The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Node-Positive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augusto Pereira ◽  
Tirso Pérez-Medina ◽  
Javier F. Magrina ◽  
Paul M. Magtibay ◽  
Isabel Millan ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic role of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and positive nodes (stages IIIC and IV).MethodsRetrospective chart review. Data from all consecutive patients with EOC and positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes (stage IIIC and IV) in Mayo Clinic from 1996 to 2000 were included. To evaluate the impact of nodal metastases, the extent of lymphadenectomy was compared according to the number of nodes removed and positive nodes resected. Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for analysis.ResultsThe median number of nodes removed was 31 (pelvic, 21.5, and aortic, 10), and the median number of positive nodes was 5. The 5-year overall survival was 44.8%. On multivariate analysis, only the extent of peritoneal metastases before surgery was a significant factor for survival (P = 0.001 for stage IIIC and P = 0.004 for stage IV). Analysis of 83 patients with advanced peritoneal disease more than 2 cm demonstrated before debulking, removal of more than 40 lymph nodes was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; P = 0.032; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–0.35). In 29 patients with advanced peritoneal disease and no residual disease after debulking, removal of more than 10 positive was a factor for survival.ConclusionsThere was a survival benefit in patients with EOC with advanced peritoneal disease more than 2 cm before debulking when more than 40 lymph nodes were removed. There was an additional survival benefit in those patients with no residual disease after debulking when more than 10 positive nodes were removed.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16512-e16512
Author(s):  
V. Kolev ◽  
S. Mironov ◽  
O. Mironov ◽  
C. Moskowitz ◽  
N. M. Ishill ◽  
...  

e16512 Background: It has been hypothesized and shown in animal studies that the supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes serve as the principal nodes for lymphatic drainage of the entire peritoneal cavity. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of enlarged supra-diaphragmatic nodes noted on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients (pts) with FIGO stage III and IV EOC who had preoperative CT scans of the supradiaphragmatic region and primary cytoreductive surgery at our institution between 1997 and 2004. All scans were retrospectively reviewed by one board-certified radiologist (SM). To evaluate survival, Kaplan-Meier methods were used, with log rank Pvalues for comparisons. Results: A total of 212 eligible pts who underwent attempted primary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based systemic chemotherapy were identified for evaluation. With a median follow-up time of 52 mos, there were 135 deaths and a median overall survival of 48 mos (95% CI: 44–53). Of the 212 pts, 44 (21%) had supradiaphragmatic adenopathy with nodes >1 cm, while 168 (79%) did not have adenopathy in this distribution. None of the 44 pts with adenopathy had the enlarged nodes removed at primary cytoreduction. The median survival was 49 mos for pts with and 48 mos for patients without adenopathy (p = 0.46). In total, 155 (73%) patients underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual disease ≤ 1 cm). In the optimally cytoreduced pts, the median survival for the 125 pts without supradiaphragmatic adenopathy was 52 mos (95%CI: 45–59) compared to 51mos (95%CI: 41–58) for the 30 pts with supradiaphragmatic adenopathy (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Although a previous study has shown that supradiaphragmatic adenopathy was associated with poorer overall survival in EOC patients, our study did not confirm these findings. In our study, enlarged supradiaphragmatic nodes noted on preoperative CT scan did not have significant prognostic impact and therefore their clinical significance remains uncertain. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bonnefoi ◽  
R. P. A'Hern ◽  
C. Fisher ◽  
V. Macfarlane ◽  
D. Barton ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In this report we present the natural history, prognostic factors, and therapeutic implications of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 192 patients with stage IV EOC as defined in 1985 by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. RESULTS: The site of stage IV–defining disease was cytologically positive pleural effusion in 63 patients, liver in 50 patients, lymph nodes in 26 patients, lung in six patients, other sites in 15 patients, and disease at multiple stage IV–defining metastatic sites in 32 patients. Surgery was performed before chemotherapy in 169 patients; 25 patients (14.8%) were left with only microscopic residual disease or less than 2 cm of macroscopic residual disease. The overall response rate to chemotherapy was 56%; the complete response rate was 18%. The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, and the median overall survival was 13.4 months. The median overall survival of patients with positive pleural effusions only was 13.4 months as compared with 10.5 months for patients with visceral disease only, but this difference was not statistically significant. The 5-year survival rate was 7.6%, with only six patients surviving more than 5 years. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that two parameters were associated with a shorter survival time: visceral involvement (lung or liver) and diagnosis before 1984. CONCLUSION: Patients with stage IV EOC initially respond to chemotherapy as often as those with less advanced disease, but the long-term prognosis is very poor. The size of residual disease is not a prognostic factor in this group of patients, and, therefore, the role of debulking surgery in these patients needs to be reconsidered.


Oncotarget ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1085-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Ferreira ◽  
Rosimeire Aparecida Roela ◽  
Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez ◽  
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 888-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Koole ◽  
Ruby van Stein ◽  
Karolina Sikorska ◽  
Desmond Barton ◽  
Lewis Perrin ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery. The effect of HIPEC remains undetermined in patients who are candidates for primary cytoreductive surgery.Primary objectiveThe primary objective is to evaluate the effect of HIPEC on overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who are treated with primary cytoreductive surgery resulting in no residual disease, or residual disease up to 2.5 mm in maximum dimension.Study hypothesisWe hypothesize that the addition of HIPEC to primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival in patients with primary FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.Trial designThis international, randomized, open-label, phase III trial will enroll 538 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Following complete or near-complete (residual disease ≤2.5 mm) primary cytoreduction, patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC. All patients will receive six courses of platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, and maintenance PARP-inhibitor or bevacizumab according to current guidelines.Major eligibility criteriaPatients with FIGO stage III primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are eligible after complete or near-complete primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients with resectable umbilical, spleen, or local bowel lesions may be included. Enlarged extra-abdominal lymph nodes should be negative on FDG-PET or fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.Primary endpointThe primary endpoint is overall survival.Sample sizeTo detect a HR of 0.67 in favor of HIPEC, 200 overall survival events are required. With an expected accrual period of 60 months and 12 months additional follow-up, 538 patients need to be randomized.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsThe OVHIPEC-2 trial started in January 2020 and primary analyses are anticipated in 2026.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03772028


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne J. Rutten ◽  
Gabe S. Sonke ◽  
Anneke M. Westermann ◽  
Willemien J. van Driel ◽  
Johannes W. Trum ◽  
...  

Although complete debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more often achieved with interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), randomized evidence shows no long-term survival benefit compared to complete primary debulking surgery (PDS). We performed an observational cohort study of patients treated with debulking surgery for advanced EOC to evaluate the prognostic value of residual disease after debulking surgery. All patients treated between 1998 and 2010 in three Dutch referral gynaecological oncology centres were included. The prognostic value of residual disease after surgery for disease specific survival was assessed using Cox-regression analyses. In total, 462 patients underwent NACT-IDS and 227 PDS. Macroscopic residual disease after debulking surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival in both treatment modalities. Yet, residual tumour less than one centimetre at IDS was associated with a survival benefit of five months compared to leaving residual tumour more than one centimetre, whereas this benefit was not seen after PDS. Leaving residual tumour at IDS is a poor prognostic sign as it is after PDS. The specific prognostic value of residual tumour seems to depend on the clinical setting, as minimal instead of gross residual tumour is associated with improved survival after IDS, but not after PDS.


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 986-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. Nicoletto ◽  
S. Tumolo ◽  
R. Sorio ◽  
G. Cima ◽  
L. Endrizzi ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term survival in first-line chemotherapy with and without platinum in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. From July 1987 to November 1992, 161 untreated patients with FIGO stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomized: 81 patients received no platinum and 80 received platinum combination. Residual disease after surgery was <2 cm in 61 patients without platinum, 59 with platinum. Median age was 58 years in nonplatinum arm and 55 years in platinum arm (range: 15–73). Complete and partial responses were 51% and 10% for nonplatinum arm and 51% and 8% for platinum arm, respectively (P= 0.7960). Stable disease was observed in 18% of patients in nonplatinum arm and 15% of patients in platinum arm and progression in 20% of nonplatinum- and 21% of platinum-treated cases. Ten-year disease-free survival was 37% for therapy without platinum and 31% for platinum combination (P= 0.5679); 10-year overall survival was 23% without platinum and 31% with platinum combination (P= 0.2545). Fifteen-year overall survival showed a trend of short duration in favor of platinum (P= 0.0678). Relapses occurred after 60 months in ten patients (seven with and three without platinum). The overall and disease-free survivals at 5, 10, and 15 years show no statistically significant long-term advantage from the addition of cisplatin; however, there is a slight trend in its favor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document