scholarly journals Relationship between ABO blood group and risk of venous thrombosis in cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (45) ◽  
pp. e23091
Author(s):  
Fangjing Liu ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Li Rao ◽  
Jifang Song
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Blood Group ◽  
Abo Blood Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Central Catheters

Association between ABO blood group and venous thrombosis related to the peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982095472
Author(s):  
Guodong Wang ◽  
Hongzhi Wang ◽  
Yanfen Shen ◽  
Jing Dong ◽  
Xinpeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Blood Group ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Blood Type ◽  
Abo Blood Group ◽  
Group Status ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Central Catheters

Objective: To evaluate the potential relation between the ABO blood group and the risk of venous thrombosis in cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods: The patients who underwent PICC catheterization in Beijing Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The general information, disease diagnosis, catheterization situation, and complications were recorded for each patient. Further, the blood group status was identified using the hospital information systems. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for symptomatic PICC-related thrombosis. Results: Among the 2315 patients, 131 had symptomatic thrombosis after PICC catheterization. The incidence of symptomatic thrombosis was lower in patients with blood type O when compared with that in patients with blood types other than O. The history of venous thrombosis, tumor category, arm circumference, and insertion attempts are risk factors associated with the PICC-related venous thromboembolism (VTE). After multivariable adjustment, insertion attempts and the non-O blood type were observed to remain associated with thrombosis. Conclusion: The risk of PICC-related thrombosis in patients with non-O blood type is significantly higher than that in patients with blood type O.

scholarly journals ABO blood group related venous thrombosis risk in patients with peripherally inserted central catheters

2017 ◽  
pp. 20170560
Author(s):  
Chung Mo Koo ◽  
Ravi Vissapragada ◽  
Rebecca Sharp ◽  
Phi Nguyen ◽  
Thomas Ung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Blood Group ◽  
Abo Blood Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Thrombosis Risk ◽  
Central Catheters

scholarly journals Use of Double-Lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Safer Perioperative Management of Esophageal Cancer Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Fukuda ◽  
Kiyokazu Nakajima ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyazaki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Central Catheters

Venous Thrombosis Associated with the Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1309-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Allen ◽  
Jocelyn L. Megargell ◽  
Daniel B. Brown ◽  
Frank C. Lynch ◽  
Harjit Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Central Catheters

scholarly journals Association of ABO haplotypes with the risk of venous thrombosis: impact on disease risks estimation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Goumidi ◽  
Florian Thibord ◽  
Kerri L. Wiggins ◽  
Ruifang Li-Gao ◽  
Michael R Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Blood Group ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Genetic Risk Score ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Abo Blood Group ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Genetic risk score (GRS) analysis is an increasingly popular approach to derive individual risk prediction models for complex diseases. In the context of venous thrombosis (VT), any GRS shall integrate information at the ABO blood group locus, the latter being one of the major susceptibility locus for this disease. However, there is yet no consensus about which single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) must be investigated when one is interested in properly assessing the association of ABO locus with VT risk. Using comprehensive haplotype analyses of ABO blood group tagging SNPs in up to 5,425 cases and 8,445 controls from 6 studies, we demonstrated that using only rs8176719 (tagging O1) to correctly assess the impact of ABO locus on VT risk is suboptimal as 5% of rs8176719-delG carriers are not exposed at higher VT risk. Instead, we recommend to use 4 SNPs, rs2519093 (tagging A1), rs1053878 (A2), rs8176743 (B) and rs41302905 (O2) in any analysis aimed at assessing the impact of ABO locus on VT risk to avoid any risk misestimation. Compared to O1 haplotype that can be inferred from these 4 SNPs, the A2 haplotype is associated with a modest increase in VT risk (odds ratio ~1.2), A1 and B haplotypes are associated with a ~1.8 fold increased risk while O2 tend to be slightly protective (odds ratio ~0.80). In addition, our analyses clearly showed that while the A1 an B blood group are associated with increased vWF and FVIII plasma levels only the A1 blood group is associated wih ICAM plasma levels but in an opposite direction, leaving additional avenues to be explored in order to fully understand the whole spectrum of biological effect of ABO locus on cardiovascular traits.

A Retrospective Review of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Persons with Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Loupus ◽  
Susan Schuetrumpf ◽  
Laura F. Vazquez
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Line Insertion ◽  
Picc Line ◽  
Central Catheters

Abstract Introduction: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are a proven and cost effective alternative to traditional short term central venous catheters inserted via subclavian or jugular vein routes. It has been theorized that persons with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) are more prone to upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) post PICC insertion. Purpose: This study was conducted to determine if there is a statistically significant increase in the incidence of PICC-related upper extremity thrombosis in persons with quadriplegia as compared to other patient populations. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 56 PICC insertions, performed on 44 patients, was conducted to identify risk factors associated with symptomatic upper extremity DVTs. Results: The overall incidence of symptomatic DVTs was 7.1% per PICC line insertion (95% CI 2.8% - 17.0%) and 9.1% per patient (95% CI 3.6% - 21.2%) and the number of DVTs per 1,000 catheter days was 3.14. DVT diagnosis was not significantly associated with any of the patient or PICC-related characteristics examined. The incidence of symptomatic DVTs per PICC line insertion was not significantly different than the lowest incidence of thrombosis reported in the scientific literature among all patients receiving PICCs. Conclusions: Results from this study do not suggest that persons with cervical spinal cord injuries are at increased risk for developing upper-extremity DVTs related to PICC insertion. Due to the retrospective nature of the present study and small sample size, prospective studies are recommended to further examine DVTs in patients' with spinal cord injuries. Estimates from the present study can be used in planning prospective studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document