Abstract
Objective
To study the differential diagnosis of MPLC and IM by detecting the different lesions of the same patient. To explore the differences in prognosis between MPLC and IM, and to explore the factors affecting the prognosis of multi-focal lung cancer.
Methods
Fifty patients with multi-focal lung cancer were screened, and the relevant clinical information was noted; the patients were diagnosed by ACCP standard. Mutations of the lesions were detected by ARMS-PCR, and the detected genes included EGFR, ALK, ROS1, MET, KRAS, RET, HER-2, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA. The results of genetic testing were compared with those of ACCP standard diagnosis.
Results
We analyzed a total of 101 tumors from 50 patients. Classification based on gene testing contradicted the clinicopathologic diagnosis in 10 (20%) of the comparisons, identifying independent primaries in 6 cases diagnosed as metastasis and metastases in 4 cases diagnosed as independent primaries. Another 7(14%) tumor pairings were assigned an “equivocal” result based on gene testing. The results of gene testing of the remaining 33(66%) tumor pairings were consistent with the clinicopathologic diagnosis. The mutant heat map indicated that IM patients have a higher rate of mutation consistency than MPLC patients.
Conclusion
Multi-gene detection of multi-focal lung cancer has a certain auxiliary effect on the differential diagnosis of MPLC and IM, which can complement the clinical standards, but also has some limitations.