scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Stocking Dantrolene in Ambulatory Surgery Centers for the Treatment of Malignant Hyperthermia

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1333-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiwo Aderibigbe ◽  
Barbara H. Lang ◽  
Henry Rosenberg ◽  
Qixuan Chen ◽  
Guohua Li
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Malignant Hyperthermia ◽  
Ambulatory Surgery ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Ambulatory Surgery Centers ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare hypermetabolic syndrome of the skeletal muscle and a potentially fatal complication of general anesthesia. Dantrolene is currently the only specific treatment for MH. The Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States has issued guidelines recommending that 36 vials (20 mg per vial) of dantrolene remain in stock at every surgery center. However, the cost of stocking dantrolene in ambulatory surgery centers has been a concern. The purpose of this analysis is to assess the cost-effectiveness of stocking dantrolene in ambulatory surgery centers as recommended by the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States. Methods: A decision tree model was used to compare treatment with dantrolene to a supportive care-only strategy. Model assumptions include the incidence of MH, MH case fatality with dantrolene treatment and with supportive care-only. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the estimated cost-effectiveness. Results: The estimated annual number of MH events in ambulatory surgery centers in the United States was 47. The incremental effectiveness of dantrolene compared with supportive care was 33 more lives saved per year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $196,320 (in 2010 dollars) per life saved compared with a supportive care strategy. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust for the plausible range of all variables and assumptions tested. Conclusion: The results of this analysis suggest that stocking dantrolene for the treatment of MH in ambulatory surgery centers as recommended by the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States is cost-effective when compared with the estimated values of statistical life used by U.S. regulatory agencies.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuezhi Hao ◽  
Aizong Shen ◽  
Bin Wu
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Cost

Purpose: The effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated. Decisions have to be made about allocating healthcare resources. Economic evidence could support policy decisions to fund expensive interventions. The current analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC harboring no EGFR or ALK mutations. It is set in the context of the US and China, representing developed and resource-constrained settings, respectively.Patients and Methods: A Markov model consisting of three discrete health states was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy. The key clinical data were derived from the CheckMate-227 trial, and the cost and health preference data were derived from the literature. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental net health benefits (INHBs) were calculated for the two strategies. Subgroup, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: In the United States, nivolumab plus ipilimumab increased by 1.260 QALYs with an additional cost of $95,617 compared with the features of chemotherapy, which led to an ICER of $75,871 per QALY gained. INHB indicated that nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment had a 99% probability of being cost-effective at the ICER threshold of $100,000/QALY in all subgroups. The results of sensitivity analyses revealed that the model outcomes were robust. In China, the ICER of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. chemotherapy was $59,773/QALY, and the INHB was -1.972 QALY at the threshold of $27,351/QALY.Conclusion: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment is a cost-effective option compared with chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring no EGFR or ALK mutations in the United States. However, nivolumab plus ipilimumab is not a preferred option in China.

Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity in the United States

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh J. Carlson ◽  
Ryan N. Hansen ◽  
Roger R. Dmochowski ◽  
Denise R. Globe ◽  
Danielle C. Colayco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Detrusor Overactivity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals The Cost-Effectiveness of Epilepsy Surgery and Surgical Evaluation in the United States

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shehryar R Sheikh ◽  
Michael P Steinmetz ◽  
Michael W Kattan ◽  
Mendel Singer ◽  
Belinda Udeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Epilepsy Surgery ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Surgical Evaluation ◽  
The Cost

Abstract INTRODUCTION Surgery is an effective treatment for many pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients, but incurs considerable cost. It is unknown whether surgery and surgical evaluation are cost-effective strategies in the United States. We aim to evaluate whether 1) surgery is cost-effective for patients who have been deemed surgical candidates when compared to continued medical management, 2) surgical evaluation is cost-effective for patients who have drug-resistant temporal epilepsy and may or may not ultimately be deemed surgical candidates METHODS We use a Monte Carlo simulation method to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgery and surgical evaluation over a lifetime horizon. Patients transition between two health states (‘seizure free’ and ‘having seizures’) as part of a Markov process, based on literature estimates. We adopt both healthcare and societal perspectives, including direct healthcare costs and indirect costs such as lost earnings by patients and care providers. We estimate variability of model predictions using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS 1) Epilepsy surgery is cost effective in surgically eligible patients by virtue of being cost saving and more effective than medical management in the long run, with 95% of 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations favoring surgery. From a societal perspective, surgery becomes cost effective within 3 yr. At 5 yr, surgery has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $31,600, which is significantly below the societal willingness-to-pay (∼ $100,000/quality-adjusted life years (QALY)) and comparable to hip/knee arthroplasty. 2) Surgical evaluation is cost-effective in pharmacoresistant patients even if the probability of being deemed a surgical candidate is low (5%-10%). Even if the probability of surgical eligibility is only 10%, surgical referral has an ICER of $96,000/QALY, which is below societal willingness-to-pay. CONCLUSION Epilepsy surgery and surgical evaluation are both cost-effective strategies in the United States. Pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients should be referred for surgical evaluation without hesitation on cost-effectiveness grounds.

scholarly journals 2158. Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of a Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S732-S732
Author(s):  
James Karichu ◽  
Mindy Cheng ◽  
Joanna Sickler ◽  
Julie Munakata ◽  
S Pinar Bilir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
The United States ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Group A

Abstract Background Group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is common in the United States (US). Each year, approximately 12 million people seek medical care for pharyngitis, accounting for ~2% of ambulatory care visits. The gold standard method for diagnosing GAS is culture. However, because culture is time intensive, rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs), with or without culture confirmation, are commonly used. Although RADTs provide results quickly, test sensitivity has been shown to be sub-optimal, which can lead to inappropriate treatment decisions. Recently, highly sensitive point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (POC NAAT), such as the cobas® Liat® System, have emerged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) and budget impact (BI) of adopting POC NAAT compared with RADT+culture confirmation to diagnose GAS pharyngitis from the US third-party payer perspective. Methods A decision-tree economic model was developed in Microsoft Excel to quantify costs and clinical outcomes associated with POC NAAT and RADT+culture over a one-year period. All model inputs were derived from published literature and public databases. Model outputs included costs and clinical effects measured as quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) lost. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of uncertainty on results. Results CE analysis showed that POC NAAT would cost $44 per patient compared with $78 with RADT+ culture. POC NAAT was associated with fewer QALDs lost relative to RADT+ culture. Therefore, POC NAAT may be considered the “dominant” strategy (i.e., lower costs and higher effectiveness). Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. BI analysis showed that adopting POC NAAT for diagnosis of GAS could yield cost-savings of 0.3% vs. current budget over 3 years. This is due to savings associated with testing, GAS-related complications, antibiotic treatment and treatment-associated complication costs. Conclusion Results suggest that adopting POC NAAT to diagnose GAS would be considered cost-effective and yield cost-savings for US payers relative to RADT+culture. Access to POC NAAT would be important to optimize appropriate GAS diagnosis and treatment decisions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine maintenance therapy for opiate addiction in the United States

Addiction ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 1267-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Barnett ◽  
Gregory S. Zaric ◽  
Margaret L. Brandeau
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opiate Addiction ◽  
The Cost
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document