Catheter Taping Methods—Single-Layer Versus Reinforced Double-Layer Technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-130
Author(s):  
Jeremy H. Tsui ◽  
Luke W. Murtha ◽  
Ban Chi-ho Tsui
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Layer Technique

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Single Layer Versus Double layer Intestinal Anastomosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar Gurung ◽  
Santosh Shrestha ◽  
Devendra Shrestha ◽  
Suresh Raj Paudel ◽  
David Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Regional Hospital ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Layer Technique ◽  
Postoperative Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Western Regional

Objective: To determine the efficacy of single layer intestinal anastomosis to double layer technique in terms of anastomotic healing. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis in the Department of Surgery, Western Regional Hospital from June 2014 to May 2016 were taken for this comparative study and divided equally in two groups, 25 each (single layer and double layer). Results: Of the total fifty cases, twenty-five cases included in each group, there was no leakage in single layer group while 1 patient had leakage in double layer group which was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Single layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis is simple to carry out and is as efficacious as double layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative anastomotic leak.

Single layer versus double layer suture for anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Sanabria ◽  
Gabriel Gomez ◽  
Eduardo Valdivieso ◽  
C Bermudez
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus

Single layer versus double layer suture for anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Sanabria ◽  
Gabriel Gomez ◽  
Eduardo Valdivieso ◽  
C Bermudez
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus

scholarly journals Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Guadagni ◽  
Matteo Palmeri ◽  
Matteo Bianchini ◽  
Desirée Gianardi ◽  
Niccolò Furbetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
Technical Details ◽  
Robotic Right Colectomy ◽  
Mechanical Anastomosis

Abstract Purpose Robotic assistance could increase the rate of ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis (ICA) during robotic right colectomy (RRC). However, although robotic ICA can be accomplished with several different technical variants, it is not clear whether some of these technical details should be preferred. An evaluation of the possible advantage of one respect to another would be useful. Methods We conducted a systematic review of literature on technical details of robotic ileo-colic ICA, from which we performed a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. The extracted data allowed a comparative analysis regarding the outcome of overall complication (OC), bleeding rate (BR) and leakage rate (LR), between (1) mechanical anastomosis with robotic stapler, versus laparoscopic stapler, versus totally hand-sewn anastomosis and (2) closure of enterocolotomy with manual double layer, versus single layer, versus stapled. Results A total of 30 studies including 2066 patients were selected. Globally, the side-to-side, isoperistaltic anastomosis, realized with laparoscopic staplers, and double-layer closure for enterocolotomy, is the most common technique used. According to the meta-analysis, the use of robotic stapler was significantly associated with a reduction of the BR with respect to mechanical anastomosis with laparoscopic stapler or totally hand-sewn anastomosis. None of the other technical aspects significantly influenced the outcomes. Conclusions ICA fashioning during RRC can be accomplished with several technical variants without evidence of a clear superiority of anyone of these techniques. Although the use of robotic staplers could be associated with some benefits, further studies are necessary to draw conclusions.

scholarly journals Study of clinical outcome of patients undergoing intestinal anastomoses with single layer extramucosal technique and double layer anastomoses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind Rai ◽  
Sukantth R. J.
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Intestinal Anastomoses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

 Background: Intestinal anastomosis is one of the common surgeries for cases like bowel obstruction, incarcerated hernias, benign and malignant tumours of small and large bowel. The ideal intestinal anastomosis does not leak and allow normal function of the gastrointestinal tract. This study compared single layer versus double layer  intestinal anastomosis in terms of duration, postoperative complications like anastomotic leak.Methods: A total of 100 patients admitted in Hamidia hospital, based on history and clinical examinations and radiological examinations, placed in two groups, group A (single layer anastomosis) and group B (double layer anastomosis) and were operated by a qualified surgical specialist. Data analysis of anastomotic time, anastomotic leak was done and statistical tests of significance were applied. A p value less than 0.05 is considered as significant.Results: In group A (single layer) the time required to perform in 30 (60%) patients is between 16-20 minutes. In double layer, maximum were done in between 26 to 30 minutes, 32 (64%). In our study of 100 patients, there were 6 anastomotic leaks, of which four of them were in group A (single layer) and 2 of them in group B (double layer).Conclusions: In our study, the duration required to perform a single layer intestinal anastomosis is significantly lesser when compared to double layer. There is no significant difference in anastomotic leak between two groups. Less time with no difference in complications, a move towards single layer anastomosis should be preferred.

scholarly journals Single Layer Versus Double Layer Anastomosis of Small Intestine – A Comparative Study from Karnataka, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (30) ◽  
pp. 2300-2304
Author(s):  
Tejaswini Murari Pawar ◽  
Ravikiran Hosur Ramamurthy ◽  
Shashirekha Chikkavenkataswamy Anjaneyulu
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Layer Technique

BACKGROUND Intestinal anastomosis is an operative procedure that is of importance in the practice of surgery. It is a very commonly performed technique in today’s surgical era. We wanted to study the postoperative complications like anastomotic leak and abscess formation and duration of hospital stay in single layer and double layer anastomosis and compare the same. METHODS In our prospective observational study, 80 patients were reviewed and were divided into 2 groups. Cases were allotted to either group based on the odd even method requiring single- and double-layer anastomosis, odd being single layer and even being double layer anastomosis. Intestinal anastomosis was carried out in single layer technique with delayed absorbable suture material and double layer technique with inner transmural layer with delayed absorbable suture material and seromuscular layer with non-absorbable suture material. RESULTS Each group had 40 patients, there was significant difference noted between the groups. Mean duration of hospital stay in single layer group was 17.85 ± 7.62 days and in double layer group was 26.20 ± 16.12 days (P = 0.043 *). In single group, mean time taken for anastomosis was 18.50 ± 1.73 and in double group was 29.05 ± 2.19. There was significant difference in time taken between two groups (P < 0.001). In single group, majority of subjects had no anastomotic Leak (95 %) and 5 % had leak. In double group 70 % had no leak and 30 % had leak. P value was statistically significant (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Single layer anastomosis was better in terms of duration of hospital stay, postoperative anastomotic leaks and time taken for anastomosis. KEY WORDS Single Layer, Double Layer, Small Bowel, Duration of Hospital Stay, Anastomotic Leaks

Photovoltaic Devices with an Active Layer from a Stamping Transfer Technique: Single Layer Versus Double Layer

Langmuir ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 9584-9588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hwan Wang ◽  
Dae-Geun Choi ◽  
Ki-Joong Lee ◽  
O Ok Park ◽  
Jong Hyeok Park
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Active Layer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Photovoltaic Devices
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document