scholarly journals What Patient-related Factors are Associated with an Increased Risk of Surgery in Patients with Stenosing Tenosynovitis? A Prospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 477 (8) ◽  
pp. 1879-1888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Sobel ◽  
Adam E.M. Eltorai ◽  
Barrett Weiss ◽  
P. Kaveh Mansuripur ◽  
Arnold-Peter C. Weiss
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapir Anani ◽  
Gal Goldhaber ◽  
Adi Brom ◽  
Nir Lasman ◽  
Natia Turpashvili ◽  
...  

Background: Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with frequent hospitalizations and poor clinical outcomes in geriatric patients. Ascertaining this association for younger patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments could help better prognosticate patients in the realm of internal medicine. Methods: During a 1-year prospective study in an internal medicine department, we evaluated patients upon admission for sarcopenia and frailty. We used the FRAIL questionnaire, blood alanine-amino transferase (ALT) activity, and mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) measurements. Results: We recruited 980 consecutive patients upon hospital admission (median age 72 years (IQR 65–79); 56.8% males). According to the FRAIL questionnaire, 106 (10.8%) patients were robust, 368 (37.5%) pre-frail, and 506 (51.7%) were frail. The median ALT value was 19IU/L (IQR 14–28). The median MAMC value was 27.8 (IQR 25.7–30.2). Patients with low ALT activity level (<17IU/L) were frailer according to their FRAIL score (3 (IQR 2–4) vs. 2 (IQR 1–3); p < 0.001). Higher MAMC values were associated with higher ALT activity, both representing robustness. The rate of 30 days readmission in the whole cohort was 17.4%. Frail patients, according to the FRAIL score (FS), had a higher risk for 30 days readmission (for FS > 2, HR = 1.99; 95CI = 1.29–3.08; p = 0.002). Frail patients, according to low ALT activity, also had a significantly higher risk for 30 days readmission (HR = 2.22; 95CI = 1.26–3.91; p = 0.006). After excluding patients whose length of stay (LOS) was ≥10 days, 252 (27.5%) stayed in-hospital for 4 days or longer. Frail patients according to FS had a higher risk for LOS ≥4 days (for FS > 2, HR = 1.87; 95CI = 1.39–2.52; p < 0.001). Frail patients, according to low ALT activity, were also at higher risk for LOS ≥4 days (HR = 1.87; 95CI = 1.39–2.52; p < 0.001). MAMC values were not correlated with patients’ LOS or risk for re-admission. Conclusion: Frailty and sarcopenia upon admission to internal medicine departments are associated with longer hospitalization and increased risk for re-admission.


The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 366 (9492) ◽  
pp. 1182-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald H Gray ◽  
Xianbin Li ◽  
Godfrey Kigozi ◽  
David Serwadda ◽  
Heena Brahmbhatt ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Pintip Chitphakdithai ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Steven C. Goldstein ◽  
John E. Levine ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1107 Although PBSC has replaced BM as the most common unrelated donor stem cell product collected, a direct comparison of the PBSC vs. BM donation experiences has not been performed. We report a prospective study of 2726 BM and 6768 PBSC donors who underwent BM harvest at 83 centers or PBSC collection at 98 centers between January 2004 and July 2009. 340 donors who were randomized between PBSC and BM donation in a prospective clinical trial were excluded from this analysis. The proportions of donors of BM or PBSC were similar in regards to gender, race/ethnicity, age, body mass index (BMI), and year of donation. PBSC donors were collected using a median dose of 10 micrograms/kg/day of filgrastim for 5–6 days with 1–2 days of collection. Pain and toxicities were assessed using the common toxicity criteria (CTC) at baseline, daily during G-CSF administration and PBSC collection and within 48 hours of the bone marrow harvest. Peak levels of pain and toxicities of PBSC and BM donors were compared through the early collection period and at one week and one month after the procedure. Donors were followed weekly until they reported complete recovery. While the incidence of pain (80-90%) and common toxicities such as fatigue, insomnia, anorexia, nausea, dizziness, and site reactions (10-80%), was similar for both procedures, there were notable differences between donor experiences by type of donation. PBSC donors were at significantly increased risk of moderate, severe, and intolerable pain as well as ≥ grade 2 CTC toxicities during the peri-collection period (see table). In contrast, BM donors were more likely to experience ≥ grade 2 toxicities at 1 week after the procedure and moderate to severe pain at 1 week and one month, although these complaints were rare in both groups. BM donors reported a slower time to complete recovery compared to PBSC donors, with 3% of BM donors still not fully recovered at 24 weeks, while 100% of PBSC donors had recovered (see Figure). Unique aspects of BM donation included an overnight stay in 37% of donors (almost always routine) and a low risk (<1%) of requiring an allogeneic blood transfusion. PBSC donors experienced symptoms of hypocalcemia 45% of the time, and 11% required central line placement. In addition to risks associated with stem cell source donated, multivariate analysis showed that female gender, obesity, and increased age were associated with significantly increased risk of toxicity or pain. In summary, while the large majority of donors of BM and PBSC experience only mild to moderate symptoms and recover within a few weeks, PBSC donors experience more pain and toxicities in the early peri-donation period, while BM donors are more likely to experience discomfort for several weeks after the harvest, with a small fraction having persistent symptoms at 6 months. Women, obese, and older donors experience more pain and toxicity with the donation process independent of stem cell source donated. Prospective unrelated donors should be informed of the different risk profiles associated with BM vs. PBSC donation in order to assist them in making an informed decision. OR indicates odds ratio Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 951-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Purdue ◽  
Jonathan N. Hofmann ◽  
Troy J. Kemp ◽  
Anil K. Chaturvedi ◽  
Qing Lan ◽  
...  

Key Points Elevated levels of BCA-1, sTNFR2, and sVEGFR2 are associated with increased risk for NHL several years after blood collection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2221
Author(s):  
Yogesh Kumar Bung ◽  
Chandrasekhar Sharanappa Neeralagi ◽  
Lakkanna Suggaiah ◽  
Usharani Rathnam ◽  
Chandrakant Kesari

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is as an inflammation of the pancreas with varied range of complication like peri-pancreatic collection, pancreatic necrosis, renal failure, multi-organ dysfunction syndrome which increases mortality rate and morbidity. Majority of AP cases are mild but severe cases of AP are associated with increased complication and mortality. BISAP is simple bedside prognostic scoring system for predicting severity of AP. BISAP is a collection of simple routine investigation and scores are quantified at 24hours of onset of AP. This study aims to assess prognosis of AP cases at ESIC Medical college and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.Methods: A prospective study of 60 Patients who were diagnosed as AP according to RAC. All patients were admitted in high dependency unit with close observation of vital parameters and investigations were done at 24 hours of onset of AP. BISAP score >3 was considered as Severe Acute Pancreatitis, its correlation with local complications, organ failure, ICU stay and Mortality was studied. Statistical analysis done using Chi-square test and Fisher Exact test for local complications and organ failure using xL Stat and SPSS v.21.0, a p-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.Results: Of the 60 patients, BISAP score was >3 and <3 in 15 and 45 patients respectively. Alcohol was the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for 53.33%. In current study 12 (20%) patients developed organ failure and among them 9 (75%) had transient organ failure and 3 (25%) had persistent organ failure. Total 8 (13%) patients had developed pancreatic necrosis and among them 6 had BISAP >3. Mortality rate in this study was 2%.Conclusions: The BISAP score is a simple and fairly accurate method for the early identification of patients at increased risk for in hospital mortality and to identify patients at risk of the development of intermediate markers of severity and organ failure within 24 hours of presentation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3088
Author(s):  
Sanjay Jain ◽  
Rahul Shivhare ◽  
Shoranki Pardhan ◽  
Deepti Chaurasiya

Background: Surgical site infections have plagued surgeons since time immemorial. There is significant morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections. In this study we tried to identify the incidence, various patient and procedure related factors, which could have led to SSIs, the various organism associated with the SSIs and their pattern of sensitivity and resistance to various antibiotics.Methods: This study was conducted in the department of general surgery, Gandhi medical college and Hamidia hospital Bhopal. In this prospective study, we included all patients more than 12 years of age undergoing abdominal surgeries between 2018-2020. Patient data was recorded in a case recording form and all patients were examined post-operatively for soakage along with culture and antibiotic testing.Results: A total of 299 patients were included. Overall incidence of SSI was 23.07%, elective surgeries showed 19.5% incidence and elective showed 26.08% incidence. Higher incidence of SSI was found in, male patients (25.9%), contaminated and dirty surgeries, higher ASA scores, smokers, alcoholics diabetics, anaemics, and malnourished patients. E. coli and klebsiella were the most common organisms isolated in both elective and emergency setting. Organisms isolated were highly sensitive to colistin, meropenem, imipenem, gentamicin and amikacin. Amoxycillin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline were fairly resistant in the current study.Conclusions: Modifiable risk factors like smoking, alcoholism, anaemia, malnourishment, contaminated wound class and emergency surgeries should be addressed systematically along with judicious use of antibiotics and tailoring then according to culture profile whenever possible is needed to reduce SSI rate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-267
Author(s):  
Renata Turek-Jabrocka ◽  
Krystyna Szafraniec ◽  
Dorota Pach ◽  
Beata Piwońska-Solska ◽  
Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Czarnecki ◽  
Tina Sutton ◽  
C. Czarnecki ◽  
G. Culjak

Background and Objective: To determine the incidence of new skin cancer formation in people who have had a nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) removed. Methods: A prospective study of Australian outpatients with histologically confirmed nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Results: Four hundred eighty-one patients were entered in the study and 300 were followed for at least 10 years. Another skin cancer developed in 67.8% and multiple skin cancers (three or more) in 51.8%. A logistical regression analysis found that the main risk factors for new skin cancer formation were male sex and if the patient had multiple skin cancers. A squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) developed in 36% during the study and a melanoma in 4.7% of men and 2.1% of women. Men who had a NMSC were 8 times more likely than the general population to develop a melanoma while women with NMSC were 4 times more likely. Three patients died of metastatic SCC and one of metastatic melanoma during the followup period. A multivariate analysis showed that multiple skin cancer formation was the main risk factor for SCC or melanoma formation. Conclusion: Patients with NMSC require careful followup as they have an increased risk of new cancer formation. Those with multiple skin cancer merit particularly careful followup as all develop another NMSC within 10 years and have a significantly increased risk of developing SCC or melanoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document