scholarly journals Hospital mortality after hip fracture surgery in relation to length of stay by care delivery factors

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (16) ◽  
pp. e6683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Sobolev ◽  
Pierre Guy ◽  
Katie J. Sheehan ◽  
Eric Bohm ◽  
Lauren Beaupre ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145931879526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bennett ◽  
Hsin Li ◽  
Aakash Patel ◽  
Kevin Kang ◽  
Piyush Gupta ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hip fractures are common in elderly patients. However, this population frequently presents with significant medical comorbidities requiring extensive medical optimization. Methods: This study sought to elucidate optimal time to surgery and evaluate its effect on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from 2008 to 2010 on 841 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery. Patients were classified based on time to surgery and were also classified and analyzed according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification system. Results: Patients with a delay of greater than 48 hours had a significant increase in overall LOS, postoperative days, and overall postoperative complications. Patients classified as ASA 4 had an odds ratio for postoperative morbidity of 3.32 compared to the ASA 1 and 2 group ( P = .0002) and 2.26 compared to the ASA 3 group ( P = .0005). Delaying surgery >48 hours was also associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to 24 to 48 hours ( P = .0197). Increasing ASA classification was also associated with significantly increased mortality. Patients classified as ASA 4 had 5.52 times the odds of ASA 1 and 2 ( P = .0281) of in-hospital mortality. Those classified ASA 4 had 2.97 times the odds of ASA 3 ( P = .0198) of an in-house mortality. Anesthetic technique (spinal vs general) and age were not confounding variables with respect to mortality or morbidity. Discussion: Surgical timing and ASA classification were evaluated with regard to LOS, number postoperative days, morbidity, and mortality. Conclusions: Delaying surgery >48 hours, especially in those with increased ASA classification, is associated with an increase in overall LOS, postoperative days, morbidity, and mortality. However, rushing patients to surgery may not be beneficial and 24 to 48 hours of preoperative optimization may be advantageous.


JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 311 (24) ◽  
pp. 2508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Neuman ◽  
Paul R. Rosenbaum ◽  
Justin M. Ludwig ◽  
Jose R. Zubizarreta ◽  
Jeffrey H. Silber

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Endo ◽  
Heather J. Baer ◽  
Masashi Nagao ◽  
Michael J. Weaver

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-353
Author(s):  
Sergio M Navarro ◽  
William C Frankel ◽  
Heather S Haeberle ◽  
Damien G Billow ◽  
Prem N Ramkumar

Background: Studies have shown high-volume surgeons and hospitals deliver higher value care. The aims of this study were to establish meaningful thresholds defining high-volume surgeons and hospitals performing hip fracture surgery and to examine the relative market share of hip fracture cases using these surgeon and hospital strata. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a database of 103,935 patients undergoing hip fracture repair. We generated stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) models of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using length of stay (LOS) and cost value metrics. Volume thresholds predictive of decreased LOS and costs for surgeons and hospitals were identified. Results: Analysis of annual surgeon hip fracture volume produced two volume categories for LOS and cost: 0–30 (low) and 31+ (high). Analysis of LOS by annual hospital hip fracture volume produced strata at: 0–59 (low), 60–146 (medium), and 147 or more (high). Analysis of cost by annual hospital volume produced strata at: 0–125 (low) and 126+ (high). LOS and cost both decreased significantly ( p < 0.05) in progressively higher volume categories. Low-volume surgeons performed the majority of hip fracture cases, although they were performed at medium- or high-volume centres. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a direct relationship between volume and value, translating to improvement in hip fracture care delivery for both surgeons and hospitals. Higher volume hospitals while lower volume surgeons perform the majority of hip fracture cases, suggesting optimisation opportunities. However, systems-based practices at the hospital level likely drive value to a greater extent than individual surgeons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document