4 to 48.5) of patients who would develop cancer within 5 years were identified as high risk, compared with 36.1% (29.1 to 42.9) by Hybrid DL (P = 0.02) and 22.9% (15.9 to 29.6) by the Tyrer-Cuzick model (P < 0.001).


Author(s):  
Cheng Peng ◽  
Chi Gao ◽  
Donghao Lu ◽  
Bernard A Rosner ◽  
Oana Zeleznik ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Carotenoids represent 1 of few modifiable factors to reduce breast cancer risk. Elucidation of interactions between circulating carotenoids and genetic predispositions or mammographic density (MD) may help inform more effective primary preventive strategies in high-risk populations. Objectives We tested whether women at high risk for breast cancer due to genetic predispositions or high MD would experience meaningful and greater risk reduction from higher circulating levels of carotenoids in a nested case-control study in the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS and NHSII). Methods This study included 1919 cases and 1695 controls in a nested case-control study in the NHS and NHSII. We assessed both multiplicative and additive interactions. RR reductions and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regressions, adjusting for matching factors and breast cancer risk factors. Absolute risk reductions (ARR) were calculated based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence rates. Results We showed that compared with women at low genetic risk or low MD, those with higher genetic risk scores or high MD had greater ARRs for breast cancer as circulating carotenoid levels increase (additive P-interaction = 0.05). Among women with a high polygenic risk score, those in the highest quartile of circulating carotenoids had a significant ARR (28.6%; 95% CI, 14.8–42.1%) compared to those in the lowest quartile of carotenoids. For women with a high percentage MD (≥50%), circulating carotenoids were associated with a 37.1% ARR (95% CI, 21.7–52.1%) when comparing the highest to the lowest quartiles of circulating carotenoids. Conclusions The inverse associations between circulating carotenoids and breast cancer risk appeared to be more pronounced in high-risk women, as defined by germline genetic makeup or MD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document