Assessment of a New Type I Endoleak Repair Technique Using an Anchoring Device

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-295
Author(s):  
Pham Minh Tuan ◽  
Hiroshi Ohtake ◽  
Seguchi Ryuta ◽  
Go Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Type I ◽  
Repair Procedure ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
New Type ◽  
Descending Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Upper Rim

Objective Type I endoleaks are one of the most frequent and life-threatening complications of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. This study aimed to assess the use of suture-anchoring devices for repairing type I endoleaks. Methods The descending aortic aneurysm model (saccular type) was made by side-to-end anastomosis to a Dacron graft. A Matsui-Kitamura stent graft was deployed to create a proximal type I endoleak. Approximately 5 mm above the upper rim of the anastomosis, the aorta was punctured by the pistol of the suture-anchoring device with a T-shaped bar under fluoroscopy. Sutures were applied until angiography showed the absence of a type I endoleak. During the process, two pressure measurements were used to perform continuous assessments of aortic pressure and intra-aneurysm sac pressure. Results A mean ± SD of 5 ± 1 anchoring shots were used to eliminate type I endoleaks. The device performed well, and no complications were observed. The mean ± SD intrasac pressures before stent graft deployment, during endoleak maintenance, and after repair were 118 ± 5, 61 ± 4, and 26 ± 5 mm Hg, respectively. The postrepair pressure was significantly decreased ( P < 0.001; Student t test). Conclusions Despite some anatomic and clinical limitations identified during the experiments, the effectiveness of the suture-anchoring device was confirmed. Further improvement of the device will soon lead to its use as a less invasive endoleak repair procedure.

Modeling Endoleaks and Collateral Reperfusion following Endovascular AAA Exclusion

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuh K. Chong ◽  
Thien V. How ◽  
Geoffrey L. Gilling-Smith ◽  
Peter L. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Pump System ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Aortic Pressure

Purpose: To investigate the effect on intrasac pressure of stent-graft deployment within a life-size silicone rubber model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maintained under physiological conditions of pressure and flow. Methods: A commercial bifurcated device with the polyester fabric preclotted with gelatin was deployed in the AAA model. A pump system generated physiological flow. Mean and pulse aortic and intrasac pressures were measured simultaneously using pressure transducers. To simulate a type I endoleak, plastic tubing was placed between the aortic wall and the stent-graft at the proximal anchoring site. Type II endoleak was simulated by means of side branches with set inflow and outflow pressures and perfusion rates. Type IV endoleak was replicated by removal of gelatin from the graft fabric. Results: With no endoleak, the coated graft reduced the mean and pulse sac pressures to negligible values. When a type I endoleak was present, mean sac pressure reached a value similar to mean aortic pressure. When net flow through the sac due to a type II endoleak was present, mean sac pressure was a function of the inlet pressure, while pulse pressure in the sac was dependent on both inlet and outlet pressures. As perfusion rates increased, both mean and pulse sac pressures decreased. When there was no outflow, mean sac pressure was similar to mean aortic pressure. In the presence of both type I and type II endoleaks, mean sac pressure reached mean aortic pressure when the net perfusion rate was low. Conclusions: In vitro studies are useful in gaining an understanding of the impact of different types of endoleaks, in isolation and in combination, on intrasac pressure after aortic stent-graft deployment.

Type IIIb Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Zenith Stent Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Keita Maruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
System Type ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present 3 cases of type IIIb endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stent graft system. Type III endoleak, like type I endoleak, is a high-pressure, high-risk leak that increases sac pressure up to or even above arterial pressure, and is associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of aneurysm rupture. Type IIIb endoleak is rare but there is much concern that the incidence of type IIIb endoleak is likely to increase hereafter; the mechanism of type IIIb endoleak is deterioration of graft fabric in conjunction with stent sutures. Type IIIb endoleak is difficult to diagnose before rupture. The possibility of type IIIb endoleak should be highly suspected when the continued growth of an excluded aneurysm sac without direct radiologic evidence is observed during follow-up. Type IIIb endoleak can be repaired by relining of the stent graft with additional stent grafts.

Deployment Finesse of the Cook Zenith Stent Graft

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Fritz Angle
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Standards Of Practice ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Type I Endoleak

For all abdominal aortic aneurysm endografts, the major challenge is minimizing the risk of a type I endoleak. Percutaneous placement of an abdominal aortic endograft has become a widely-performed procedure. With several devices available on the market, there are many device-specific and experience-based considerations in planning and performing these procedures safely and with good outcomes. Although not always evidence-based, reviewing some case-specific scenarios can introduce techniques or lead to standards of practice that reduce suboptimal outcomes or prevent complications in future procedures. This chapter discusses deployment finesse of the Cook Zenith Flex and Zenith LP stent grafts, but many of the described concepts apply to other abdominal endografts and even thoracic endograft procedures.

Assessment of a New Type I Endoleak Repair Technique Using an Anchoring Device

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-295
Author(s):  
Pham Minh Tuan ◽  
Hiroshi Ohtake ◽  
Seguchi Ryuta ◽  
Go Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Type I ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
New Type

A standardized aortic aneurysm model for the assessment of endovascular stent-graft technology

Vascular ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Macierewicz ◽  
J-N Albertini ◽  
R J Hinchliffe
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Straight Tube ◽  
Type I ◽  
Infrarenal Aorta ◽  
Endovascular Stent ◽  
Ovine Model ◽  
Endovascular Stent Graft ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Reliable models of aortic aneurysms are required to test endovascular stent-graft technology prior to human use. We describe the creation of a standardized prosthetic aneurysm in an ovine model to assess endovascular technology. In an adult ovine model under general anesthesia, a polyester sphere measuring 6 cm across was sutured onto the infrarenal aorta following aortotomy. Two weeks later an endovascular stent-graft was deployed in the aorta. Exclusion was confirmed on monthly ultrasound duplex and during angiography at three months and under terminal anesthesia at six months. Autopsy along with histology of the specimen were then performed. A total of 10 sheep underwent aneurysm implantation. Nine received a straight tube endovascular stent-graft (Lombard Medical, Abingdon, Oxon, UK) and seven completed the study. Five prosthetic aneurysms shrank during serial imaging with duplex ultrasound and angiography. However, two remained the same size. One of these had a type I endoleak whereas the other had endotension (type I endoleak confirmed at autopsy). This animal model provides a reliable and reproducible method of creating prosthetic aneurysms for assessing endovascular stent-grafts. It was possible to assess aneurysm exclusion non-invasively using duplex ultrasound. Aneurysms effectively excluded from the circulation shrank whereas those with an endoleak did not.

Intraoperative Proximal Endoleaks during AAA Stent-Graft Repair: Evaluation of Risk Factors and Treatment with Palmaz Stents

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuno V. Dias ◽  
Timothy Resch ◽  
Martin Malina ◽  
Bengt Lindblad ◽  
Krassi Ivancev
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Aneurysm Neck ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Stent Graft Repair ◽  
Palmaz Stents

Purpose: To study factors that might contribute to intraoperative proximal type I endoleak and to evaluate the placement of giant Palmaz stents as a therapeutic option. Methods: Thirty-three patients (30 men; median age 72 years, range 50–85) with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent implantation of fully supported Gianturco Z-stent—based endografts (12 custom-made aortomonoiliac and 21 bifurcated Zenith devices). Ten (30%) patients were treated for intraoperative proximal endoleaks. Stent-graft oversizing and neck angulation, length, and shape were compared between patients with and without leaks. Results: In 9 cases, the endoleaks were successfully treated with intraoperative placement of Palmaz stents without complications. In 1 patient, a leak that was resolved intraoperatively with balloon dilation reappeared 1 month later; a Palmaz stent was deployed successfully. Stent-graft oversizing did not differ significantly between patients who developed proximal endoleaks and those who did not (median 4.0 mm in both groups, p = 0.47). Median neck length was 21.0 mm in patients with endoleak and 28.0 mm in those without (p > 0.99). Median neck angulation was 30° in both groups (p = 0.33), and the presence of a conical aneurysm neck was not significantly different (2/10 versus 6/23, p > 0.99). All aneurysms remained excluded at a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6–24). Conclusions: Stent-graft oversizing and neck morphology (length, angulation, and conical shape) do not seem to correlate with the incidence of proximal type I endoleaks. Palmaz stent placement appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option for this complication.

Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Lesions Using Scalloped Endografts

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Fernández-Alonso ◽  
Sebastián Fernández Alonso ◽  
Esther Martínez Aguilar ◽  
Estéfana Santamarta Fariña ◽  
Jordi Alegret Solé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Blood Pressure Level ◽  
Type I ◽  
Strong Argument ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Rapid Pacing ◽  
Aortic Lesions

Objective: To present our early and midterm results using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a custom-made proximal scalloped stent graft to accommodate left common carotid artery (LCCA) and innominate artery (IA) in treating aortic lesions involving the arch. Materials and Methods: Between February 2014 and April 2017, select patients presenting with aortic arch lesions and short proximal landing zone were treated by proximal scalloped Relay Plus stent grafts. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Results: Six patients (50% male) with a median age of 71 years (range, 60-82) underwent scalloped TEVAR using thoracic custom-made Relay Plus stent graft to preserve flow in the proximal supra-aortic trunks. Target vessels for the scallop were LCCA in 5 cases and IA in 1 case. The technical success rate was 100%, and proximal seal was achieved in all cases with no type I endoleaks on completion angiography. The median follow-up period was 20 (7-32) months. No conversion to open surgical repair and no aortic rupture occurred. One patient had a distal type I endoleak on the 6-month computed tomography (CT) scan, and 1 patient had a proximal type I endoleak on the 12-month CT scan. There was no stroke, paraplegia, retrograde type A dissection, or other aortic-related complication. We routinely used temporary rapid right ventricular pacing to obtain a near-zero blood pressure level during the graft deployment. No complications were observed related to the use of rapid pacing. Conclusion: When anatomy allows, proximal scalloped stent graft to accommodate LCCA and IA is a viable therapeutic option in treating aortic lesions involving the arch with short proximal landing zones. In addition, these findings represent a strong argument for the use of temporary rapid pacing during graft deployment.

Distribution of Air Embolization During TEVAR Depends on Landing Zone: Insights From a Pulsatile Flow Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Makaloski ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
Constantin Trepte ◽  
E. Sebastian Debus ◽  
Bent Øhlenschlaeger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Aortic Flow ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right ◽  
Common Carotid Arteries

Purpose: To analyze the distribution of air bubbles in the supra-aortic vessels during thoracic stent-graft deployment in zones 2 and 3 in an aortic flow model. Materials and Methods: Ten identical, investigational, tubular, thoracic stent-grafts were deployed in a glass aortic flow model with a type I arch: 5 in zone 2 and 5 in zone 3. A pulsatile pump generated a flow of 5 L/min with systolic and diastolic pressures (±5%) of 105 and 70 mm Hg, respectively. The flow rates (±5%) were 300 mL/min in the subclavian arteries, 220 mL/min in the vertebral arteries, and 400 mL/min in the common carotid arteries (CCAs). The total amounts of air released in each supra-aortic branch and in the aorta were recorded. Results: The mean amounts of air measured were 0.82±0.23 mL in the zone-2 group and 0.94±0.28 mL in the zone-3 group (p=0.49). In the zone-2 group compared with zone 3, the amounts of released air were greater in the right subclavian artery (0.07±0.02 vs 0.02±0.02 mL, p<0.01) and right CCA (0.30±0.8 vs 0.18±07 mL, p=0.04). There were no differences between the groups concerning the mean amounts of air measured in the right vertebral and all left-side supra-aortic branches. The amount of air released in the descending aorta was significantly higher in the zone-3 group vs the zone-2 group (0.48±0.12 vs 0.13±0.08 mL, p<0.01). Small bubbles were observed continuously during deployment, whereas large bubbles appeared more commonly during deployment of the proximal stent-graft end and after proximal release of the stent-graft. Conclusion: Air is released into all supra-aortic branches and the descending aorta during deployment of tubular thoracic stent-grafts in zones 2 and 3 in an aortic flow model. Higher amounts of air were observed in right-side supra-aortic branches during deployment in zone 2, whereas significantly greater amounts of air were observed in the descending aorta during deployment in zone 3.

Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Canaud ◽  
Baris Ata Ozdemir ◽  
Lucien Chassin-Trubert ◽  
Julien Sfeir ◽  
Pierre Alric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document