Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair a Single Institution Review

Author(s):  
Castigliano M. Bhamidipati ◽  
Gaurav S. Mehta ◽  
Muhammad F. Sarwar ◽  
Renganaden Sooppan ◽  
Karikehalli A. Dilip ◽  
...  

Objective Mitral valve repair (MVR) is the definitive therapy for mitral myxomatous degeneration. Median sternotomy has been the traditional approach to repair until the advent of the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Minimally invasive surgical approaches for mitral repair have been slow to gain acceptance in cardiac surgery. We review the MVR results from our single-institution academic robotic program. Methods From August 2004 through April 2008, patients who underwent a robotic-assisted (RA) MVR were identified. RA technique included a 4-cm right minithoracotomy, femoral cardiopulmonary bypass with transthoracic aortic occlusion, and RA-MVR. Repair types were combinations of quadrangular/triangular leaflet resection, sliding plasty, chordal transfer/replacement, and edge-to-edge approximation, with band annuloplasty in all cases. Postrepair echocardiography and morbidity follow-ups were completed in all patients. Our primary outcome was adequacy of repair, and secondary outcome was major complications. Results There were 43 patients (29 male and 14 female) who underwent RA-MVR for severe (4 +) mitral regurgitation during the 4-year review. Average operative time was 272.26 minutes. Only one patient had mild postoperative mitral regurgitation, whereas 20 had trace and 22 had no regurgitation after repair. Mean ventilator time was 32.1 hours, and length of stay was 5.7 days. One third of the patients (33%) received postoperative-packed red blood cell transfusions (average: 2.4 units per patient). Twenty-eight percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation after repair. Most of the patients (95.3%) were discharged home. There were no 30-day mortalities. Conclusions Based on our small single-institution experience, RA-MVR provides an effective treatment for severe mitral valve regurgitation. Although procedure durability is slowly being established, preliminary results are promising. Careful programmatic advances with an integrated team approach can facilitate acceptable postoperative outcomes and excellent MVR.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Benito Gonzalez ◽  
X Freixa ◽  
C Godino ◽  
M Taramasso ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Limited information has been reported regarding the impact of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) on ventricular arrhythmic (VA) burden. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of VA and appropriate antitachycardia implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies before and after PMVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with heart failure with reduce left ventricular ejection fraction, functional mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or 4+ and an active ICD or cardiac resynchronizer who underwent PMVR in any of the eleven recruiting centers. Only patients with complete available device VA monitoring from one-year before to one year after PMVR were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected before PMVR and at 12-months follow-up. Results 93 patients (68.2±10.9 years old, male 88.2%) were enrolled. PMVR was successfully performed in all patients and device success at discharge was 91.4%. At 12-months follow-up, we observed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation severity, NT-proBNP and prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension and severe kidney disease. Patients also referred a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and showed a non-significant trend to reserve left ventricular remodeling. After PMVR a significant decrease in the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (5.0–17.8 vs 2.7–13.5, p=0.002), sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (0.9–2.5 vs 0.5–2.9, p=0.012) and ICD antitachycardia therapies (2.5–12.0 vs 0.9–5.0, p=0.033) were observed. Conclusion PMVR was related to a reduction in arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort. Proportion of patients who presented ven Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1756
Author(s):  
Michael Biersmith ◽  
Thura Harfi ◽  
David Orsinelli ◽  
Scott Lilly ◽  
Konstantinos Boudoulas

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 2769-2778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Mauri ◽  
Christian Besler ◽  
Matthias Riebisch ◽  
Osamah Al-Hammadi ◽  
Tobias Ruf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document