Preoperative Nutritional Scores as Host-Related Prognostic Factors for Both Overall Survival and Postoperative Complications in Stage II – III Colorectal Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Ahiko ◽  
Dai Shida ◽  
Yuya Nakamura ◽  
Jun Imaizumi ◽  
Yasuyuki Takamizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

scholarly journals PIK3CAandTP53mutations predict overall survival of stage II/III colorectal cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
A-Jian Li ◽  
Hua-Guang Li ◽  
Er-Jiang Tang ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Nomogram for predicting overall survival in colorectal cancer with distant metastasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Liu ◽  
Yao Xu ◽  
Guijun Xu ◽  
Vladimir P. Baklaushev ◽  
Vladimir P. Chekhonin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Iv Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cancer burden, and prognosis is determined by many demographic and clinicopathologic factors. The present study aimed to construct a prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer patients with distant metastasis. Methods Colorectal cancer patients with distant metastasis diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed to predict survival, and validation was performed. Results A total of 7099 stage IV colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the construction cohort. The median overall survival was 20.0 (95% CI 19.3–20.7) months. Age at diagnosis, marital status, race, primary tumour site, tumour grade, CEA level, T stage, N stage, presence of bone, brain, liver and lung metastasis, surgery for primary site and performance of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. The nomogram was constructed and the calibration curve showed satisfactory agreement. The C-index was 0.742 (95% CI 0.726–0.758). In the validation cohort (7098 patients), the nomogram showed satisfactory discrimination and calibration with a C-index of 0.746 (95% CI 0.730–0.762). Conclusion A series of factors associated with the survival of CRC patients with distant metastasis were found. Based on the identified factors, a nomogram was generated to predict the survival of stage IV colorectal cancer patients. The predictive model showed satisfactory discrimination and calibration, which can provide a reference for survival estimation and individualized treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Serum sE-selectin levels and carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA-expressing cells in peripheral blood as prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients

Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 2913-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Ferroni ◽  
Mario Roselli ◽  
Antonella Spila ◽  
Roberta D'Alessandro ◽  
Ilaria Portarena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Carcinoembryonic Antigen ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

scholarly journals A nomogram based on pretreatment levels of serum bilirubin and total bile acid levels predicts survival in colorectal cancer patients

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghao Cao ◽  
Shenghe Deng ◽  
Lizhao Yan ◽  
Junnan Gu ◽  
Jia Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bile Acid ◽  
Bile Acids ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Serum Bilirubin ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Total Bile Acid ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Serum bilirubin and total bile acid (TBA) levels have been reported to be strongly associated with the risk and prognosis of certain cancers. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of pretreatment levels of serum bilirubin and bile acids on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A retrospective cohort of 1474 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection between January 2015 and December 2017 was included in the study. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of pretreatment levels of bilirubin and bile acids. X-Tile software was used to identify optimal cut-off values for total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and TBA in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results DBIL, TBIL, and TBA were validated as significant prognostic factors by univariate Cox regression analysis for both 3-year OS and DFS. Multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that high DBIL, TBIL and TBA levels were independent prognostic factors for both OS (HR: 0.435, 95% CI: 0.299–0.637, P < 0.001; HR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.329–0.578, P < 0.001; HR: 0.206, 95% CI: 0.124–0.341, P < 0.001, respectively) and DFS (HR: 0.583, 95% CI: 0.391–0.871, P = 0.008; HR:0.437,95% CI: 0.292–0.655, P <0.001; HR: 0.634, 95% CI: 0.465–0.865, P = 0.004, respectively). In addition, nomograms for OS and DFS were established according to all significant factors, and the c-indexes were 0.819 (95% CI: 0.806–0.832) and 0.835 (95% CI: 0.822–0.849), respectively. Conclusions TBIL, DBIL and TBA levels are independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients. The nomograms based on OS and DFS can be used as a practical model for evaluating the prognosis of CRC patients.

scholarly journals Non‐invasive metastasis prognosis from plasma metabolites in stage II colorectal cancer patients: The DACHS study

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Zaimenko ◽  
Carsten Jaeger ◽  
Hermann Brenner ◽  
Jenny Chang‐Claude ◽  
Michael Hoffmeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Plasma Metabolites ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Preoperative Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels as a Prognostic Marker for Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. CGM.S7113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Kemik ◽  
Ahu Sarbay Kemik ◽  
Aziz Sümer ◽  
Sevim Purisa ◽  
A. Cumhur Dulger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Background The aim of the present study was to determine whether serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can provide prognostic information independent of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients undergoing curative surgery. Methods Serum samples were collected from 158 patients with colorectal cancer and from 100 controls. Serum and tissue levels of VEGF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum VEGF levels in colorectal cancer patients were compared with those in healthy controls, and we retrospectively assessed the association between serum VEGF levels and clinicopathologic findings and survival. Results VEGF expression was significantly higher in colorectal cancer tissue compared with nontumor tissue. Mean serum VEGF levels in patients were significantly higher than those in controls, and significantly higher in patients with large tumors, lymph node involvement, and distant metastases. Conclusion Elevated serum VEGF was significantly associated with poor survival, but was only an independent risk factor for poor survival in Stage II and/or III disease. Elevated serum VEGF is significantly associated with development of colorectal cancer, and lymph or distant invasive phenotypes and survival, especially in Stage II and III patients.

scholarly journals Higher titer hepatitis B core antibody predicts a higher risk of liver metastases and worse survival in patients with colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyao Li ◽  
Shaofei Li ◽  
Hangbo Tao ◽  
Yixiang Zhan ◽  
Kemin Ni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hepatic Metastasis ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background There have been controversial voices on if hepatitis B virus infection decreases the risk of colorectal liver metastases or not. This study aims to the find the association between HBV infection and postoperative survival of colorectal cancer and the risk of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients. Methods Patients who underwent curative surgical resection for colorectal cancer between January 2011 and December 2012 were included. Patients were grouped according to anti-HBc. Differences in overall survival, time to progress, and hepatic metastasis-free survival between groups and significant predictors were analyzed. Results Three hundred twenty-seven colorectal cancer patients were comprised of 202 anti-HBc negative cases and 125 anti-HBc positive cases, and anti-HBc positive cases were further divided into high-titer anti-HBc group (39) and low-titer anti-HBc group (86). The high-titer anti-HBc group had significantly worse overall survival (5-Yr, 65.45% vs. 80.06%; P < .001), time to progress (5-Yr, 44.26% vs. 84.73%; P < .001), and hepatic metastasis-free survival (5-Yr, 82.44% vs. 94.58%; P = .029) than the low-titer group. Multivariate model showed anti-HBc ≥ 8.8 S/CO was correlated with poor overall survival (HR, 3.510; 95% CI, 1.718–7.17; P < .001), time to progress (HR, 5.747; 95% CI, 2.789–11.842; P < .001), and hepatic metastasis-free survival (HR, 3.754; 95% CI, 1.054–13.369; P = .041) in the anti-HBc positive cases. Conclusions Higher titer anti-HBc predicts a potential higher risk of liver metastases and a worse survival in anti-HBc positive colorectal cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document